Author Topic: HTC sold to ..... (Read 3040 times)

Dead Man Flying · « **Reply #30 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:00:10 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by minus
if you people, so well speaking english, explain me , why it need 3 x 30 mm to kill a paratroper

[/b]

Because you can't aim.

-- Todd/Leviathn

minus · « **Reply #31 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:03:18 AM »

deadman i was not speaking about aim , damit !man ! you ALSO have problems with ENGLISH ? you cant read ?

hits=aim ??? loks wery similar ????

Kanth · « **Reply #32 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:04:18 AM »

You may want to reword that so that he can understand it Levi.

because aim???????? have not, you NEED!!!

minus · « **Reply #33 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:07:41 AM »

another 1 who have problems now to recognize numbers:rolleyes:

if i write need 3x30 mm becose trops die after 3 hits from 30 mm and when mean hits , it show on FE the hit sprite,

hope not to complicated for native english speaking people;)

Dead Man Flying · « **Reply #34 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:12:05 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by minus
deadman i was not speaking about aim , damit !man ! you ALSO have problems with ENGLISH ? you cant read ?

[/B]

Calling what you write "English" is a stretch. Maybe "Frenglish" would better describe it.

Quote

hits=aim ??? loks wery similar ????

I'm fairly certain that paratroopers, like bailed pilots, require you to shoot the person and not the chute in order to kill them. As such it's possible that you were hitting the chute and registering hits, but you weren't doing any actual damage.

Hence the need to improve your aim. Why you would waste 30mm for the job is beyond me when a single well-shot .303 is enough to kill a paratrooper or bailed pilot.

-- Todd/Leviathn

minus · « **Reply #35 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:15:57 AM »

dead man , , just be sure , i learned from beta until now how and where to aim to kils paratropers,

Dead Man Flying · « **Reply #36 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:19:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by minus
dead man , , just be sure , i learned from beta until now how and where to aim to kils paratropers,

Obviously, you have not learned well enough.

-- Todd/Leviathn

minus · « **Reply #37 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:31:08 AM »

maybe you right ,with 30 mm i not learned , but can asure you i will not have problems with your prefered spitfire

SOB · « **Reply #38 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:40:58 AM »

It's not the poor English that makes it good, Minus, it's the whine combined with the poor English. Without the critical whine ingredient, it just wouldn't be so funny.

Maintenant continuer avec votre lamenter, Moins, mais se souvenir d'ils ne sont pas seulement des cavaliers, ils sont des cavaliers super!

Blank, for an appropriately incoherent translation of what I wrote to you, translate it to English at: http://www.freetranslation.com/ That's also what I used to translate my English into horrible French

SOB

minus · « **Reply #39 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:45:52 AM »

actualy you say whine ? for who is it a whine ? for some hapy alied nice jockejs ?

bah man wake up , and do not bother me with word like whine , honestly i em not realy sure what a hell it realy means, your whine

i find it AH porked if you like it or not and punt on it ! is it my opinion and not whine or whatever word

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #40 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:49:06 AM »

Minus, you are making accusations with no proof or hard data -> whining.
-SW

minus · « **Reply #41 on:** November 04, 2002, 11:56:34 AM »

profe my i em gilty !! about making accusations with no proof

,where are your proof about i em wrong ? nowhere ! so let it out

i anderstud you try me explain why is it define like whine, but is it something new when some people need infinitie proofs to finaly admit something wrong ?

ah change , after mostly 3 years is it never the same , but all the time it was klaimed is it corect , AH will change, i hope !

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #42 on:** November 04, 2002, 12:00:43 PM »

Why do I need proof to prove that you are wrong, while you have no proof to prove that HTC is wrong?

It's the other way around, you need to prove something is wrong rather than what you think it is.
-SW

minus · « **Reply #43 on:** November 04, 2002, 12:09:30 PM »

wery simple , presumed guilty or inocent ?????

how is it work in USA ?

maybe i acuse HTC to be guilty, but you and others also acuse me to be guilty

sugesting whiners about whine , before you come whine about whine brink some hard data !!!!

becose we are presumed inocents

Turbot · « **Reply #44 on:** November 04, 2002, 12:11:22 PM »

I am not sure how HTC models damage to paratroopers. I have tried in times past (when REALLY bored) to experiement with hitting them in different spots from GV and plane. It doesn't seem to matter. Those suckers are tough !

I could be nuts but I do not beleive it is true you have to hit only the man. Hitting the big part of the parachute seems to do it for me as well as any other spot, but they do need a few hits in my experience. (especially easier to see and test with Ostwind or M16 with tracers turned off)

(An animation of the guy falling from the chute would be a nice detail - but probabaly too much gore for HTC)