Author Topic: NATEDOG please red this.  (Read 1097 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
NATEDOG please red this.
« on: September 20, 2002, 07:28:18 PM »
Hi.

I like your Tiger but there are a few things that are a bit innacurate and could be fixed.

You have modeled an early Tiger I based on the gun mantlet, commanders cupola, lack of zimmeritt and a few other details.

Here is what's wrong with your model.

It lacks the triple smoke dischargers on the turret sides.

The circular air vent on the turret roof was placed behind the loader's hatch on early Tiger's, the way you have it now is like was on mid and late models.

Also the early Tiger I did not have the loader's periscope.

The vision slits on the commanders cupola are much too tall, they were very very thin on early Tiger I.  The AH cupola looks more like an early Panther type.

The holes for the binocular gunsight are just a bit too high. They were more in line with the coaxial MG.

You could add some big bolts where the barrel sorround meets the mantlet. There were 6 of them, 3 to a side,  spaced exactly like this  (O)

You also missed a circular dome air vent centered exactly between the driver's and radio operators hatches immediately above the light.

And last I am afraid that Tiger I porbably did not mount an AA MG in it's cupola. I might be wrong but they did not have the standard ring fitting or any other means to attach one.  


I don't know if you will take this as whining but I wanted to point out a few areas that could be made better and more accurate.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2002, 07:42:09 PM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2002, 08:10:07 PM »
NATEDOG, She IS Most Beautiful, And I am All Kinds of Happy to see her, But I am afraid GRUNHERZ is quiet right, I was a Tank Geek long before I was a Plane Geek, and I noticed these things as well, but manely the AA MG issue, It would Be cool if you could make some of the mod's he has sugested:)

                   
                                                TY again:)

Offline Kratzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
      • http://www.luftjagerkorps.com/
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2002, 09:47:13 PM »
Dorks.

Offline Gixer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2002, 10:00:23 PM »
I just hope that it has better armour then a M3!!!

As for camouflage schemes I would like to see something like this added to the Typhoon.  :D  :D  




...-Gixer
The Horse Soldiers

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2002, 10:21:45 PM »
Hi.

I like your Tiger but there are a few things that are a bit innacurate and could be fixed.

You have modeled an early Tiger I based on the gun mantlet, commanders cupola, lack of zimmeritt and a few other details.

Here is what's wrong with your model.

It lacks the triple smoke dischargers on the turret sides.

The circular air vent on the turret roof was placed behind the loader's hatch on early Tiger's, the way you have it now is like was on mid and late models.

Also the early Tiger I did not have the loader's periscope.

The vision slits on the commanders cupola are much too tall, they were very very thin on early Tiger I. The AH cupola looks more like an early Panther type.

The holes for the binocular gunsight are just a bit too high. They were more in line with the coaxial MG.

You could add some big bolts where the barrel sorround meets the mantlet. There were 6 of them, 3 to a side, spaced exactly like this (O)

You also missed a circular dome air vent centered exactly between the driver's and radio operators hatches immediately above the light.

And last I am afraid that Tiger I porbably did not mount an AA MG in it's cupola. I might be wrong but they did not have the standard ring fitting or any other means to attach one.


I don't know if you will take this as whining but I wanted to point out a few areas that could be made better and more accurate.


Don't worry Natedog, i'm one step ahead of you.:D
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
Re: NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2002, 11:04:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Hi.

I like your Tiger but there are a few things that are a bit innacurate and could be fixed.

.


and you forgot the coddamn cupholder !!!

I hate it when they forget the most imprtant part ;0

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2002, 11:21:41 PM »
Have you guys thought it might not be finished?
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2002, 12:15:11 AM »
Sure and thats why I suggested the fixes....

Offline Dessy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2002, 05:40:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gixer
I just hope that it has better armour then a M3!!!

As for camouflage schemes I would like to see something like this added to the Typhoon.  :D  :D  




...-Gixer
The Horse Soldiers


How about this? :eek:


Offline FDutchmn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2002, 07:33:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dessy


How about this? :eek:



Nice but nahhh, I think you are missing Gixer's point.  Take a look at the camoflauge Gixer mosted more carefully and tell me what you see :D

Offline Dessy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2002, 07:40:05 AM »
Yes yes I know; if you stare at the P-38 long enough, not only will you see those, but also a kangaroo and who knows what else ;)

Offline DrDea

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2002, 04:47:50 AM »
Dont forget that this model tank also had a rotating framus pivot attached to the dween cam that co induced the belvin panels coaxil recriprocating allignment.Wouldnt be natural without that part.:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
The Flying Circus.Were just like you.Only prettier.

FSO 334 Flying Eagles. Fencers Heros.

Offline Gixer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2002, 06:33:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dessy
Yes yes I know; if you stare at the P-38 long enough, not only will you see those, but also a kangaroo and who knows what else ;)



I've been squinting at that P38 for half an hour and still can't see a Kangaroo let alone anything resembling the female form.

Even if I could see a Kangaroo they don't do much for me, even though I'm half Australian. Fiesty beasts, kick and punch like a mad women.



...-Gixer
The Horse Soldiers

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2002, 04:19:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I like your Tiger but there are a few things that are a bit innacurate and could be fixed.


:eek:  And so it begins.

-Sikboy
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline SunKing

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3726
NATEDOG please red this.
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2002, 04:56:00 PM »
" It lacks the triple smoke dischargers on the turret sides "

I always thought those were some anti infanty devices that dropped grendade  outside when enemy troops were on the tank.