Author Topic: Japanese Kamikaze Manual  (Read 2021 times)

Offline senna

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2002, 06:48:53 PM »
No I would say the cuture was like that. The Samurai code as (cough) brutal and disciplined of a warrior it makes, it was obsolete by the time world war II arrived. It may have had a larger preemptive purpose in controlling the ordinary peasant and peoples in feudal Japan for the warlords but had a lesser importance and affect during world war II. When your zero has taken hits and you just bailed out at 12,000 feet, you have alot of time in the world to change your mind about Bushido on your way down. Specially if your arm is on fire or something. That kind of discipline is endoctrinated into you as a child. Japan was still caught in its traditional systems and more modern systems.

Offline ergRTC

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1632
      • http://bio2.elmira.edu/DMS/index.pl?table=content&faculty=1&page=1
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2002, 06:49:35 PM »
qoute----

--. And to think they were advised about what they would be feeling just before impact! As if the criminal who wrote that drivel would know! Their lives were wasted by criminals who didn't have to pay the price they expected of those kids. A blasted shame IMO.--

unqoute

I know a lot of religious freaks, I mean christians, that dont have any qualms about a dusty old book or a creepy old man or woman at a pulpit telling them what they will experience when they die....

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2002, 06:54:31 PM »
what can i say..all that samurai stuff is BS, you fight to win ,not to die.

Gen Patton said it right " i don't want you to die for your country, i want that other SOB to die for his country"

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2002, 07:03:58 PM »
Few years ago I found a book "The Divine Wind" from Inoguchi, Nakajima and Pineau.

That book was really sad reading but it did gave an another view to the issue.

Really good eye-opener and you can order it from here (33$): http://www.aeroplanebooks.com/ww2_pg4.htm

Offline Biggles

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • Muzak
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2002, 07:19:31 PM »
You inadvertently left part of this paragraph out, but I've included the part you missed, for the sake of histerical accuracy.

Take a walk around the airfield
When you take this walk, be aware of your surroundings. This airstrip is the key to the success or failure of your mission. Devote all your attention to it. Look at the terrain. What are the characteristics of the ground? How many sheep do you see? Are they good sheep, untarnished by bish and knit abuse? What are the length and width of the airstrip? In case you will take off at dusk, or early morning, or after sundown, what are the obstacles to be remembered: an electric pole, a tree, a house, a hill?

I can't find any other omissions.

:)

Offline ATC

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2002, 08:44:57 PM »
My wife and I went to Japan in 1997.  We loved the country and the people.  However, we went to the Imperial War museum in Tokyo towards the end of our visit. .  We found in this place that the Government still thinks the most honorable way to die is to commit suicide and they have no regret over ww2, (at least in this place) .   It still makes me sick and as a result I have lost much respect for their Government and many of their people.  

Anyone who condones suicide is a bloody idiot and a complete coward.  It is the most Unhonorable way to die.  

ATC

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2002, 08:48:55 PM »
If indeed there is a 'culture' involved with this, it is a universal "culture of war", rather than a Japanese "culture of the samurai".

 ....
 
 How less or more 'brutal' is the mentality of carpeting bombing cities and innocent civilians compared to the seemingly incomprehensable Kamikaze attacks? The mentality of using weapons of mass destruction on cities, a devasting bomb which has never been seen before, is something which can be understood as 'circumstances of war' yet the Kamikaze attacks are 'culturaly inspired'?

 Nobody in their sane mind claims the atrocious tactics of massive civilian destruction is derived from "Western culture" itself. People do not associate the horrors of the Holocaust to "Germanic culture", nor do they associate the Dresden bombings to "British culture". They associate it with the universal madness called "WAR". If someone attempts to associate Nazism with the "German tendency of discipline" he'd be probably laughed at. Fascism was a tendency in every western country during the years of 1919 and 1945, and yet, we don't say "that's from the Western culture".

 The seemingly shocking idea behind the "divine wind", if compared in the levels of death and destruction, is actually much less than the massive bombing campaigns of England or USA... and yet, somehow, when a tactic that was born out of desperation is carried out by a country far in the East, which was previously known as a barbaric, and then puts up one hell of a fight against the mightest of the Allied forces, then people feel tempted to associate it with culture. Something that would not be seen in a "normal war"(or rather, "normal people carrying out the war") Ah yes, the ever mysterious "Japanese".

 The reasoning behind the "cultural aspect of the kamikaze" is the mystification of atrocious war-time acts. By doing so, one can dissociate their own acts of war and destruction from the acts done by the losing side.

 In this manner, one can effectively claim their own acts were in accord to a "strategical and tactical sense"(a concept which bears a notion in regards to "familiarity"  of war-time acts - a seemingly 'civilized' behavior), and the acts done by "the other", were unecessary(incomprehensible, barbaric, cruel and very guilty).

 A good example is how none of the leaders who won the war was put on trial or was punished. Are those who gave out orders to kill people in massive numbers less guilty than Tojo Hideki or Adolph Hitler? Brutality, emphasis on discipline and unquestioning subordination, a fetish towards the concept of honorable death - this is something within every military, not just the code of the Samurai. Young Japanese pilots were ordered, tempted, pursuaded to kill themselves for their country. Young western pilots were ordered, tempted and pursuaded to kill others for their country. What's the difference?

 ....

 A certain act of murder and destruction is not questioned when it is carried out in a "familiar" manner, and yet, when it is carried out in a form which they have not seen before, it is in question. It is branded as "culture".

 But in essence, the mentality of killing oneself for a militaristic purpose is pretty much the same as the mentality of killing others(in accord to the "rules of engagement") for the same purpose.

 It is true the "rituals" and "formalities" that shaped up the image of the kamikaze warrior is heavily influenced by Japanese culture. But the overall process of devising an elaborate ideologyand imagery to support the war, to support the ruling class, and make people wildly fanatical, is the same in every country.

 Spiritualness, divineness, and the devotion to the emperor as the samurai, is effectively as same as "Protestantism, capitalism, and the devotion to the Republic as a citizen". One took on a pseudo-feudalistic imagel, the other took a more "modernized" version.

 Kamikaze is a vivid shock in the "image", yet essentialy the same kind of 'reasoning behind the war' as any other Western country had. To me, the reasoning behind dropping of A-bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima is at least 10 times more shocking then the reasoning behind the kamikaze.

 There is the Government which still thinks the most honorable way to die is to commit suicide and they have no regret over ww2, and then there is the Government which still thinks the A-bombings were strategicaly necessary, and has no regret over ww2.  Both make me sick.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2002, 08:51:20 PM by Kweassa »

Offline ATC

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2002, 09:17:27 PM »
Quote
There is the Government which still thinks the most honorable way to die is to commit suicide and they have no regret over ww2, and then there is the Government which still thinks the A-bombings were strategicaly necessary, and has no regret over ww2. Both make me sick.


This entire reply is total bulls---.   I have pity for you and your sole.  unbelieveable indeed.

ATC

Offline Shiva

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
      • http://members.cox.net/srmalloy/
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2002, 10:50:36 PM »
Quote
Anyone who condones suicide is a bloody idiot and a complete coward. It is the most Unhonorable way to die.


So, ATC, in the stereotypical situation where you and your wife are in an aircraft going down, and the two of you only have one parachute, you'd grab it yourself and jump, leaving your wife to die, because to give her the chute would be the same as committing suicide?

In the Bible, John 15:13, it says "Greater love hath no man, that he lay down his life for a friend." Over and over, ourage and dedication and devotion to honor and duty have been recognized by countries all over the world -- recognition of people doing something that they know will get them killed, but which they do anyway because it needs to be done.

Quote
On 31 July 1943, the infantry company of which Pvt. Young was a member, was ordered to make a limited withdrawal from the battle line in order to adjust the battalion's position for the night. At this time, Pvt. Young's platoon was engaged with the enemy in a dense jungle where observation was very limited. The platoon suddenly was pinned down by intense fire from a Japanese machinegun concealed on higher ground only 75 yards away. The initial burst wounded Pvt. Young. As the platoon started to obey the order to withdraw, Pvt. Young called out that he could see the enemy emplacement, whereupon he started creeping toward it. Another burst from the machinegun wounded him the second time. Despite the wounds, he continued his heroic advance, attracting enemy fire and answering with rifle fire. When he was close enough to his objective, he began throwing handgrenades, and while doing so was hit again and killed. Pvt. Young's bold action in closing with this Japanese pillbox and thus diverting its fire, permitted his platoon to disengage itself, without loss, and was responsible for several enemy casualties.


That quotation is taken from the Medal of Honor citation for Pvt. Rodger W. Young. He could have attempted to disengage with his platoon; he had been wounded, and no one would have thought less of him for it. He chose to advance alone into enemy fire, in all likelihood knowing after he was wounded the second time that there was no way he was going to make it back from the hill. But he continued on, and carried out the task he had set for himself, even though it meant his death.

Go read the citations for MoH recipients, particularly the posthumous awards. You will find that a large proportion of them are for actions taken where the recipient knew that they were not going to survive their action, and chose not to remove themselves or be removed to safety.

Quote
. . . During the early stages of this attack, Sgt. Baker was seriously wounded but he insisted on remaining in the line and fired at the enemy at ranges sometimes as close as 5 yards until his ammunition ran out. Without ammunition and with his own weapon battered to uselessness from hand-to-hand combat, he was carried about 50 yards to the rear by a comrade, who was then himself wounded. At this point Sgt. Baker refused to be moved any farther stating that he preferred to be left to die rather than risk the lives of any more of his friends. A short time later, at his request, he was placed in a sitting position against a small tree . Another comrade, withdrawing, offered assistance. Sgt. Baker refused, insisting that he be left alone and be given a soldier's pistol with its remaining 8 rounds of ammunition. When last seen alive, Sgt. Baker was propped against a tree, pistol in hand, calmly facing the foe. Later Sgt. Baker's body was found in the same position, gun empty, with 8 Japanese lying dead before him. His deeds were in keeping with the highest traditions of the U.S. Army.


From the Medal of Honor citation for Sgt Thomas A. Baker, killed during the battle for Saipan. Do you think he didn't know that he was going to die, that staying behind was a death sentence for him? Yet, like Rodger Young and the other 264 posthumous recipients of the Medal of Honor, his 'suicide' was recognized by our country with its highest military honor.

Somehow, it's okay for someone to decide, in the heat of battle, that they are going to die, but that they're going to make their death worth something, and become a hero, but it's not okay for someone to undertake to make a massive strike against the enemy, knowing that they're going to die making it.

And as you think about that, ATC, consider the Western belief in confession and absolution. A man who committed dozens of rapes and murders across years, torturing his victims brutally to death, confesses his sins on his deathbed, is granted absolution, and goes straight to heaven, while a law-abiding man who is driving to church for his weekly confession hits a patch of ice or water, skids out of control, hits a freeway pillar, and is killed instantly goes to hell because he died unshriven and unconfessed.

Quote
We found in this place that the Government still thinks the most honorable way to die is to commit suicide and they have no regret over ww2, (at least in this place) . It still makes me sick and as a result I have lost much respect for their Government and many of their people.


And Japanese businessmen, watching the implosion of Enron, Arthur Andersen, and Worldcom, have lost much respect for American businessmen.

All you proved was that you don't understand their culture, or you would understand why suicide is an honorable death in Japanese culture.

Western cultures are, almost invariably, guilt cultures. They create an arbitrary standard of ethics and morals, and inculcate each member of that culture with a conscience to hold their behavior up against that standard, and it is this internal knowledge of your transgression against this standard that creates guilt, even when no one else knows of the transgression. The many rituals of confession and expiation in guilt cultures exist to take internalized and private guilt and unburden oneself to others.

Eastern cultures, on the other hand, are almost universally shame cultures. In a shame culture, the guidance is imposed from without, from the other members of the culture. A person seeks to avoid doing something that will cause others to criticize or reproach them. This extends to continuing to do something that is wrong in context or inappropriate simply because to stop would be admitting that you made a mistake originally -- that you did not think through the consequences of your action beforehand.

In Japanese culture, suicide can be many things. It can be the ultimate apology; it can be a condemnation; it can be an assumption of responsibility. But what drove the tokkotaijin -- at least, insofare as they were portrayed to each other and to the public, was as the ultimate expression of the Yamato warrior, throwing themselves into battle "as if they were already dead", spending their deaths to strike boldly and massively against the enemy. The only difference between what they did and what men like Rodger Young and Thomas Baker did is that they planned to go out and die taking a bunch of the enemy with them.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2002, 10:53:49 PM by Shiva »

Offline AtmkRstr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 393
Hissatsu!
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2002, 12:06:06 AM »
I'll have to remember that.

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4199
      • Wait For It
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2002, 03:02:15 AM »
Hopefully most of our future enemies will want to die for thier cause... The more dead the better and I'd be more than willing to help them along.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Lazerus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2159
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2002, 04:07:56 AM »
quote<>

How can you ever compare this to the kamikaze attacks. It's a completely different subject alltogether

quote<>
 
Well, I'm not sure about where you live, but fascism is dead where I live, and has always been. Put aside the political groups that pushed it and socialism in those times in my country. It never came to popularity.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2002, 04:12:16 AM by Lazerus »

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #27 on: August 27, 2002, 05:31:45 AM »
Good links; Shive; interesting reading.

Offline hogenbor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
      • http://www.lookupinwonder.nl
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #28 on: August 27, 2002, 06:37:41 AM »
Truly excellent topic, information and discussion. Never would have believed to read something so deep on a discussion forum.

Now my 2 cents (I will read the whole thread thoroughly at home):

Culture is as it may be but consider this:

I saw a program about Japanese and American veterans, on some sort of oceanic misson to track wrecks of aircraft carriers sunk in WWII. I believe Mr. Ballard of Titanic fame was involved.

I saw old men cry and mourn the loss of their young friends almost 60 years ago. At this point in their lives, all the cultural and political issues seemed EXTREMELY trivial. They had infinitively more in common with their former enemies than us whiners on this message board ever will.

Offline ergRTC

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1632
      • http://bio2.elmira.edu/DMS/index.pl?table=content&faculty=1&page=1
Japanese Kamikaze Manual
« Reply #29 on: August 27, 2002, 08:08:29 AM »
laz how bout hoover at the fbi?  THat was about as close to facism as we will hopefully get.  Unless you count the patriot act.  DId you know they can now interrogate librarians to find out what books you have been checking out?  And that it is illegal for the librarian to alert her boss, the police, or the congress that they are doing it?  ick.

Shiva great post.