Originally posted by midnight Target
From the Roeper article.
Uh...did you actually READ my reply to that?
Couric said this:
"Good morning. The Gipper was an airhead! That’s one of the conclusions of a new biography of Ronald Reagan that’s drawing a tremendous amount of interest and attention today, Monday, September 27, 1999." (Couric, Introduction to show.)
Background facts:
The Today Show opens, three days in a row with the announcement, Ronald Reagan was an airhead, that's the conclusion of this new book by Edmond Morris.
When Edmond Morris came on for that interview he described that as a grossly unfair characterization of his point. It was a single quote from the beginning of the book and the entire course of the rest of his book was contradicting that. So when the author himself was interviewed about this, and he says that it was a grossly unfair characterization, whose characterization was it? It wasn't Edmond Morris.
Ann Coulters own words:
What I said was, which is true, that The Today Show opens, I believe it was three days in a row with the announcement, Ronald Reagan was an airhead, that's the conclusion of this new book by Edmond Morris, when Edmond Morris came on for that interview with you he described that as a grossly unfair characterization of his point.
The question:
Who is responsible for Couric's quote? I mean, she said the words, there is no question about that.
Good morning. The Gipper was an airhead! That’s one of the conclusions of a new biography of Ronald Reagan that’s drawing a tremendous amount of interest and attention today The quote is plain wrong, it is a gross, unfair and incorrect statement. Ann Coulter points this out. Now the liberals are gunning for her...using weird weird arguments... Couric didnt say those things (even though she did) because she was only making a (faulty) generalization about the contents of a book, and anyway, she is not to blame, because she only said it once, not three times... You guys are weird.
Now, I dont know whether you liberal guys realize this or not but alot of you guys argue in a very predictable way. It goes something like this: Conservatives are either stupid or scarily weird and therefore you don't have to deal with their ideas, just set them aside. This is a crazy person, it's a Nazi, someone who wants to engage in racism, sexism, homophobia, so don't listen to that person's ideas,
take a quote out of context and dismiss that idea.I know I lose my temper from time to time with you guys. But damn you have earned it. It is so hopelessly frustrating to try to argue with someone that acts like most of you guys do.
For once try to break that pattern. Because right now the First Amendment has been effectively repealed for conservative speech by a censorious, accusatory mob. Truth cannot prevail because whole categories of thought are deemed thought crimes.