Oldman:
Agreed. I was not originally (and am not now) worried about maximizing one's K/D ratio. My original intent was to suggest that the Spits were good planes in which to learn ACM.
By my last post regarding K/D, I simply meant to illustrate that the allegedly "magic" Spits, like all planes, have disadvantages that offset their strengths.
I am curious, though. What are the "bad habits" to which you refer? I submit that if you fly a Spit and consistently improve your K/D ratio, you likely are not developing bad habits. (At least not "technical" bad habits like pulling until you burn all of your energy--who knows about other sorts of "bad habits" like leaving your wingmates stranded, refusing to engage without numerical superiority, etc.?) Indeed, you probably are developing at least good situational awareness and hopefully some ACM skill as well.
I know that it's a popular idea, but if you're suggesting that scores are no indication of ability, I reject that notion out of hand. I have fought and died at the hand of pilots with a K/D > 10 or so and, as far as I can tell (which, granted, may not be all that far), they didn't earn that number by being a slouch behind the stick. Sure, there are always ways to "game the game," but I don't think that one's scores are meaningless. In particular, scores can be meaningful to the individual who is aware of how he has flown over the course of successive tours, as a way to chart his progress.
- JNOV