Pongo said:why not give the drivers hatch view..people will get really sick of loosing tigers to schrubs..
Yeah, this is my main beef with the Tiger as well. How come you can't raise the driver's head position above the top of the hull like you can in the PzIV and as you're stuck with using the Tiger's own hull MG? Hell, it's risky just driving out of the VH and turning too soon, hitting the camo netting and dying.
But the main problem here is, there are things out there that rightly kill ditching planes but wrongly kill AFVs. There is no way hitting a tiny pebble or a tree should utterly destroy any of the vehicles in AH. That needs to be fixed more than the Tiger's driver's view IMHO.
Do any tanks really move so far off borsight when you shoot the main armement? like its way way off....seems exagerated..
Well, usually you're zoomed way in when you're shooting so the effects of recoil are going to look much worse than they really are.
Perk tanks should have a better range finding sight...
How so? The only rangefinders that WW2 tanks had were marks on the sight reticle and the old Mark I Mod 0 eyeball. True, our current reticle has no marks on it dedicated to rangefinding, but with a little practice you can use the marks we have for that purpose. Which in fact is no different at all from what they did in WW2

.