Author Topic: why dont we have napalm? (Read 514 times)

JoeDirt · « **on:** July 21, 2002, 11:39:01 AM »

is there some reason we dont have it?

Puck · « **Reply #1 on:** July 21, 2002, 11:41:10 AM »

Mostly because the Rooks and Bish would confuse it with personal lubricant

:D:D

ed: Must still be asleep; grammer is worse than HiTec's (is)

Puke · « **Reply #2 on:** July 21, 2002, 12:59:52 PM »

It's really an anti-personnel weapon and almost everything we hit in here are hardened targets.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #3 on:** July 21, 2002, 03:09:42 PM »

Settin' fire to a hanger doesn't do any damage...

Nefarious · « **Reply #4 on:** July 21, 2002, 03:57:27 PM »

Setting fire to the City does though;)....

Bring on the Nape!

Shiva · « **Reply #5 on:** July 21, 2002, 05:42:36 PM »

Napalming fuel tanks should be fun to watch, too...

Kevin14 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 21, 2002, 05:50:58 PM »

Yeah, I was wondering that also. We should also have depth charges to strap onto the P51s

(In the China-Burma-India theater when bombs were scarce, they used depth charges instead. The Japanese claimed it was illegal to use against troops becuase of the enormous concussions. Lol, but atrocities are OK?)

Hangtime · « **Reply #7 on:** July 21, 2002, 06:42:36 PM »

Napalm would be VERY effecive against those gawdamned cockroaches and other armor units... especially that open turrent turd walker of an ostwind.

Turn the panzies lill armor plated boxes into ez bake ovens.

Dammo, give us Napalm.. I'd really get back into killin the cockroaches if I could toast 'em with Napalm.

Toad · « **Reply #8 on:** July 21, 2002, 06:52:27 PM »

I believe HTC left it out because it is REALLY environmentally unfriendly.

The maps would soon be all blackened and it would take YEARS for the vegetation to recover. Not to mention all the nasty petroleum byproducts in the water sources.

Just a guess.

Saintaw · « **Reply #9 on:** July 21, 2002, 06:56:36 PM »

just imagine the amount of smoke, pbobably enough to get you a slideshow on a PIV 2.2 Ghz too

JoeDirt · « **Reply #10 on:** July 21, 2002, 07:12:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Saintaw
just imagine the amount of smoke, pbobably enough to get you a slideshow on a PIV 2.2 Ghz too

im sure there is a way to fix that....

Hangtime · « **Reply #11 on:** July 21, 2002, 07:14:16 PM »

Smoke? AH Enviornmentalists?

Damn, the mere thought of the chance to flash fry ONE miserable lil AH cockroach herder would be more than worth the frame rate hits or the wailing and gnashing of teeth commin from the polygon preservationists.

In fact, lets give the 'save the polygon pinheads' a demonstration permit.

We'll then demonstrate to everyones satifaction the effectiveness of naplam, without harming any innocent polygons outside the demonstrators immediate proximity.

CavemanJ · « **Reply #12 on:** July 22, 2002, 08:45:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hangtime

We'll then demonstrate to everyones satifaction the effectiveness of naplam, without harming any innocent polygons outside the demonstrators immediate proximity.

Sign me up for that run

LePaul · « **Reply #13 on:** July 22, 2002, 08:52:14 AM »

Nothng would make me smile more than providing a napalm landing site for an La-7 driver in a chute, about to hit the dirt

Saintaw · « **Reply #14 on:** July 22, 2002, 09:14:23 AM »

If we get Napalm, we need infantry 1st, or it won't have it's full fun potential

sick poeple