The worst part of this is that there is no way for the accused person to find out if the accusations are true. 190 pilots will have to risk facing this accusation every time they try any sort of scissors, and so will 109 pilots. I'm not saying this is any sort of conspiracy against the LW, just that those two planes are most commonly accused of.
There could be truly "innocent perpetrators", there could be "guilty dweebs", and there could be "wrongfully accused".
There was this one case I was facing a P-51D behind me in a 190D-9 where I was accused of being a "stick stirrer". Basically, all I did was do a scissors in a figure-8 fashion which I call "falling leaf".. to minimize E-loss and to give a unpredictable flight path.
All through this maneuver I was watching the P-51 behind me, and my stick inputs basically aimed to match the attacker's movement. He wants a guns solution, I roll out of the way, 180 degrees opposite to the angle of his wings. He rolls for me again, I continue the roll, change flight path, and get out of the way again. How fast these rolls come out is totally defined by the fashion the attacker pursues me, and finally I got him to overshoot.
The next message I get is "nice stick stirring."
..
Now in this case, it is possible that I could be an "innocent perpetrator". Either that or I'm "wrongfully accused", because I sure as hell wasn't a "guilty dweeb". I tried explain to him I wasn't "stirring" my stick in anyway, and basically all I did was a "figure-8 roll". He keeps insisting that is the proof of stick-stirring, "moving stick into figure 8 - stick stirring", when in truth the figure-8 rolls come out with just two stick inputs - left and right.
Whatever it was, it denied him aim and made him overshoot. So, am I doing the micro-warps? Or is the attacker being an arse? I have no idea. I suggested he film me if he sees me doing it again and send it to me, because I really have no way of knowing if what he accused is true or not - and that sucks!