Author Topic: Can you imaging how large... (Read 698 times)

mietla · « **on:** December 05, 2002, 06:36:20 PM »

... 99! is?

Staga · « **Reply #1 on:** December 05, 2002, 07:15:34 PM »

I'm speachless.

funkedup · « **Reply #2 on:** December 05, 2002, 07:55:10 PM »

I'm still imagining. Will check back tomorrow.

Aaron · « **Reply #3 on:** December 05, 2002, 11:02:03 PM »

Yes I can imagine, it's about:

9.332621544394415268169923885 627 x 10^155

So there you go, no more imagining. Now get back to work.

-Aaron

whgates3 · « **Reply #4 on:** December 05, 2002, 11:46:56 PM »

its amazing how you can write down a number that is larger than the estimated number of particles in the [observable] universe ( 10^87 ) on such a small bit of space (5 ascii characters - 40 bits - on the hard drive)...John Napier (inventor of exponential notation) certainly the greatest math genius ever - much much better than gauss...factorial notation is much less discreet & therefore less powerful ( but slightly more dense if the number you need hapens to be a perfect factorial, or you need the most bang for your proverbial buck) - invented by John Wallis, who, compared to Napier, was a loser

CyranoAH · « **Reply #5 on:** December 06, 2002, 05:55:31 AM »

Easy, it's the number of results in "Google!" if you do a search for "sex".

Daniel

Animal · « **Reply #6 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:17:06 AM »

its... almost 100...

Nifty · « **Reply #7 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:33:44 AM »

it's the number of times you've masturbated this week???

fffreeze220 · « **Reply #8 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:35:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by whgates3
its amazing how you can write down a number that is larger than the estimated number of particles in the [observable] universe ( 10^87 ) on such a small bit of space (5 ascii characters - 40 bits - on the hard drive)...John Napier (inventor of exponential notation) certainly the greatest math genius ever - much much better than gauss...factorial notation is much less discreet & therefore less powerful ( but slightly more dense if the number you need hapens to be a perfect factorial, or you need the most bang for your proverbial buck) - invented by John Wallis, who, compared to Napier, was a loser

Go take ur pills

fffreeze220 · « **Reply #9 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:35:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by CyranoAH
Easy, it's the number of results in "Google!" if you do a search for "sex".

Daniel

No thats 999.999.999.999.999 pages i tried it

Animal · « **Reply #10 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:41:49 AM »

I am so bored

Ripsnort · « **Reply #11 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:45:10 AM »

LOL Animal!

fffreeze220 · « **Reply #12 on:** December 06, 2002, 08:47:12 AM »

me too

dang my search took longer then urs. I wasted 0.02 seconds of my life not watching porn

whgates3 · « **Reply #13 on:** December 06, 2002, 02:08:11 PM »

"Searched the web for food. Results 1 - 20 of about 47,500,000"
"Searched the web for shelter. Results...about 3,250,000"
"Searched the web for water. Results...about 58,800,000"

so we've still not yet put survival over procreation

funkedup · « **Reply #14 on:** December 06, 2002, 02:10:22 PM »

Search for Masturbation: Results 1 - 10 of about 6,200,000

Whew there is hope for us yet. I guess this explains the homeless problem.