Author Topic: Ta 152 charts, test and comparison tests. (Read 1104 times)

Toad · « **Reply #60 on:** September 20, 2002, 07:42:00 PM »

Here's the problem. You can "fudge" FM so that it will hit that particular point. But you don't really want an artificial "bump" in the graph do you?

Wouldn't you rather have the entire equation reworked so that EVERY point on the graph is good?

That's why I suggest you folks get the numbers at the cardinal altitudes on the AH chart. So Pyro can get the "big picture" on how the curves differ.

BTW, that number keeps coming up. Just what chart is it from and what is the "authenticity" (if you will) of the chart? Some charts are "official" projections of what the engineer think it will do before the first rivet is driven. Some charts are prototype tests. Some charts are production model tests.

Which one is that? I don't read German, so I'll have to take your word for it.

Glasses · « **Reply #61 on:** September 22, 2002, 12:05:42 AM »

Wilbus · « **Reply #62 on:** October 10, 2002, 03:54:40 AM »

Scot · « **Reply #63 on:** October 10, 2002, 08:17:56 AM »

Wilbus,

I have this kicking around thought I would share with you. I like this chart because it shows the various engine setups.

And please no more Kurk Tank invented comments.. .

Wilbus · « **Reply #64 on:** October 10, 2002, 08:22:13 AM »

Yes I have that chart too, I've posted it in this thread already. But why do you post it? Very hard to read your green text.

Scot · « **Reply #65 on:** October 10, 2002, 08:26:07 AM »

Sorry, must have missed it. It's hard to read because I had to reduce the size.

Wilbus · « **Reply #66 on:** October 23, 2002, 06:42:20 PM »

~~Scot~~