Every now and then it's nice too see something different. The CT staff knows this and occasionally throws out a unique setup. While I'm not a "CT regular", I DO fly in it when I like the setup

Next time the CT staffers want to try something "different, here's one thing that might be fun as a diversion for a week:
"Army vs Navy grudge match".
The USAAF and USN planesets look like they're pretty evenly-matched, and both have a lot of fans.
USN fighters=FM2, F6F, F4U-1, F4U-1D
USAAF fighters= P-38L, P-47's, P-51's
Both sides would need the use pf the C-47 and GV's
That's a pretty even matchup. It could make for a fun "for bragging rights" match.
But what about bombers? Well, the A-20G and B-26 both carry 4K worth of bombs, and the USN DID possess a few A-20's under the designation "BD-2" (A-20C's used as target tugs, but hey they had 'em), so it's not completely wrong to permit the USN use of the A-20. The B-26 would be alotted to the USAAF forces. While the B-26 is capable of level-bombing and is better defended, the speed and maneuverability of the A-20 cannot be dismissed. If the B-26 proved to be too tough for the USN to shoot down, the F4U-1C could be made available as a counter, perhaps as a perk, or perhaps as land-based only, or something.
The USN as a natural advantage in the fact that their planes can, for the most part, take off of carriers (A-20's and C-47's would have to be land-based). If this was
too much of an advantage, there is the fact that razorback P-47D's did at times fly off of carriers into combat, so making them available from CV's wouldn't be too oddball. Or the terrain could simply limit the carriers, or planes available on carriiers. One good idea could be to treat carriers like they were escort CV's--give them FM2's and TBM's only, if having all the USN planes operational from CV's proved to be too troublesome.
I think a USN vs USAAF grudge match would be fun

J_A_B