Damn, this thread is still going?
So let me see fi I get this all right....
Westy is whining, err, peeved because he insists he gave me a checksix several weeks ago (beats me, flew a lot of sorties between here and then, and I honestly don't recall what the heck he's talking about) and is opposed to giving me, or my buff, friendly or not, in the forseeable future. Hmmm, sounds petty to me. But, can I say I'm suprised? Nah. And I can't really say I care. <shrug> Apparently I am damned because <gasp> I annoyed Mr Westy once upon a time, so beware to the rest of you who cross his uptight path too! Muhahahahaha
Lazs is the lost cause. He's the retard in the corner rocking back n forth like "RainMain" singing "Definately gotta get rid of bombers" along with "KMart Sucks"
All he thinks of is fighters, fighters, fighters. Anything with 2 or more engnies is bad, and he and his imaginery advocates all feel the buffs "ruin his fun", although he won't use "he", he'll always allude to others, who apparently do not exist. There is no discussion or reasoning with someone who fantasizes or imagines support of his own thought....
Ah, then there is Wotan. He who claims I am trying to force everyone to play my game, despite the facts of the discussion. Almost as bad as Laz, but he's got a sense of humor and seems like a good natured guy.
Wotan, we AGREE the B-17 has issues. But as for the buffs in general, what's the big deal? Please, abstain from the Laz "We ruin your fun" mantra. Your fighters on my Lancasters 6 ruin my fun too, but that's how the game is played. Why can't you see it that way?
(Yes, lots of humor has been injected cuz we need it!)
As the thread started out, and has expanded, I dont understand the anti-buff crap still. Seems anything with bombs hung to them piss you guys off