Author Topic: Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds  (Read 438 times)

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« on: July 09, 2000, 10:49:00 PM »
I was FFAing in the TA earlier and started using the 2 x 12.7 (or somesuch) on the Yak with some of the less experienced among us.

I was awful suprised that i got a couple of 1 ping kills (at close range) and a couple others where I sawed a wing off with 1 burst.

Has the hitting power on the BB's been raised, are they usually this effective inside 150, or did I just run a string of lucky shots. i used to use the .303's or the bb's on the 109F (7.7mm?) in training all the time with no damage...but at normal ranges for me (250-350).

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Sorrow[S=A]

  • Guest
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2000, 12:27:00 AM »
think of ShKAS 12.7mm as .50 cal with a wicked temper.
 It's same diameter, approximatly same speed but heavier shell. wicked punch for the money I tell ya..

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2000, 12:54:00 AM »
Psst... they're UB's  

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2000, 04:58:00 AM »
Then we get to another question, is .50 caliber also like cannon, but with higher rate of fire and all the super effects?

-lazs-

  • Guest
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2000, 08:21:00 AM »
I believe that one 20 mm is worth between 2 1/2 to 3 Browning .50's in both AH and WB.   I believe that this is low but with the high leathiality of AH it is not so important as in WB.  As more damage points are modeled all AP rounds should become more leathal while HE rounds will stay about the same.
lazs

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2000, 10:32:00 AM »
Personally, though I find the Yak's armament adequate I have to admit that I miss the two ShVAK 20mm cannons of the La-5FN, and prefer them over two UBS and one ShVAK.  The Yak-9U is an awesome aircraft with E-retention to kill for, but when the La-7 comes out with its three ShVAK loadout option I'll be back in a Lavochkin  
ingame: Raz

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2000, 11:51:00 AM »
Same here Leonid.

Thats why I truely wished that Pyro would have included the x2 B-20 20mm cannon + x1 NS-23 23mm cannon option on the Yak.

It would have given me a reason to fly this plane.

As is .... well I don't want to go into "the" issue for VVS aircraft anymore.

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
"Real Men fly Radials, Nancy Boys fly Spitfires"

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2000, 03:07:00 PM »
Just a few quotes and sites for those of us that are actually interested in how ballistics affect this game...as opposed to those of us that just want to complain that this or that doesn't fit their personal expectations.    
 http://www.riflebarrels.com/density.htm  

has a great article on how air density affects drop. Here's just one illustrative quote that should raise a few eyebrows in any air combat game:

>    From this formula we can see that with all of the air density elements taken into consideration, the ballistic coefficient of a bullet will have a higher value for air of less density than standard, and a lesser value for air of greater density than standard....

     As an example of the difference in drop from an elevation change of 4500' to 5920', let's take an 85 grain Sierra HP BT bullet with a ballistic coefficient of .279, from a 240 Weatherby cartridge at a muzzle velocity of 3500 fps.  The difference in drop figures is not significant until the range is out to 1000 yards or so - about 17 inches difference.  At that range and beyond however the difference becomes greater.  With a bullet of higher ballistic coefficient, the effect would be less. <
 
A 1500' change in altitude equates to 17" of drop in this example; wonder what happens at 20K? !    

Here's another interesting article:
 http://www.riflebarrels.com/longrange.htm

>There is a group of shooters that fire the 50 caliber Browning machine gun cartridge from rifles for extreme long-range shooting. The 50's are truly big, slinging 650-800 grain bullets at roughly 30-06 velocities, no other small arm can compare with them. Some would argue that the 50 is not a small arm but technically speaking they are classified that way.

I shot a 50 BMG with some friends at a shot out tank hull at 2000 meters. With it we could easily spot our hits. With some of the smaller cartridges we have mentioned, shooting something at that range would be out of the question.

Historically the 50 caliber (actually .510") has suffered from a lack of match quality bullets. In the last several years experimenters have been playing with various lathe turned solids. They have used materials such as brass, bronze and even steel for these bullets. Their results have been worthwhile, as accuracy has reached new levels in the fifty. Hornady has made a match type bullet for this caliber called the A-Max. This Hornady offering and the custom lead core bullets made by Lynn McMurdo of Wyoming are the best hunting bullets for the big fifty.

A few years ago a friend told me about shooting a cow elk at about a mile with his fifty and the McMurdo bullet. He got zeroed in on the elk and hit her in the lungs. She died instantly.

I've used my fifty to shoot rock chucks out to a mile or so. Truly a lot of fun when you can hit a target that small at distances like that. <


These guys are shooting from a bench, with scopes and custom bullets, but the point is the basic cartridge is highly accurate at long range. Loooong range.

This site gives some actually ballistic info for military ball ammo using a 1000 yard zero:
 http://gunnery.net/warwagon/50bmg.htm

Caliber .50 BMG Ammo

Project .50/.50 -/- The War Wagon

The following data is for Military Surplus "Standard Hard Ball" .50 BMG FMJ Ammo.  This is not Match ammo and is not the most accurate ammo available, but it will do just fine against hard targets out past a mile (1600 meters).

Caliber .50 BMG [ Browning Machine Gun ]
Bullet Weight - 709gr FMJ-BT  [  Full Metal Jacket - Boat Tail  ]
Muzzle Velocity - 2850 - 3028 fps

Bullet Drop Chart (in Inches)

100y  200y  300y  400y  500y  600y  700y
+28.2 +51.9 +70.5 +83.6 +92.9 +89.3 +81.4  


800y 900y 1000y 1100y 1200y 1300y 1400y 1500y
+65.0 +18.2 Zero -49.8 -112 -191  -288  -404


Here's one that shows that a WW2 era .50 AP round will pierce 19mm of steel plate at 500 meters.
 http://www.biggerhammer.net/barrett/fas/

So, before you accept all the supposition about how the guns are modeled too well or not well enough, realize that there is some FACTUAL data out there.

Enjoy.


[This message has been edited by Toad (edited 07-10-2000).]
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Hooligan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2000, 08:29:00 AM »
Thanks, Hooligan!

Interesting stuff.

So the AP/I will penetrate about a 1/4" of armor plate steel at 1500 yards. That would do for about any of the aluminum parts!

As far as trajectory, I see it drops about 9 mil at 1000 yards in the second table. A mil is about an inch at 100 yards, so this makes the drop about 90" at 1000yds with that zero, right?

An 8 or 9 foot drop at 1000 yards...so if you held for the prop spinner you'd hit around the cockpit/wingroot area?

Thanks for the data!
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

-lazs-

  • Guest
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2000, 08:44:00 AM »
on a sadder note... Was watching (well, bumped into) the CNN TIME news story thingie and seen a whole 10-20 min slander job being done on the .50  rifles.   The of course were making their case for a "ban" on LOL "fifty caliber Assault rifles"    Showing the distanc from the white house that you could expect to kill someone with a fifty was one thing they did.   They also interviewed the heads of every "ban all guns" group they could find.  
lazs

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2000, 09:10:00 AM »
Lazs

Don't worry, be happy. That's the East Coast media elite.

Just remember what happened to the last guys that thought it would be a good idea to disarm the colonials!  
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Dnil

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 879
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2000, 11:10:00 AM »
I saw that report to.  It was too funny in how blatent it was.  I loved the guy saying how he feared terrorists would go buy them if we didnt ban them.  What an idiot, I think if terrorists what to get a hold of a .50 cal. they dont need to head over to Jimbobs feed and firarms.  What a complete waste of my time.

------------------
Dnil
JG-2
Part time aircraft restorer. www.kingwoodcable.com/jheuer

lazs

  • Guest
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2000, 05:12:00 PM »
thanks guys... i guess i'm just cynical and pessemistic.   A friend once showed me a wicked looking compound bow painted flat black with arrows all stacked up on one side of it and what looked like a scope.   It was called an "assault bow"   I told him that if he didn't want attention from the 'ban everything' crowd he would be better off painting it pink and calling it "lady finger" or some such.    Sheesh.... more kids drown in 5 gallon buckets in their own back yard than are killed in gun accidents but u never hear about bucket drownings on the news.   maybe if they called em "assault buckets" we could get safety locks or somethin on em?
lazs

-towd_

  • Guest
Relative hitting power of the various "BB" rounds
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2000, 09:56:00 AM »
let them ban what ever they want . when they ban our firearms they gonna have to come get um . then they will realize why it was important enough to our founding fathers to mention in the constitution that they should be left alone.