Originally posted by Karnak
BTW, it also bears no resemblance to what Germany and Japan went through. Those countries suffered massive hits to their industrial output. This idea has no effect at all on anything.
Are you ok? Did you get hit in the head?
Both Germany and Japan suffered HEAVILY from the bombing that occured.
Why do you think that they were in short supply of replacement aircraft, high quality fuels, food and medical supplies?
Why do you think their equipment was so prone to mechanical failures?
Maybe, just maybe it had something to do with factories being bombed so often that they could not produce the quality or quantity of equipment needed to win.
---
No offense karnak, but you sound like one of the buff pilots that Lazs <-- I shudder to say it, is always talking about. Attention starved pilot that looks for satisfaction in closing down airfields by dropping a few bombs on some hangers.
What you seem to be overlooking in this idea is that it is suggesting that the central city have the factories in it, and that the percentage of damage would effect the quantity / availability of enemy equipment. Therefore, the enemy would want to defend the city as much as possible to avoid dwindling supplies. If implemented properly, the central city wold not be ignored until the last bomb fell, it would be a hot-bed of activity.