Author Topic: Humans Shielding Saddam (Read 1134 times)

ra · « **Reply #30 on:** January 21, 2003, 08:32:08 PM »

Quote

Regime is such a silly word.

Quote

(b)A government in power;

Thrawn is a silly word.

ra

ra · « **Reply #31 on:** January 21, 2003, 08:33:41 PM »

Quote

Who is the lady in the article a traitor to?

Canada.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #32 on:** January 21, 2003, 08:37:52 PM »

Oh well, if they were intelligent they would find better means of stopping bombs than themselves.
-SW

Thrawn · « **Reply #33 on:** January 21, 2003, 08:39:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ra
Canada.

Canada is not at war with Iraq.

(b)A government in power;

Have you ever used the term "the Bush regime" in a post? It sounds like another spinny, propaganda word. In western media you would see, "The Bush government" and "The Hussien regime. In the Iraq it would be the opposite.

Thrawn · « **Reply #34 on:** January 21, 2003, 08:53:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Oh well, if they were intelligent they would find better means of stopping bombs than themselves.
-SW

Like what?

Staga · « **Reply #35 on:** January 21, 2003, 09:07:22 PM »

Which one is having bigger cojones:
A) That woman heading to middle-east trying to stop the war with the way she feels is good or..
B) Grünhertz and some others squeaking about it and telling on the bulletinboard that she should die while doing that.

Some of you should wear a dress.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #36 on:** January 21, 2003, 09:13:09 PM »

Cardboard?

It'd be just as effective.
-SW

Thrawn · « **Reply #37 on:** January 21, 2003, 09:19:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Cardboard?

It'd be just as effective.
-SW

Reeeeally big fly swatters?

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #38 on:** January 21, 2003, 09:58:34 PM »

This is so unfashionable.... I mean it's been done

Hangtime · « **Reply #39 on:** January 21, 2003, 11:00:50 PM »

ummm... ok.... ummm... is she a hottie?? I mean, like... ummm.... is she butt ugly??

It could make a diffrence yah know.

Because if she's a hottie, it'd be a waste, right?

..and if she's ugly, it'd be like a mercy killing.

right?

not that it matters.. either way, it's dead tuna on toast.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #40 on:** January 21, 2003, 11:36:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
Which one is having bigger cojones:
A) That woman heading to middle-east trying to stop the war with the way she feels is good or..
B) Grünhertz and some others squeaking about it and telling on the bulletinboard that she should die while doing that.

Some of you should wear a dress.

I vote C.

I'm correct and she is wrong.

whgates3 · « **Reply #41 on:** January 22, 2003, 12:20:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by BEVO
the government can't tell us all of the details, but I'm pretty sure they have a pretty good reason for starting a war with Iraq. and no, it's not for the oil.

...so you dont know any of the reasoning, but you can unquestionably vouch for it's merit & righteousness?

Quote

Originally posted by BEVO

reminds me of the story of a hippy tree hugger who chain himself to a tree to keep them from cutting down a forest.... the animals need a home, he said....... that night while still chained to the tree, a bear came along and ate him.

LOL - is that true? post a link (bet its from TheOnion )

Quote

Originally posted by Hangtime
...either way, it's dead tuna on toast.

as long as its dolphin free...

SaburoS · « **Reply #42 on:** January 22, 2003, 01:24:14 AM »

LOL!

I'm with Thrawn and Co on this one.