Author Topic: Survivor (Read 265 times)

Masherbrum · « **on:** August 20, 2002, 10:19:52 AM »

The last sentence of this link says it all.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/08/20/television.survivor.reut/index.html

Karaya2

Ripsnort · « **Reply #1 on:** August 20, 2002, 10:25:05 AM »

Media and Broadcast stations:
Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money, Ratings and Money, Ratings and money....

AT ALL COSTS!

Masherbrum · « **Reply #2 on:** August 20, 2002, 10:29:07 AM »

You left out Moans and Groans.

Karaya2

Sandman · « **Reply #3 on:** August 20, 2002, 11:26:13 AM »

So he performed in some soft porn movies... big deal.

Charon · « **Reply #4 on:** August 20, 2002, 11:29:10 AM »

Soft porn isn't even real porn. Where's Ron Jeramy?

Charon

Ripsnort · « **Reply #5 on:** August 20, 2002, 11:34:05 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Charon
Soft porn isn't even real porn. Where's Ron Jeramy?

Charon

Don't know what "Soft Porn" is, what kind of rating would it get say, in a movie theatre? R rating? Call me sheltered, or call me "Satisfied with da wife"

I might add, if the networks could sign Bin Laden to do a survivor, they WOULD...get my meaning? My comment had nothing to do specifically with porn.

gofaster · « **Reply #6 on:** August 20, 2002, 12:19:35 PM »

Everyone is focusing on the soft porn films and ignoring the tv jobs he held.

Hey, its not like he showed anything important, maybe a cheek or two. If he had done full frontal, it wouldn't have been soft porn.

I'm surprised a bigger mention wasn't made of the guy from "Temptation Island" who had done gay porn...and was an elementary school teacher!

Kanth · « **Reply #7 on:** August 20, 2002, 12:22:50 PM »

I don't think anyone watched temptation island =P

they don't even know who that guy is..

-dead- · « **Reply #8 on:** August 20, 2002, 12:27:11 PM »

I reckon Survivor might actually be almost watchable if there was soft porn in it. I dunno though - even soft porn might not be able to rescue this blight on our culture.

CptTrips · « **Reply #9 on:** August 20, 2002, 01:12:59 PM »

What porn could he have ever done that is any more demeaning than appearing on "Survivors"?

Wab

Charon · « **Reply #10 on:** August 20, 2002, 01:33:09 PM »

Quote

Don't know what "Soft Porn" is, what kind of rating would it get say, in a movie theatre? R rating? Call me sheltered, or call me "Satisfied with da wife"

Yeah, soft porn is generally topless silicone and bellybutton shots with guns, firey explosions and a car chase or two. Think males 16-25 demographic. R would be the general rating.

I agree with your assesment of television 100% Rip. In fact, he's probably more valuable for his Daytime soap appeal. So far, I've managed to avoid all Survivors, though I got hooked into "The Bachelor" and part of the last "The Mole" by my wife. The mole isn't all that bad actually. A retired Navy 2-star actually played the mole in the last episode and did a great job.

Charon