Author Topic: Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?  (Read 440 times)

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« on: October 12, 2002, 12:10:03 PM »
I think it would be a great addition to the planeset, and especially because of the midway scenario so half the japanese force won't have to fly TBM's against F4F's! :)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2002, 12:30:38 PM »
I would rather see this:

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2002, 12:44:15 PM »
Kate or Grace pls...and P47-d22/23

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2002, 12:51:11 PM »
The big problem I see with the kate being added is us being stuck with it. Historicaly HTC adds aircraft for Japan at what could genioursly be described as a "slow" rate. ow I know that does not mean that will continue to be so, what with the popularity of PAC set up in the CT and for Events I fully expect to see more of these planes being added. Howeaver just how many Naval torpedo planes can we expect HTC to deleaver? of the Three designed for CV opps the Kate, Jill, and Grace the latter would clearly be the most usefull in the MA and would add collor to all events and set up's, for years now we have had to sub late war allied types for Axis planes(even Russian plane's) why must we be forced to suffer throught with an early war torp bomber when we could have a great machine like the Grace.

 I would much prefer the Jill if we cant get the Grace, at least she is mid war and with better preformance.

 The Jill and the Kate both have very week guns, and are both way outpreformed by the Grace.


 UNITS ALLOCATED
752nd and Yokosuka Kokutais.

TECHNICAL DATA
Description: Single-engined carrier-borne torpedo and dive-bomber. All-metal construction with fabric-covered control surfaces.

Accommodation: Crew of two in tandem enclosed cockpits.

Powerplant:
One Nakajima NK9B Homare 11 eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1,800 hp for take-off, 1440 hp at 1,800 m and 1,560 hp at 6,400 m, driving a constant-speed four-blade metal propeller (B7A1 protorypes).
One Nakajima NK9C Homare 12 eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1,825 hp for take-off, 1,670 hp at 2,400 m and 1,560 hp at 6,550 m, driving a constant-speed four-blade metal propeller (production B7A2).
One Nakajima NK9H-S Homare 23 eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 2,000 hp for take-off and 1,570 hp at 6,850 m, driving a constant-speed four-blade metal propeller (one experimental B7A2).
One Mitsubishi MK9A ([Ha-43] 11) eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 2,200 hp for take-off, 2,070 hp at 1,000 m and 1,930 hp at 5,000 m, driving a constant-speed four-blade metal propeller (B7A3).

Armament:
Two wing-mounted 20 mm Type 99 Model 2 cannon and one flexible rear-firing 7.92 mm Type 1 machine-gun (B7A1 and early production B7A2).
Two wing-mounted 20 mm Type 99 Model 2 cannon and one flexible rear-firing 13 mm Type 2 machine-gun (late production B7A2).
Bomb-load: one 800 kg torpedo or up to 800 kg of bombs.
B7A2
Dimensions:
Span 14.40 m
Length 11.49 m
Height 4.08 m
Wing area 35.4 m2
Weights:
Empty 3,810 kg
Loaded 5,625 kg
Maximum 6,500 kg
Wing loading 158.9 kg/m2
Power loading 3.1 kg/hp
Performance:
Maximum speed 306 kt at 6,550 m
Climb to 4,000 m
in 6 min 55 sec
Service ceiling 11,250 m
Normal range 1,000 naut miles
Maximum range 1,640 naut miles

Production: A total of 114 B7As were built as follows:

Aichi Kokuki K.K. at Funakata:
9 B7A1 prototypes (May 1942-Feb 1944)
80 B7A2 production aircraft (May 1944-July 1945)
Dai-Nijuichi Kaigun Kokusho at Omara (Sasebo):
25 B7A2 production aircraft (Apr 1944-Aug 1945)

Found it here http://www.combinedfleet.com/kaigun.htm

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2002, 12:57:52 PM »
Kate wouldnt be that "useless" in MA, I play in CT 95% of the time, but even when I play in MA I can usuelly get at least 3-5 kills in a val or someother "stinky" early war plane :)

And besides I was assigned Kate in midway, & it just want feel right shootin down allied AC in allied AC lol!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2002, 09:40:42 PM »
No.

Get the Japanese equivilent of the TBM, the B6N2.

If the Japanese get the B5N, then give the Devastator to the US.

Stop making the Japanese fight with inferior equippment relative to what they really were dealing with.

No more giving the USN a 1943 SBD and the Japanese a 1937 Val for the Midway setup.  Its stilting enough as it is.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2002, 11:20:13 AM »
Whats all this stuff about japanese getting "inferior planes" ?
I prefer val over SBD,a6m2 over f4f, and kate would hold up pretty good i think, not to mention it would be the only single engine plane other than the TBM to carry a torp..

I find it pretty easy to shoot down that 1943 SBD in a 1937 Val!
I've even shot down spits,f4fs,a few f6fs,fm2s,p40s some other planes in the val!

Here are my kill stats with val in CT (not all that impressive but hey for the last 5-6 weeks its been all 1943+!!!!!!)
  KILLS                    Deaths
D3A1=12              D3A1=33

at least 10 of those deaths were from aa and accidents like hitting tower on runway though!!lol :D
« Last Edit: October 13, 2002, 11:32:11 AM by cajun »

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2002, 11:33:54 AM »
Everyone don't fly D3A1.
B6N2 Jill would fit for MA and Events.

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2002, 11:36:28 AM »
! Even Mitsu disagrees!!!
Think I was doin lot better with my biplane polls! :D

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2002, 11:36:30 AM »
Of course B7A2 is deadly attacker for MA.
But it wound't fit for realistic events.

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2002, 11:38:29 AM »
I believe B5N2 is low priority plane, cajun.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2002, 03:21:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mitsu
Of course B7A2 is deadly attacker for MA.
But it wound't fit for realistic events.


Yeah, that's why I prefer the B6N2.  Its not as neat or as powerful, but it is much more realistic.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline J_A_B

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3012
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2002, 01:27:20 AM »
I actually like the Grace--not so much as an events plane, but as a plane that might see a reasonable amount of use in the MA, although its bombload is still inferior to the likes of the USN fighters.

But just liking an airplane isn't enough to see it get added....is there enough information available to do the job?  Cockpit view pics?  Speed/climb curves for all altitudes?  Stall speeds/handling properties?   The Grace was so rare that kind of quality info might not be available.

A B6N would be a comparible balance to the TBM for CT and events purposes so it would be IMO a better choice than a Kate if it comes down to being a choice between the two.

J_A_B

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2002, 02:01:24 AM »
I would be suprised if their were not enough info for the Grace. All the late war Japaneses planes got a good going over, and at least one( Grace) was sent to the US, I do beleave part of one is at the Pauel E Garber Facility, or was, I am Prety shure a Jill is their as well ( well at least one of them has been a while since I was their). AT any rate I do beleave enough data was taken both Visual and test to do a model of it ( the Grace), certainly the JIll.

  The Jill would certainly fit for Historical events better than the Grace, but to tell you the truth I have been so hoared out making do with what I have(plane set wise) for "Historical" events as a CT staffer that puting a grace in for a Jill wouldent even make me Blush now:)

 I do wish we could see some of the late war Japanese Wounder weapons, the Zenith of their endevours, planes like the Grace, the Ki 102, the Ki 84, and other planes unique to Japan like the Emily superlative examples of their types, much the same as we have seen for Germany and England and of course the US.

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Poll: Would you like to see B5NKate?
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2002, 03:40:22 AM »
kate was a good plane in airwarrior 3,,but it is slow and more importaint planes should be shoved in there,,anothere good plane was the oscar:)