Ya know what HTC screwed up by adding the B 17 instead of the B 24

, is it me or is this the mother of all catch 22's? The only reasion we don't have both is the time it takes to model theam, and prodduction numbers are not realy revelent when deciding what aircraft should be added, yes the B 24 was produced in huge numbers and was vital to the war effort. The Ki 67 was not produced in huge numbers by comparision but was vital to the Japanese war effort at the time. What is vital to HTC in deciding what to add? Dificult to say, depends on what you are talking about, fighters, tanks, ships, buffs. Insomuch as buffs are concerened, i can't imagine that a B 24 would be vital at this point ( I hope that goes for an A 26 as well, I suspect howeaver that is not the case), the sole reasion for this is the presence of the B 17. Personaly I would rather see the B 24 than the B 17, I like the B 24 more, always have.
On the subject of the A 26, I suspect it is a likely addation because of it's spead, and aramement and durabality, it is the best in it's class, and as Pyro has stated in the past he does not realy care what the country of orgin is he simply looks at how capable the platform is.
Bering this in mind, Planes like the He 177,Cant Z 1007( better than a SM 79),P 108, TU 2, Ki 67, Coranado, Me 410, and the A 26, all would be great addations to the MA