Author Topic: Hey HiTech, are 163's set to randomly blow up in the MA?  (Read 1695 times)

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
Hey HiTech, are 163's set to randomly blow up in the MA?
« Reply #45 on: January 15, 2003, 12:05:51 AM »
Tumor- how can something possibly blow up when there is no fuel in it?

an empty feul tank is more dangerous than a full in terms of explosion danger

Offline JANNERIK

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Me 163
« Reply #46 on: January 15, 2003, 07:08:00 AM »
Me 163
facts from discovery channel

allies shot down : 7

34 % of all damaged /shot down me-163s was due to landing/xploding /



I looked at jet special WWII on discovery channel last night , and they took a look at me.262 and 163 , bith Me-163 A and B

There was made 1400 Me-163Bs ( A was prototype ) but only 400 was put in to the war . The fuel thing T and C or whatever was allso showed and how they refueld the planes . they got 2 teams with fuel , first one goes in and refuel and other team . They allso got special vehicles to bring back the planes after landing(on fields /grass ) .
They allso say that some did xplode in air but most right after fuel was put in . And that some times they actual killed the pilot by melting the bulletproof glass.

Whats interesting tho is that due to ME-163 Kommet  inventor (lipsiig or whatever ) we got the sabre planes and the apollo :)

Allso due to the fact that there speed was so high they ( poor trained pilots did a 8 hour intensive traning) didnt have time to aim on enemy planes , lol 7 victorys with 400 planes and who know how many sorties .


Think i got the nummbers right  :)

JANN

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
Hey HiTech, are 163's set to randomly blow up in the MA?
« Reply #47 on: January 15, 2003, 11:09:37 AM »
Bug- a gas tank... are C-Stoff fumes more potent than gasoline?

Jannerik- Discovery Channel shows tend to be very wrong. It's actually a higher % lost to accidents... but the exploding was due to airframe damage, not random or from a normal landing.. there was a 163 pilot that set his plane down so hard it broke his back... plane didn't explode... guess the fumes weren't as volitile as people say?

BTW Rudy Opitz was a 163 test pilot. His word holds more weight than Discovery Wings or any book.
-SW