Author Topic: Post WWII  (Read 2469 times)

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Post WWII
« Reply #60 on: December 10, 2002, 02:35:14 PM »
Quote
B-29 is a lot faster than the heavies in AH - 357MPH@30,000' according to Joe Baugher and heavily armed as well. also it was a very rugged plane. a single 109 might not be able to bring down a Dreamboat
ya,,a 109 mite not be able to catch that plane at high alts,,i heard after the enola gay dropped its nuke,,it had so much power it could out clime any ww2 fighter at the time,,lol


pby cat,,now that owuld be tons of fun!! and i too think thats the b29 russian copy,lol,,,the red kinda gives it away

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Post WWII
« Reply #61 on: December 10, 2002, 05:03:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Andijg
Looks like one of the "Ruskie" copies of the B-29.
TU-2 BULL ?


WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thats the Tu-4 Bull.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2002, 12:53:32 AM by Ike 2K# »

Offline Puke

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 759
      • http://members.cox.net/barking.pig/puke.htm
Post WWII
« Reply #62 on: December 10, 2002, 05:30:44 PM »
BGB,  thanks for the kind reply.  I have to admit that Vietnam is a much preferred topic for me than WW2.  The numbers I provided was for an early AIM-9B, but I also left out gimbal limits and their limitations (how fast the seeker head can move and how far in order to track a target) and a few other things.  I think it did provide an idea that these missiles were far from "wonder weapons."  Interestingly though, even the "Last Of The Gunfighers" (i.e., the F-8 Crusader) scored most of its kills by far with sidewinders than guns.

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Post WWII
« Reply #63 on: December 10, 2002, 06:43:05 PM »
Puke..i just moved into new home..Its very sweet in the sierra nevada foothills and over looks Central California Flatlands...

well i cant get cable..so i "had" to get Satelite..well i now have Discovery Wings...I just wacthed an episode on Missiles in Vietnam...Very good...
the ratio on staying alive aftr a 100 mision run was 1-3..and even as low as 1-2...DAM!!..thats not good..they said Korea had somthn liek a 1-10 and higher ration of living...thru a tour...


I always say..dam a wild weasel pilot has got soem serious nerves to continue to seek out SAM sites...omg..bless there souls and the ones flying now...

Dam what a mess war is....

Salute BiGB
xoxo

P.S. I take it there are no Flight Sims liek AH that are Jet era??

o yaa.. we hijaked this thread..lolo

P.P.S.. This message is for Bish & Rook...KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK!! Its the Knights Weapons Inspector..Let us in!!!!!!hehehe
:D

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Post WWII
« Reply #64 on: December 10, 2002, 07:03:08 PM »
Quote
they said Korea had somthn liek a 1-10 and higher ration of living...thru a tour...
 thats what usa said atleast,,according to the russians it was a 1 to 5 ratio in the mig favor,lol..usa said it was a 1 to 10 in a sabers favor,,,each country in that war says there fighter out flew eachothere,,lol<~~no one wants to admit there fighter is worse,, or pilots are worse,lol
Quote
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thats the Tu-4
not any diffrence,,its still a ripped off b29 is all:)

Offline Puke

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 759
      • http://members.cox.net/barking.pig/puke.htm
Post WWII
« Reply #65 on: December 11, 2002, 12:54:52 AM »
BGBMaw,

I wish I saw that program.  I have the Disc Wings Ch and I'm sure I'll see it at some point.  But some of those numbers are odd and I don't know what to make of them.  It sounds like they are survival ratios rather than kill ratios as Hyena interprets.  Still, that's a hard thing to quantify because the threats and tactics changed so much.  Shoot, from most of 1968-1972 there were no missions into North Vietnam and so right there the chances of survival would have increased.  But some of the dark days of 1965-66 would see high loss rates due to tactics of coming in low in range of small-arms and AAA.  And then even the services would see differences because the USMC mainly flew in SVN whereas the USAF flew into both SVN and NVN and the USN mostly flew into NVN.  Anyway, if you start finding an interest in the Vietnam War than I am very pleased.  I find it incredibly fascinating and have been studying it for years.  

Though the Vietnam War really is a jet war, it's not with the same technology we have today.  I'd say the F-4 Phantom is most representative of the war and it was there from day-1 to the last day of that war.  But it's first flight was in 1958 at a time when t.v. was black-&-white, slide rules were used instead of calculators as well as vacuum tube technology.  Missiles combat was new too and in fact really designed to shoot down lumbering bombers.  And the dogfights are no less exciting when you read about them.  Cunningham/Drisoll's 3rd, 4th and 5th MiG kills (in one mission is classic) as is Curt Dose's chase of a MiG-21 over an enemy airfield at tree-top height and the fact that after his victory he's alive because some sharp ECM people jammed all enemy detonation (instead of tracking frequencies) as he was egressing.  

I can really go on and on about this stuff.  Do not even tempt me.  Just ask Sour.  I got blamed for talking to the ex F-4 Phantom Pilot about his old mount for too long at the last Aces High Convention museum visit which bored the prop-heads.   lol

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Post WWII
« Reply #66 on: December 11, 2002, 12:18:34 PM »
lolPuke...

Yes i find all wars very interseting...im just studying mucjh more ww2 just beacuase the scope is so large involving much mor eof the world..but I always want to be knowledgable on all World affairs...

Yes it was a survival ratio they talked about..ANd im sure you will see it on D wings..as i noticed they repeat the same programs frequently...

Just fifnished reading an Air Commando book..tracing history of Air Commandos....OMG..what they were doing in Vietnam is amazing....Going along teh Ho-Chi trail..and exchanging Cases of AK rounds with defective ones so it wouod ruin guns...

Lord what a mess in a jungle....

Salute
BiGB
xoxo


oy a...and for this posts..ummm......YEs Bring the ..ummmm ,,F-4...and the AC-130 to AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..lolollo...:)

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Post WWII
« Reply #67 on: December 11, 2002, 05:45:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BGBMAW
lolPuke...

Yes i find all wars very interseting...im just studying mucjh more ww2 just beacuase the scope is so large involving much mor eof the world..but I always want to be knowledgable on all World affairs...

Yes it was a survival ratio they talked about..ANd im sure you will see it on D wings..as i noticed they repeat the same programs frequently...

Just fifnished reading an Air Commando book..tracing history of Air Commandos....OMG..what they were doing in Vietnam is amazing....Going along teh Ho-Chi trail..and exchanging Cases of AK rounds with defective ones so it wouod ruin guns...

Lord what a mess in a jungle....

Salute
BiGB
xoxo


oy a...and for this posts..ummm......YEs Bring the ..ummmm ,,F-4...and the AC-130 to AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..lolollo...:)




Discovery Wings Channel is like watching recorded shows on my VHS now. I bet you've watched "Bear Trap" for a thousand times.

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Post WWII
« Reply #68 on: December 11, 2002, 08:31:26 PM »
Quote
I wish I saw that program. I have the Disc Wings Ch and I'm sure I'll see it at some point. But some of those numbers are odd and I don't know what to make of them. It sounds like they are survival ratios rather than kill ratios as Hyena interprets. Still, that's a hard thing to quantify because the threats and tactics changed so much. Shoot, from most of 1968-1972 there were no missions into North Vietnam and so right there the chances of survival would have increased.
<~~thats pretty much what i was tring to say,,with out having to type it all,,very well put:)


on the history channel is were i got that info,,i was watching it one day,,and it had mig and saber pilots talking,,and all the mig pilots said there plane was better and got more kills,,and the saber pilots said the same thing,,,on the show they determed it was pretty equal fights,,,sabers little faster,,but didnt clime as good or turn as well,,but usa had better trained pilots over all  then the korean's had,,besides the russian pilots on loan to them<~~very good pilots,,,some mean jet battles over there,,some of the dog fight footage is wild:D
« Last Edit: December 13, 2002, 01:27:49 PM by hyena426 »

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Post WWII
« Reply #69 on: December 12, 2002, 02:09:38 PM »
lol ike..yes im starting to notice that..

lolol..

Great desert storm footage..and Bosnia tto
Salute BiGB
xoxo

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Post WWII
« Reply #70 on: December 13, 2002, 07:41:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BGBMAW
lol ike..yes im starting to notice that..

lolol..

Great desert storm footage..and Bosnia tto
Salute BiGB
xoxo


I like the program in D-Wings channel called the "Bear Trap" and "Flying tank". These 2 programs tells us how the Soviet Union collapsed which started in war in Afganistan back in 79 and ended in 89.

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Post WWII
« Reply #71 on: December 13, 2002, 08:03:17 PM »
think aces high would let us have one of these?,,hehehehe j/k

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Post WWII
« Reply #72 on: December 13, 2002, 10:58:02 PM »
Russians sorta stole a crash-landed B29 near end of war..before long..they magically had a new bomber series..also big coincidence that Bear looks like B36....
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Post WWII
« Reply #73 on: December 14, 2002, 01:45:16 AM »
when will Hollywood make a movie about war in Afganistan in the 80s. we want to see the Soviet version of the vietnam war.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What russians used in afgan war (1979 to 1989):

Mi-24 Hind
Mi-8 hip
Su-25 frogfoot
MiG-21s
MiG-23/27 floggers

What U.S.A used in Vietnam War (1965-1974)

UH-1 Huey
huey cobras
F-4 phantoms
F-8 crusaders
F-105 thunderchiefs (the THUD)
A-4s
A-6s

and thats it!!!!!!

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Post WWII
« Reply #74 on: December 14, 2002, 05:25:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ike 2K#
when will Hollywood make a movie about war in Afganistan in the 80s....


what? u never see rambo 3?