Author Topic: The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.  (Read 954 times)

Offline wulfie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
      • http://www.twinkies.com/index.asp
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« on: September 09, 2002, 04:10:54 PM »
I've been overseas alot.

The rest of the world has much of it's opinion about the U.S.A. and the Citizens of the U.S.A. based on (primarily U.S.) media coverage of the U.S.A.

Anyone living in the U.S.A. knows that a vast majority of the Citizens of the U.S.A. couldn't give a rat's bellybutton *who* Michael Jackson was seen with for example.

But the 'media' based in the U.S.A. (now) mainly exists to 'sell copy', which is why you had 10 times as many stories about Princess Diana (I never bore any ill-will towards Princess Diana mind you, she was pretty attractive and seemed to generally 'have her feet on the ground) and her life as there were about Mother Theresa.

9/11/01 was the biggest bloody nose suffered by the U.S. as a Nation recently. It was the biggest bloody nose suffered by the innocent civilians of the U.S. ever. There's alot to mourn about.

But my idea of mourning is the friends and relatives of the victims being recognized for their sacrifice/loss by the U.S. Government. Make a memorial somwhere, have the friends and relatives make the call about what it should be. Have the President, Senate, Congress meet these friends and relatives over an extended period of time (so the President, Senate, and Congress can keep on top of their day to day jobs).

Any media coverage is going to be a joke to say the least. We're going to have a bunch of commentators and media personalities acting somber and shaken but let's all be honest - most of the people you are going to see on TV probably lost 1-3 nights of sleep over the whole affair, mainly worrying if there was going to be a NBC attack in the big city where they work. Any look or demeanor of mourning or sympathy is most of the time going to be really good acting.

And from the point of view of the other Nations in the world, the media coverage is going to be an embarrasment for me.

Because in the world history of the last 20 years, we got off pretty damn light.

People in the U.K. felt bad about the attack, because they had an idea of what it must have been like in NYC on that day. A fair # of people living in London have probably seen the aftermath of an IRA bomb attack. The same goes for many who live in Ireland.

People in Eastern Europe could sympathize and probably did. They've seen *worse* in recent history. I have been in the proximity of several mass graves in Eastern Europe (the result of the recent conflicts in Bosnia and Yugoslavia) and the death toll for those locations tops 9/11/01. And those losses were brutal and personal on a very individual level. One was women and children. They weren't going to kill them at first, just rape them (the women that is, I guess they just left the children outside the buildings to hear their Mothers scream) and demean them. Then they decided to kill them afterwards. Another was Fathers and Sons and other Men of military or potential military age. They started to kill them. Some escaped into a nearby forest, where there were 'military' units waiting for them - they were hunted down...in pairs, in small groups, etc. and executed.

Remember Rwanda? 300,000+ murdered. Mostly with edged weapons. Let the U.S. 'media' say what they will about France, but the French Foreign Legion was the only force to initially intervene - with an armored reconaissance company. That's some pretty big balls in my book.

My point is this - 'our' (U.S.) 'media' is going to paint a picture that the 'Nation' is 'torn with grief'...while 'our' (U.S.) 'media' spent more time covering some dumb bellybutton Hollywood based 'scandal' story or something of like unimportance while an ocean or so away helpless people were being murdered by the types of people we (the U.S.A.) are supposed to stand against because of the very reasons our Nation was founded. Don't get me wrong here - I'm in the military and I understand that we cannot deploy to every atrocity to save the day. My problem here isn't with the U.S.A. at all, or the Citizens of the U.S.A., or the Government of the U.S.A., or U.S. foreign policy. It's with the .00001% of the U.S.A. who determines what our media reports and how they report it - and I think they live in dreamland, don't have a clue, and don't care. Usually it doens't have too much of an impact on Joe the car mechanic in Wisconsin. But in this case I think Joe would be embarrased.

In short, from the picture our 'media' is going to paint for the world 'on our behalf' (i.e. to generate some ratings) it's like we broke one of our legs and we are crying about the pain to people who have been undergoing chemotherapy treatments for 20 or more years.

The contrast that hits me is this - Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Communist Russia - all pretty brutal regimes. And the U.S.A. (any many other Nations) all went to war against them. Maybe not 'only' for 'Noble Causes' but alot of the rank and file who volunteered to actually get killed 'bought into' volunteering because they believed in said 'Noble Causes'. And while those conflicts were going on, the 'media' (which consisted of persons you could actually call 'reporters of the news' back then) didn't have Nation-wide 'weep-ins' with sappy dumb-ass music on December 7, 1942. They were busy reporting the current status of the conflict on several different continents.

Ask yourself honestly - would you really miss out or care if there wasn't heavy media coverage of the 11SEP01 'anniversary'?

I think most of the Citizens of the U.S.A. do feel bad. I don't think they don't care about what's happened to women and children and other innocents around the world - I think our piss-poor media coverage never informed them enough that they could care. After all - working 8 a day with 2 kids and a significant other at home probably leaves little time for research on current world events, especially before the internet was widely available and developed.

I'd say fly your flag at half mast for the day. Send a week's pay (or however much you can afford) to the Red Cross or the 9/11 'fund' or the 'dependant's fund' for the NYC policemen and firefighters. And don't turn on your TV - you're generating ratings for a group of people that don't really care and have nothing in common with your 'average' (if such a thing exists) American - i.e. you, me, the bartender, etc.

If we're going to have a big special day do it like the U.S.A. used to do it - when the currently relevant bad guys were all toast and it was time for a short but well-earned vacation.

Mike/wulfie
« Last Edit: September 10, 2002, 03:07:16 AM by wulfie »

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2002, 04:15:35 PM »
Sorry... but I don't rely on the media to define the impact of 9/11 on me.

And I do feel your summary is inaccurate and tasteless on many levels.

AKDejaVu

Offline wulfie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
      • http://www.twinkies.com/index.asp
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2002, 04:19:12 PM »
Hey I can understand if you disgree. And I'm not offended that we differ in opinion. But I wasn't (and always try to ) avoid being 'tasteless'.

Drop me an email at wulfie14@hotmail.com if you have the time to let me know what you think is 'tasteless'.

Also, if the media doesn't have an impact on your opinion - well you pretty much don't apply in the case of what I posted. My whole point was the image the media coverage generates may not be what some people think it should be.

Mike/wulfie

(edit: AKDejaVu, I had a '_' on my hotmail email incorrectly - email address now correct)
« Last Edit: September 09, 2002, 04:40:28 PM by wulfie »

Offline Wlfgng

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5252
      • http://www.nick-tucker.com
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2002, 04:37:42 PM »
the media has MONEY as it's moivation.

pity.

Offline Daff

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 338
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2002, 04:38:21 PM »
Hmmm..just as I thought I had you all figured out, Wulfie, you drop this one.

Daff

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2002, 04:49:22 PM »
actually I plan on watching a lot of the shows on diferent networks. The coverage has already begun.  CNN and Fox and MSNBC had a whole bunch of stuff on the tragedy aneversary this weekend...

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2002, 05:22:27 PM »
I like the coverage. Most of it is well meaning and I like the reflection it engenders. Call me sappy. :cool:

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2002, 05:26:23 PM »
Udie, do you really think you need to do that, based on the way things have gone for you lately? I mean, you did list 9/11 as one of your major "downers". Not trying to be cute, just curious if that might be a bit self-destructive?

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2002, 05:27:59 PM »
ppl need reminding

most have shot their short term memory to the point it is  the shortest feature of their body

there will always be news - some of it worth hearing more than once

and the latest video out today from Jazz TV :mad:

hope it wakes up those who are even more lost than the average joe:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=578&e=1&cid=578&u=/nm/20020909/ts_nm/attack_alqaeda_dc
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline wulfie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
      • http://www.twinkies.com/index.asp
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2002, 06:39:24 PM »
Eagler and Midnight Target:

'Reminding people who may have forgotten' is a pretty good point.  However, I wonder how long it will stay in the forefront of some people's minds after the '1 year anniversary'.

Target: 'sappy' is like 'too paranoid'. If you ever if you wonder if you are, you probably aren't. :)

Mike/wulfie

Offline Moloch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 250
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2002, 06:55:46 PM »
Well put, wulfie!

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2002, 09:12:29 PM »
"However, I wonder how long it will stay in the forefront of some people's minds after the '1 year anniversary'.

depends on the shape and depth of their mind. the majority of pinheaded, shallow, self centered ones will forget. Who gives a rats arse what they think or FEEL anyway

I for one appreciate the media stoking this fire in the bellies of six pack WWF joe and lefty lib america
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline texace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
      • http://www.usmc.mil
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2002, 09:54:50 PM »
I...for one...believe that too much media coverage is a bad thing. Sure, it may stoke the fires, but when every single Golly-geened TV networks has something on 9/11, then maybe it's going too far.

I'll remeber 9/11 sure...but I will never get over the would be patriots with flags on their cars or trucks that are far from recognizable...torn and faded...

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2002, 10:52:57 PM »
Quote
Target: 'sappy' is like 'too paranoid'. If you ever if you wonder if you are, you probably aren't.


um.... ok?


:)

Offline Elfenwolf

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
The problem with U.S. media coverage of the 9/11 'anniversary'.
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2002, 11:28:59 PM »
wulfie, I appreciated your imput. Agree or not it's food for thought.