Hitech, not at all refering to roll rate, I find nothing wrong with it at all, nor do I find anything wrong with the other 190's roll rate nor the the 109's roll rate.
Did alot of tests comparing the Spit 5 and 9 to the 190 A5 (A5 being better then A3 which was used in R/L) and the Spit (both of them) outperformed the 190 in almost every way except maximum level speed. The 190 was said by both pilots who flew it, those who encountered it and those RAF test pilots who flew it to be a much better accelerating aircraft in dives, much better then spit 5 in level flight and slightly better then the Spit 9 in level flight (acceleration wise). Pulling up from a high speed dive it outzoomed the Spit 5 with eas, as did it from level flight. The spit 9 was almost as good when pulled up from level flight while the 190 was quite much better when pulled up from a high speed dive. The Turn rate of the 190 was no match for the spit and both spits could easily outturn it.
I have the test reports if you like them, they exist on the web aswell. So really, after reading test reports, combat reports by RAF and LW pilots, test reports from RLM and Focke Wulf there is really no way I can be convinced the flight modell of the 190 and Ta152 is right (Ta152 should btw have its maximum speed at 41,000 feet where the Jumo 213 E-1 using GM1 had its best altitude, ours have it at 31,000 feet) in AH.
By saying this, I don't say that AH is bad, I love it and I always have since the first day I played it, a few hours after the Beta was released. it's the best online flight sim there has ever been and will be for a good deal of time in the future.
I don't in anyway think there is some kind of anti Luftwaffe conspiracy, this only seams like a bad defence for alot of people who don't know what I am talking about. The 109's feel really good and they are just as bad in high speed as I expect them to be (again, after test reports that seam to line up very well with AH 109 FM). The 262 is exelent as is the 163 (too good as we don't have to suffer engine failures).
But I do think you need to look over your Focke Wulf 190/Ta152 numbers again, maybe twice too. If nothing else, it is quite clear that the 190's needed no trimming while flying, not in dives or level flight. Sure this could be countered by combat trim but should it have too?
