Author Topic: nalpam (Read 827 times)

john9001 · « **on:** January 16, 2003, 06:14:06 PM »

so , when do we get nalpam to drop on the tigers?

ra · « **Reply #1 on:** January 16, 2003, 06:34:52 PM »

I love the smell of nalpam in the morning. It smells like vitcory.

whgates3 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 16, 2003, 08:30:35 PM »

smell of napalm is overmodeled

fats · « **Reply #3 on:** January 16, 2003, 08:59:54 PM »

"Napalm" what are you talking about? This thread is about nalpam and don't try hi-jack it! Stay on topic.

// fats

whgates3 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 16, 2003, 11:48:00 PM »

did i mispell something? that was too early in the afternoon for a my standard late evening booze enduced typos

Jester · « **Reply #5 on:** January 17, 2003, 01:16:00 AM »

Some Napalm would be nice - 1000lb. Bombs and 5" HARV rockets don't seem to have much effect on them.

john9001 · « **Reply #6 on:** January 17, 2003, 01:31:33 AM »

i spelled it "nalpam' so hitech would know what i was talking about.

whgates3 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 17, 2003, 02:33:06 AM »

to knock out armour, what we need is a variety of heads for the rockets...i was reading about US aerial rockets a few days ago@the library (looking for info in tiny tim). on othe the books i looked in had many pix of F4Us w/ rockets. they used a variety of them for different purposes: 3.5" ARs (Aerial Rockets) 2.75" SCARs (SubCaliber Aerial Rockets) & 5" HVARs (High Velocity Aerial Rockets). the rockets could be fitted with different heads. for armour they had a 6.5" armour piercing shape charge head that went on the HVARs. That should do the job on the Tigers...406th FG's web site says HVARS "...rang the death bell for the enemy Tiger tanks..."
SCARs would be nice for taking on field flak (not as heavy, so you could dogfight better with them under your wings)...there were proximity fused HVARs & ARs too...

BenDover · « **Reply #8 on:** January 17, 2003, 08:11:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
i spelled it "nalpam' so hitech would know what i was talking about.

lmao

Yeah, we need napalm to drop on laz's fields

frank3 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 20, 2003, 07:53:26 AM »

wasnt Napalm introduced during the Vietnam-war??

anyhow, would be nice tough...for infantry

Jester · « **Reply #10 on:** January 20, 2003, 08:07:54 AM »

WW2, used big time in the Pacific.

BenDover · « **Reply #11 on:** January 20, 2003, 11:15:20 AM »

*****Warning, sick joke*******

That means you can't sue me if you go any further down and read it.

You Americans sure do like dropping napalm on Orientals

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #12 on:** January 20, 2003, 11:39:03 AM »

Baby Killer!

Viper17 · « **Reply #13 on:** January 20, 2003, 02:59:31 PM »

HEHE. Crispy critters. Im all for napalm. Only USN and USMC craft should carry it though.

whgates3 · « **Reply #14 on:** January 21, 2003, 12:22:51 AM »

Jugs & Lightnings carried napalm in ETO & PTO