Author Topic: Need new bombers ! (Read 814 times)

NewNuke · « **on:** December 30, 2001, 08:08:00 AM »

Hello am just testing if it works =).
And I wanted to say a little hi to everybody.
We need some new bombers in here personnaly
I would like a perked B29 (50 perks should be good) with 4 turrets...dreaming about it.
Tell me what you guys want and E-mail me or ICQ me has you want =).Later guys

SirLoin · « **Reply #1 on:** December 30, 2001, 08:13:00 AM »

HI NewNuke!..

Revvin · « **Reply #2 on:** December 30, 2001, 08:36:00 AM »

I'd like to see the Mosquito bomber variant in the next version. A B24 variant would be a nice addition too.

Sunchaser · « **Reply #3 on:** December 30, 2001, 09:17:00 AM »

I would like the B17 refurbished, that old beta paintjob is wearing thin.

Kieran · « **Reply #4 on:** December 30, 2001, 09:39:00 AM »

Give us an A20 instead; far more useful, nonperkable, and ubiquitous throughout the war.

K West · « **Reply #5 on:** December 30, 2001, 09:49:00 AM »

Award 20 PERK POINTS to Kieran for appliance of the word "ubiquitous"!!

lazs1 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 30, 2001, 10:09:00 AM »

I wouold like to see all the bombers in AH but their bombs should only damage bomber hangers and GV's.
lazs

Staga · « **Reply #7 on:** December 30, 2001, 03:27:00 PM »

ROFL!

brady · « **Reply #8 on:** December 30, 2001, 03:44:00 PM »

How about we add some Buffs for other countries before we add more stuff to the US plane set?

Kieran · « **Reply #9 on:** December 30, 2001, 04:27:00 PM »

Westy-

40 points to whoever defines it!

Brady-

Agreed, I simply would prefer an A-20 to a B-29 for gameplay reasons.

hazed- · « **Reply #10 on:** December 30, 2001, 04:38:00 PM »

I think LW/russian/japanese/italian all deserve a decent bomber before we see ANY US bombers.

Plus B24 liberator did most of the US's work in bombing so that should really be introduced before a b29 or a20

Sunchaser · « **Reply #11 on:** December 30, 2001, 05:00:00 PM »

Well, if Kieran gets 20 points for using it he should lose 10 of them for actually spelling it right!

It is bad enough to use such an underused word when there are perfectly good other words we could all understand and a few of us could spell without resorting to a dictionary....and someone who knew how to use it, but to add to our humiliation by spelling it correctly is way over the top.

Jeeze Kieran, ya coulda just said there were lots of them.

Kieran · « **Reply #12 on:** December 30, 2001, 05:29:00 PM »

Hey, it's one of the perks of being a teacher- every communication is an opportunity to expand minds.

BTW, you got 40 points for defining it!

olddobe · « **Reply #13 on:** December 30, 2001, 07:12:00 PM »

To add German,Japanese,Italian,or Russian bombers would be good for nostalgia.Unlesss they super "ubered" them,thats about all they'd be good for!
Fact is, only the Brits and Yanks had enough foresite to produce effective long range bombers.
The IL-2 should be improved to it's real capabilities,and I feel a couple of night fighters would be nice.The P-38L is unfairly
modeled,as the compression problem was pretty much taken care of in that model.
What we really need is a "Washing Machine Charley",or a Fairey Swordfish

Dobe

BenDover · « **Reply #14 on:** December 30, 2001, 07:40:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sunchaser:
I would like the B17 refurbished, that old beta paintjob is wearing thin.

I would also like to see this

How about a medium brit bomber (wot was it? a wellington?),

As for russian bombers...all they realy had was il-2 and their version of the c47(li-2), which would be cool to have cos it has guns, weak guns, but guns none the less.

A 'HE-wot ever the hell its name was' for the germans

Italians had bombers??