I see two possible motivating factors here:
1. The student was pushing the teacher's buttons, as kids will do in school. As an example, when I was going to junior high, we had a Civics teacher who was pretty tough. Staunch anti communist Civics teacher in the 7th grade. I had classes with this teacher up until the 10th grade...various subjects, mostly P.E. and homeroom. He was the school "enforcer."
By the time I got to 10th grade, my classmates and I had decided to have some fun with this teacher, in a friendly way, of course. This was a Christian school, and Communism was second only to the devil, as far as the evil on this world goes.
First thing we did was replace the American flag with the Russian hammer and sickle for the pledge of allegiance. I don't think he even noticed it 'til we started the pledge. He even allowed the commie flag to remain on the opposite side of the blackboard for a couple days...I think the principal questioned him about it, but he musta defended it (us) by saying it was part of the lesson plans. The next day, we (myself and three or four others) wore red hammer and sickle armbands, fabricated "Commie" brand construction paper cigarettes in a red box, and "smoked" them in class...even identified ourselves as the school Communist Society.
How did the teacher react to all this? He seemed to be humored by it....'til he sat down on the tacks in his chair. Even then, he didn't lose his cool. He was astute enough to smile about it, because he knew the whole thing for what it was...good natured. It was tailor made just for his benefit, and he knew it.
BTW...there was no paddling in this school. The most dreaded punishment was a 30 minute detention hall. As I recall, the toughest dude in the school was considered tough by us because he smoked. None of us got in any trouble whatsoever concerning the above. Probably because we weren't communists. We were 13.
2. Possibility on the part of the disruptive child's father to initiate a Civil Rights lawsuit against the school by using the child as a legal pawn to "test the waters" through provocative behavior. In other words, a scam initiated to either make money, gain notoriety, or intended to cause harm to traditional American values.
............................. ............................. ............................. ..................
Some have mentioned a violation of civil rights in this discussion. Please forgive my not understanding which civil rights have been violated. The Constitution has been mentioned, as well as the Bill of Rights. Which of these were violated?
Another question. Is there any weight to the student's rights issue on a constitutional level? Or is it more of a "proving ground" for testing limits by those who would undo our educational, and traditional belief system?
Thank you.
Les