« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  (Read 381 times)

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: April 27, 2000, 05:46:00 PM »
nuff said

(where have I heard that before?)

The Cow in the Sky
Logged
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2000, 07:10:00 PM »
I hear the Ju-88 and Avro Lancaster are coming.

Sisu
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline YourDead

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2000, 07:11:00 PM »
B-29!!
Logged

Offline Saltty

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2000, 10:31:00 PM »
B 24 would be cool...
Logged

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2000, 12:34:00 AM »
Pe-2, Tu-2, and Il-4!

------------------
leonid, Komandir
5 GIAP VVS RKKA

"Our cause is just.  The enemy will be crushed.  Victory will be ours."
Logged
ingame: Raz

Hans

  • Guest
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2000, 02:18:00 AM »
Lancaster and Do-217 would be nice.

Hanz.
Logged

Offline lasse

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
      • Lassenet
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2000, 04:54:00 AM »
Lancaster and He-111 is a must in all WWII planesets !

That is a fact  

------------------
The Wild Vikings
Commanding Officer
lasse-
Logged
You smell that? Do you smell that?
Napalm, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that.
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
The smell, you know that gasoline smell, smelled like victory.

Offline Azrael

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2000, 05:14:00 AM »
Do we need more buffs for MA gameplay? IMHO no. The B-17 and the B-26 fill the heavy/medium bomber role excellent. A Lanc could maybe sport a bigger bombload but lacks defensive fire power (no belly turret, .303 MG's for defense), a Ju 88 could carry torpedoes to attack shipping in later versions, although torpedo attacks were until now usually replaced by Jabo attacks in a MA environment, but has rather anemic defensive armament.

Regarding Scenarios and a possible RPS any additional plane is certainly welcome, and everyone awaits new planes eagerly, but the MA can only be filled with more underdogs or some late war uberplanes - exceptions like P-47 taken.

Az

   
II.(K)/JG2
Logged

Offline -duma-

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2000, 12:37:00 PM »
Az - I believe I heard the Lancaster will be one of the variants that used .50s for defence(but it is still extremely lacking defence wise).
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2000, 12:56:00 PM »
Cow = Bomber

Buffalo = Fighter bomber

Need more buffalo's...that said, let me say this:
P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61 P61
Logged

Offline Azrael

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2000, 01:47:00 PM »
I know, the fighter pilots are a squiggly bunch that can't designate compass headings, don't know how to hold course or to navigate and all, but that's going too far rip: fighter-bomber != bomber

Put this night-fighter-cannon-mobile into a fighter thread  

Az

   
II.(K)/JG2
Logged

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2000, 03:08:00 PM »
the compass in AH is backwards and very confusing for me  
Logged
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

RANKER_ONE

  • Guest
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2000, 11:35:00 AM »
my mother in law  

------------------
THE ONLY PROPER DEFENCE IS OFFENSE

 Best regards gents :)
Ranker...out!!!
Logged

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2000, 07:26:00 PM »
Hiya Beef !

I've found a nice good looking german bomber and I thought that you really would like to fly it to Bish HQ  

 

Logged

Offline YourDead

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
NEED MORE BOMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2000, 09:26:00 PM »
 

The F-7F Tigercat.  Isnt it almost the same thing as a P-61?

Nation ~ USA
Manufacturer ~ Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp.
Type ~ Fighter
Year ~ 1943
Engine ~ Pratt and Whitney
Wingspan ~ 42'10"
Length ~ 33'7"
Weight ~ Empty=9,042 lbs. Gross=12,186 lbs.
Speed ~ 376 mph. at 17,300 ft.
Ceiling ~ 37,500 ft.
Range ~ 1,090 miles
Armament ~ Six .50 machine guns
Crew ~ 1


On a side note:
 
Those have got to be the weirdest planest I have ever seen...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »