« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Name This...(418)  (Read 517 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(418)
« on: January 24, 2003, 01:57:24 AM »
???
Logged

Offline dankes

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Name This...(418)
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2003, 02:53:51 AM »
SU-152

This is not ISU-122 or ISU-152 IMO - they had AA 12.7 MG and other hull configuration
« Last Edit: January 24, 2003, 02:56:48 AM by dankes »
Logged

Offline devious

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
      • http://www.jg301-wildesau.de
Name This...(418)
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2003, 04:01:18 AM »
Think it's a SU-152, too
Logged

Offline dankes

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Name This...(418)
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2003, 04:29:17 AM »
Su-152




ISu-122



ISu-152


Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Name This...(418)
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2003, 06:10:49 AM »
Looks more like a ISI-122 by looking at the muzzle of the gun barrel. The ISU-152 has a ring just back from the end while the barrel in the photo does not. The superstructure is too high to be a SU vehicle.

ISU-122

http://www.battlefield.ru/tanks/isu122_152/isu122_6.jpg
Logged

Offline dankes

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Name This...(418)
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2003, 06:24:06 AM »
No look at all 3 SPGs profile.

SU-152 is much lower than ISU -1*2.
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Name This...(418)
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2003, 08:05:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dankes
No look at all 3 SPGs profile.

SU-152 is much lower than ISU -1*2.


Yes good idea, and re-read my post carefully, as in  

"The superstructure is too high to be a SU vehicle." ;)

Do a measurement on the photo.

superstructure height from bottom of superstructure  = height to bottom of superstructure from the ground

So thank you for  confirming is an ISU vehicle.;)

Further proof it is an ISU vehicle, the forward return roller is closer to the second bogey wheel on the IS vehicle which but on the ISU it is positioned between the 1st and 2cd bogeys(as per your profiles)

though shows a 152 not the 122,

http://www.onwar.com/tanks/ussr/plans/isu152_44.gif

which shows no PK periscope, different roof vents as does the photo, as does your profiles

Take a good look at the gun barrel.


photo = ISU-122
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Name This...(418)
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2003, 08:14:32 AM »
This is an ISU-122, no doubt...
Logged

Offline dankes

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Name This...(418)
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2003, 08:22:37 AM »
Yeah chassis confirms that this is ISU, but not quite sure about 122. Look at barrel length and length/diameter proportions.

Some 152s might have no muzzle brake.
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Name This...(418)
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2003, 08:42:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dankes
Yeah chassis confirms that this is ISU, but not quite sure about 122. Look at barrel length and length/diameter proportions.

Some 152s might have no muzzle brake.


dankes, if the brake is removed then could be a 152,;) but then the barrel l is too short  than in the photo.

barrel looks a large dia.

http://pstmodel.com/images/ISU-122.jpg



compare

http://www.wargaming.net/tanks/IMAGES/ISU-122-side.gif
http://www.wargaming.net/tanks/IMAGES/ISU-152-side.gif
Logged

Offline dankes

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Name This...(418)
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2003, 09:02:12 AM »
122, that is

my pictures were wrong
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Name This...(418)
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2003, 09:57:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dankes
122, that is

my pictures were wrong


danke, sorry if I sounded harsh, just don't like being long winded.;)
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Name This...(418)
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2003, 10:45:09 AM »
I think its a 122.
But very definatly a great picture of a vehicle that would be great in AH.
single round hanger kills.
Logged

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
Name This...(418)
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2003, 12:17:52 PM »
SU 100 maybe
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Name This...(418)
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2003, 01:01:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by keyapaha
SU 100 maybe


http://www.wwiivehicles.com/images/ussr/su_100_captured_01.jpg

The SU100 is based on the T-34 chassis;) while the IS and ISU are based on the KV and IS heavy tank chassis's.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »