US planes in Il-2 a true test ? Yes, I tend to agree to a point, actually. A true test on Soviet data on mentioned planes, but not more than that.
So far I've seen Oleg's posts where he states some fairly low airspeeds for P51 (410 mph for short periods, if I remember correctly). Also, he said if you expect the P47 to be great low level dogfighter, you are in for a nasty surprise. However, he said that at high alt P51 is better than 109K (which he seems to qualify as one of the best planes of the war). We'll know more in February.
LW planes have their share of problems, but the thing seems to be blown out of proportion aswell. I'll name few: engine overheats far quicker on LW planes than VVS (recent discussion at UBI shows just how wrong this is), G-6 is unbelieveably poor plane for unknown reason, sometimes Yaks don't get engine damage, 190 compresses much more than in AH. All this is my experience, I might even be wrong, but I know that Il-2 qualities outweigh them (for me). Not much different than AH issues, if you ask me. Still, I can hold my own fairly well in 190 even against cheating AI. I even remember being accused of liking Il-2 because LW planes are uber there (it was on this board

). No, I like it because of its accuracy and attention to detail.
What annoys me is the cliche statements of 'propaganda and lies', a sim 'trying to rewrite history', 'communist' etc. So, they made such a great sim, but it is in fact a plot to undermine Western planes and show how good Soviet planes actually were. Now, why would someone do that ? Maybe Oleg is just doing promotion for Russian aircraft industry ?
