« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A new idea:  (Read 528 times)

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
A new idea:
« on: June 13, 2002, 03:57:47 PM »
What does everyone think about trying this for just one week:

Enable only one type of fighter per base.

I.E.
Base 1, Allies get Typhoon only.  If Axis captures they get 190D only.
Base 2, Allies get Tempest only.  If Axis captures they get 262 only.
Base 3, Allies get Spit IX only.  If Axis captures they get 109G-10 only.
Etc.

The idea is that fights would tend to look a lot more like real WWII dogfights; a mass of F4Us and Zeros, or a mess of Yaks and 109s.  It would also force us all to fly a greater variety of planes.

eskimo
Logged

Offline deSelys

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
A new idea:
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2002, 05:21:50 AM »
You get my vote.
Logged
Current ID: Romanov

It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then it's just a game to find the eye

'I AM DID NOTHING WRONG' - Famous last forum words by legoman

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
A new idea:
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2002, 07:20:37 AM »
Mine too.  I like it.
Logged

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
I'll put it here too :)
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2002, 07:52:51 AM »
I'd love to see a week without icons
Logged
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9418
Re: A new idea:
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2002, 07:56:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by eskimo2
What does everyone think about trying this for just one week:

Enable only one type of fighter per base.

Worth a try.

- oldman
Logged

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
A new idea:
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2002, 09:27:07 AM »
iam 4 it
Logged

Offline ergRTC

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1632
      • http://bio2.elmira.edu/DMS/index.pl?table=content&faculty=1&page=1
A new idea:
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2002, 11:23:08 AM »
I love it. So fresh, so new.......

well maybe i dont LOVE it, but I think its worth a shot.
Logged

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
A new idea:
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2002, 07:37:52 AM »
Come on others, you either like it or hate it.
Is it worth a try?

eskimo
Logged

Offline Jaekart

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 135
A new idea:
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2002, 10:02:23 AM »
I think it is definately worth a try, yet with a few questions.

1)  would the terrain be able to be set up so that the "matched planeset bases " were close to each other, (ie 1 to 1 1/2 sector), and far enough apart that the "uber" planes would have a long flight to get to an "easy kill " location ??

2)  would Bombers, goons etc., be long range flights, or reasonbly close, provoking the 'off hours milkrunning" that would let a base capture be a cinch ??

Just a few thoughts that ran through My Mind while trying to envision this particular setup. :confused:

I definately like the idea of a selective single plane base set up, yet can foresee some bases not getting used at all, and other bases getting heavy usage, depending on the plane there.

Go for it, and lets see what happens. :)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »