Author Topic: Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(  (Read 660 times)

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« on: December 05, 2002, 07:37:24 PM »
No other way i can put it nicely fellas, but enuf is enuf. :(

Autoretract flaps... nothing done about them. :( :(

The one plane that lives by their flaps and they get screwed in a fight because flaps retract on their own making the plane either spin or lose manouverability just because the speed ticker hits an exact speed mark (250) even though the 38 is pulling nose up or pulling a tight turn and that speed is only achieved for a split second.

Please remove the autoretract function for the 38, the flaps neither folded up on their own by automation nor by windforce, the 38 had locks to prevent deployment past 250mph, but if they were deployed, they stayed deployed until retracted by the pilot. Rip them off at 300mph for all I care, just dont make them retract.

No new 38 models...when almost every other plane has them. :( :( :(

Self explanatory.

This since I can remember being in AH.

Only fix i remember on the plane was the uberweak tail/1-shot-dead-engines issue, and it seems it took the 190 folks to pitch in to get this looked at, as their engine also died to a single hit back then. :confused:

Very disheartening for me

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2002, 08:08:37 PM »
It took me fully three minutes to figure out that you were talking about the P-38.

I'm getting old....
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline tgnr2001

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2002, 12:29:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
It took me fully three minutes to figure out that you were talking about the P-38.

I'm getting old....


:D At first I was looking for the other 37 issues.

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2002, 05:31:21 AM »
Who is OIO?!

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2002, 11:16:41 AM »
I have absolutely NO id what yer all talking about but I just say this cause I need many posts to impress y'all :D

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2002, 05:10:06 PM »
Watashi wa Tac desu Mitsu sama! ;)

To the above poster, the "J" model of the 38 was lighter and faster than the "L" model. Id like a J.

The earlier variants would be nice to have, just for the same reasons we have spit 1 and V and 109 E and F's and early & late zero & 'cats. :D

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2002, 10:20:44 PM »
So, where are the self-appointed "whiner hunters" now?

 Swulfe? Toad? Where are you guys?

 ...

 ROFL.

 ...

 ps) I'd like the auto-retract out of the way, too.

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2002, 03:12:10 AM »
There are more planes that suffer from the same flap issue, the 109 is one of them. It should be able to use it flaps in 220 mph, as it is now max speed is 160 which means it can't use flaps at all in 95% of the turns fights.

Last time I asked HT/PYRO about it there was a clear NO to fixing this as they would have to modell flaps being dammaged if overspeed.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2002, 04:43:05 AM »
Whoa!

HTC is this true just in the way Wotan said it? If the Bf109 can use flaps up to 220mph and you are not modeling it now, how come you model P51 and F4U flaps at speeds much higher than that and they have no overspeed damage- they just auto retract at maximum allowed speed?

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2002, 06:29:21 AM »
No GUNERZER it is not true. 2 Questions are being mixed with 1 answere.

On the auto retract flaps question, it seems to me that everone who wants to get rid of auto retract flaps wan'ts flaps at faster speeds. If we were to get rid of the auto retract flaps the only difference would be ,instead of retracting the flap it would be damaged and unsible at the same speed they auto retract now.

The other questions is on a specific planes flap speed, they are set on a per plane basis with the data we have availble.


HiTech

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2002, 06:51:53 AM »
ohh....since you are here HiTech...

I heard rumors from the folks at the con that the P47M is beeing modeled..

Can you please confirm or deny this? :)

The P47M/N has been on my wish list for the 2 years i have been playing now so id just like a small hint :)  

PLEASE !!:)

You dont have to say what releas it is gonna be in, just a little hint... promise that i wont bug you on the issue ever again if you answer ;)
« Last Edit: December 07, 2002, 06:53:55 AM by Nilsen »

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2002, 07:09:33 AM »
Thanks for clearing that up hitech.

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2002, 09:05:50 AM »
Thanks for the answer HT.

May I suggest that since it appears your data reflects the "safe" deployment speeds, maybe we could have the flaps be deployed only at or below those speed, BUT have the autoretract feature kick in 50 or 80 mph above said "safe" deployment speed?

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2002, 10:32:33 AM »
Grunherz, 109's could deploy flaps at 160mph and bellow, it could have them deployed at 220mph and bellow though. It could not extend them at more then 160 mph.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline NHawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1787
Very Unhappy with HTC on 38 issues. =(
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2002, 12:47:29 PM »
After speaking to a couple of mechanics from WWII, there was no such thing as auto retract flaps on 99% of planes. So, for the sake of realism remove them and model damage if used improperly. :)
Most of the people you meet in life are like slinkies. Pretty much useless, but still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
-------------------------------
Sometimes I think I have alzheimers. But then I forget about it and it's not a problem anymore.