Author Topic: Things that need to be fixed/added Wish list. "No not my dog" (Read 494 times)

Sachs · « **on:** September 01, 2002, 11:36:40 AM »

First off, let me say this Hi.
My name is AG and I am a recovering Dora-caholic.
I am good enough. I am strong enough. Dag Gone it people don't like me.
Ok now the serious points.
Fw190 D-9 radiator hit from 6 position.
Ta-152 climb and speed correction. Otherwise unperk it.
Ju-88 having the option for 2k bombs.
202/205 jabo. They did carry bombs ya know.
FW 190 F-8 rockets rockets rockets, oh and it carried more than just 700 kg in bombs as well.
Where are the 30mm gondos for the 109 G-6?
190 A-5 deck speed. we all know it should be faster.
Envy value for the 190 F8 come on now 25? Sheesh.
Il-2. Is it just me or is this thing really a panzer in the air? Different weapon loadouts as well for it.
Sorry I know that one isnt axis based but I fly it a lot.
110 C4 it did carry 4 100kg bombs on the wing racks.
Different loadouts for the 110 G-2. give us the R options loadouts.

To be honest to increase the fun factor, intead of adding new planes why don't they give us more weapon loadout options for each aircraft?

brady · « **Reply #1 on:** September 01, 2002, 04:32:38 PM »

Yup, HTC has changed loadouts before, the one(and only one) that comes to mind was the ammo load for the N1K2-J we have other than that they seam prety entrenced about changing their gunn ammo options for planes, even the ones that are wrong.

Mark Luper · « **Reply #2 on:** September 01, 2002, 05:10:09 PM »

Brady, there is another loadout that comes to mind that was changed also, that was the addition of 105 gal drop tanks for the P-47-D30 (Maybe the D-25 too, don't remember).

Thrawn · « **Reply #3 on:** September 02, 2002, 11:44:50 AM »

I agree, they should unperk the Spit XIV.

Puke · « **Reply #4 on:** September 02, 2002, 01:13:45 PM »

I believe the F4U-1 had some of its ammo removed because it was found to be carrying too much.

Kweassa · « **Reply #5 on:** September 02, 2002, 02:59:36 PM »

Who'll be the first to pop here and comment "you guys are being confrontational jerks, and not helping in any sort of way in getting what you wish implemented."

-ammo- · « **Reply #6 on:** September 02, 2002, 03:06:53 PM »

HTC has always been receptive to loadout changes when sufficient and well displayed evidence has been put forth. Make sure your documentation is in order.

I could also say that I thought I put enough evidence forward for the inclusion of the hamilton or curtis paddleblade prop on the D11. Also for the remavle of the D30 jabo loadout (10 rockets with external wing stores at the same time). They get around to stuff like this.

SirLoin · « **Reply #7 on:** September 02, 2002, 03:14:42 PM »

When the P47 D11 was first introduced,the weight was off by I think 500lbs so it turned too good...Was soon corrected..

-ammo- · « **Reply #8 on:** September 02, 2002, 03:21:53 PM »

that's a fact sirloin. Just another example of their receptiveness to justified change.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #9 on:** September 02, 2002, 03:40:43 PM »

The evidence for almost 100% of Sachs changes was provided months ago.

For example we have FW test data on FW190A5 and Ta152H1
that show AH to be incorrect. For example the Fw190A5 was some 20 mph faster on the deck than it is in AH.

But I dont think the 30mm gondolas were used very much on Bf109G6.

Heinkel · « **Reply #10 on:** September 02, 2002, 03:55:43 PM »

Yup, I agree. evidence for all of these have been given

1) Fw190 D-9 radiator hit from 6 position.

Just fly a D-9, you'll see what he's talking about. First 50 cal ping from dead 6, and your radiator is 95% of the time, dead.

2) Ta-152 climb and speed correction. Otherwise unperk it.

Has been proven many times on the BBS that the 152 has speed/climb errors

3) Ju-88 having the option for 2k bombs.

Ju88 is missing a lot of common load-outs, so is Il-2

4) 202/205 jabo. They did carry bombs ya know.

Just a well know fact. I would also like to the the various loadouts for the N1K2-J, 202/205, Il-2, 109's, ect...

5) FW 190 F-8 rockets rockets rockets

If it had the Pzr Blitz rockets then maybe the 25 Eny is justified, but as of now, nobdy flys that plane at all. The "main attraction" of this plane was the Pzr Blitz rockets, somthing we are missing

6) Where are the 30mm gondos for the 109 G-6?

I think these were only common in the later versions of the G-6 (/AS), we have an early version

7) 190 A-5 deck speed. we all know it should be faster.

Yup, should be about 18 MPH faster accoring to charts posted in the past

8) 110C/G loadouts

37 MM for 110G would be nice, espically since we have buff formations now. Not too sure on the C loadouts

brady · « **Reply #11 on:** September 02, 2002, 05:48:19 PM »

Yes I do remember a change to the Typhoon , I beleave drop tanks, Ty for reminding me of the other changes they have done, I have been a bit short temperted lately when it comes to HTC and certain issue's, hopefully I will be given reasion to feal bad about that, in 1.11:)

Wotan · « **Reply #12 on:** September 02, 2002, 08:47:40 PM »

All of you are banned

Karnak · « **Reply #13 on:** September 02, 2002, 10:07:00 PM »

Did the Fw190A-5 really do 365mph on the deck?

Wow, that's impressive for an early 1943 fighter.

I'd like to see the loadouts for the Fw190F-8 fleshed out.

I'd much rather see the FM for the Ta152H-1 fixed than see it unperked. More accurate FMs are always better.

Lazerus · « **Reply #14 on:** September 02, 2002, 10:08:53 PM »

lol Wotan. Just dont forget the most blatant, and important, item Heinkel mentioned, the attack capabilities of the c205. IMHO, that just has to be fixed