Author Topic: Screenies  (Read 380 times)

Offline Zipper9

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
Screenies
« on: November 05, 2002, 12:10:13 PM »

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
Screenies
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2002, 12:25:02 PM »
hey zipper? is this the right forum for your fanboy plugs?

and yes, that B-17 looks retarded.

Offline RafBader

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Screenies
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2002, 12:31:28 PM »
I have seen better screenies on my back door :D



 RafBader

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Screenies
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2002, 12:50:24 PM »
fa has a few better looking terrains and the strat model they use is far superior to ah.

The plane models and fm are crap.

Gameplay even in the easy rooms is about the same as the ah main.

3 months free with a new account.

Aint worth the dl'd imho.........

Offline Matt1221b

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 132
Screenies
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2002, 01:53:44 PM »
i think those graphics suck and the setup of the game sucks, the graphics are horrible, they look like CFS 1 graphics and those plane paint schemes are the worst, AH is definatly better....i would undoubatly pay 50$ for this game, but since its free that makes it even better....AH must have worked really really hard on this game and warbirds is nothing compared to this

Offline Flossy

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11070
      • Flossy's Website
Screenies
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2002, 02:01:02 PM »
No wonder they only show those screenshots in a small size - imagine what they would look like full screen!  :p  Give me AH any day!  :rolleyes:
Flossy {The Few}
Female Flying For Fun

Offline Joc

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 857
Screenies
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2002, 02:16:16 PM »
FA sucks dead sheeps woolly bits....thats really all I have to say about that.......:D
Joc

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Screenies
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2002, 02:24:25 PM »
Hey, this looks great! Downloading it on my sons computer soon as I get home! (AH flight model is just a tad advanced for him, he loves flying around in FA 2.0 that he's got on his box, the FM suits a 6 yr. old just fine!)

Offline Midnight

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1809
      • http://www.brauncomustangs.org
Screenies
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2002, 04:20:15 PM »
Are those supposed to be computer screen shots or water color paintings?

Offline Fancy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 294
Screenies
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2002, 04:39:48 PM »
Graphics are secondary (or even tertiary) to me.  And those graphics look like ass.  So what if the resolution on the textures is a little tighter when the actual texture looks like buttcheese.  In fact, if the texture looks like an asscrack, then it's better to have lower resolution.

There are a few things that really keep me about AH.  One is the little gameplay facets that go unnoticed most of the time but yet support smooth gameplay.  (Like the storing of head positions and loadout/convergence settings for each individual plane.)  One other is that AH successfully transmits an atmosphere.  Each plane is so well modelled (performance wise) that flying it even competently requires much practice.  So, each engagement creates tension for me.  I know there are so many great pilots out there that I truly fear for my safety when engaging.  Other games are, to use an AH jingoism, too gamey.  You just get a bunch of kids that find that one little thing it takes to dominate everyone else and they'll repeatedly do that thing over and over again.  It takes quite a bit of a lot of things to keep your nose above water here no matter what plane you're in.   AHers and the HTC team.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Screenies
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2002, 04:52:14 PM »
Doesn't have the same look as AH... can't say if the difference in appearance is more than skin deep.





There are more full size screens shots here:
http://www.fighterace.info/FA3/arena.htm


FWIW... I've played around with FA1, FA2 and FA3. I don't like the feel of it.
sand

Offline RightF00T

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1943
Screenies
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2002, 08:07:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
Doesn't have the same look as AH... can't say if the difference in appearance is more than skin deep.

[



Sandman, is that one of the motherships from Independence Day arriving over head in the 2nd pic?

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Screenies
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2002, 08:17:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by RightF00T



Sandman, is that one of the motherships from Independence Day arriving over head in the 2nd pic?


Not a clue... I assumed it was some sort of explosion... I haven't seen it before.
sand

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Screenies
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2002, 08:18:45 PM »
Rightfoot, that's what the wingman of the last Japanese 2-ship of fighters launched to intercept a lone B-29 over tokyo saw...
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Screenies
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2002, 09:07:07 PM »
Is that what that's supposed to be, a nuke?

I didn't know FA-3 had nukes.
sand