While exercising my thumb with the TV remote the other day, I ran across a news program discussing the tendency of U.S. colleges to hire mainly Democrats to faculty positions. One of the guests was an author of a book on this issue, who had visited more than 200 campuses across the nation, asking the faculty members which political party they belonged to.
His conservative presence was balanced by that of the program's host and two other guests, both of the liberal persuasion. Typically, it was one of those discussions where a speaker's statements were constantly being interrupted by the others. (Sorry that I do not remember the name of the program or the host. I am rapidly approaching seniorhood.)
Nevertheless, the discussion piqued my interest, and some questions popped to mind. I offer them up here for discussion:
1. In a society that is pretty evenly divided down the middle of the political spectrum, how can one political group so dominate the hiring of academics?
2. Could this be deliberate?
One of the guests on the program, a red-headed woman who was a faculty member at a California University, responded to the first question by stating the following: Republicans who have a college education are more interested in earning money than in applying for jobs in the academic community; Democrats were more interested in becoming educators. In other words, the superior virtue of the Democrats led them to serve the needs of our youth.
What do you think? How could such a disproportionate number of Democrats be hired "accidentally?"
Regards, Shuckins