Anyone listen to,

[GtoRA2]

Michael Savage? The radio guy?

Here is his web site.

Savage Nation

[Ripsnort]

Yep.

[GtoRA2]

I think he is interesting, some times a tad extreme.

[Gunthr]

Yes. Phil Hendrie too.

Savage is ok. Not as informative as some local hosts.

[Ripsnort]

I much prefer Shawn Hannity.  I also listen to the local Liberal Dave on KIRO here in Seattle for a perspective from the other side.  Seems to balance out my fits of laughs and rage.

[miko2d]

Michael Savage is fun to listen too but not very smart. If you have education and share his position, you will suffer some times. It's not as revolting when an ideological enemy says obvious crap. When someone on your side does it, it hurts.

 Hannity is much better - as long as you realise that he stands on religious position.  Allowing for that, he is quite consistent in most cases. Still he too often misses obvious points. I often think "I could have rebuttled that liberal caller much better"...

 Steve Molsberg seems to be the smartest one of conservative guys so far. He hosts a show with Richard Bey (liberal) in NY area, right after Hannity.

 miko

[Airhead]

GTO, you ever listen to Bernie Ward on KGO?

[GtoRA2]

Yeah, I listen to him sometimes too, lol he can be fun.

[weazel]

"Sean Hannity (R-Punk bellybutton whiner)

 Lately I mentioned that I'm no good at manufacturing outrage.
 Something either pisses me off or it doesn't,, but then, I'm no Sean Hannity.

 Last night on the drive home, I hear this panty-waist whining about SUVs.
 He mentioned that Arianna Huffington said that SUVs fund terrorism.

 Then he fabricated all this OUTRAGE!!! like somebody went on TV
 and showed a whole bunch of nudie pics of him and his wife doing the nasty.

 Don't get me wrong - I realize he's a self-indulgent, money-grubbing media potato who is trying
 to gin up some interest in something to make his phones ring, and with Clinton's zipper reduced to
 only half his show, Hannity has to change harmless subjects into the next "great outrage."

 Well Sean, let me explain how things work:

 I assume the SUVs-funds-terrorism riff is a rebuttal to the ridiculous assertion that drugs
 fund terrorism, which President Happy Crack is trying to sell kids that are smarter than he is.

 I know some things about some drugs, and I can safely guarantee you that pot and cocaine are
 NOT coming to America thru the Middle East. So when Bush and his lying co-conspirators try
 to sell that to the kids, all they can do is laugh at what a total dork-o-rama had stolen the presidency.

 Sidebar:
 Surely hashish, opium and other less-than-mainstream drugs flow thru the region,
 but the regular street drugs the kids are doing don't travel thru Osama-land.

 But gasoline does.
 Each time you fill up that SUV, the Saudis give Osama a few pennies per gallon.
 September 11th was about gasoline.

 When we stopped pressuring Detroit to get better gas mileage, we were committing troops
 to die in the sand and that's a real outrage compared to the horseshit Hannity manufactured.

 So, you have my guarantee that purchasing pot and cocaine do NOT funnel cash to terrorists,
 but filling up your 12-miles-a-gallon SUV helps them without a doubt.

 And the Saudis aren't being asked to crack down on the Al Qaeda scumbags in their country
 because President Death needs Saudi goodwill to satisfy his unending erection for Iraq's oil fields."

Originally posted by Ripsnort
I much prefer Shawn Hannity.  I also listen to the local Liberal Dave on KIRO here in Seattle for a perspective from the other side.  Seems to balance out my fits of laughs and rage.