Author Topic: Will GW submit to an election next year?  (Read 1080 times)

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« on: January 26, 2003, 10:23:15 PM »
Next year is supposed to be a presidential election year. Think the President will call one? Or find a reason not too?

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
He will try to find a reason not to.
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2003, 10:26:25 PM »
Because unless he figures out how to do his job right, he doesn't have a chance at a second term.

"It's the economy stupid."

He needs to take that quote to heart.

Offline Nifty

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4400
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2003, 10:38:16 PM »
LOL.  Like he has a choice?  Lincoln was re-elected in 1864.  FDR had to run in 1944.  Truman elected not to run in '52 because he knew he'd lose.  Same with LBJ I think.  Nixon ran and was re-elected in '72.

There is no precedent for not holding an election during war time in the USA.  You guys have been watching too much Star Wars II or something.

President Bush gets granted emergency powers, and holds onto office for 10 years of war with Iraq, and establishes the New Order and declares himself Emperor...   yeah...  I can see that happening.  :p
proud member of the 332nd Flying Mongrels, noses in the wind since 1997.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2003, 10:48:29 PM »
in the USA the president does not "CALL" a election , but being from canada you would not understand, you people only have a "prime minister" who is a subject of the crown.

Offline WpnX

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 679
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2003, 11:05:32 PM »
Weazel,
Most of America knows that he is doing his job right and his approval rating in the national polls show that. If an election was held today he would surely receive my vote. Wars cost money and most Americans understand that fact. You need to look at the big picture. Fix worldwide security first, the economy will come back.
Elvis
The Flying Circus

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2003, 11:15:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WpnX
Weazel,
Most of America knows that he is doing his job right and his approval rating in the national polls show that. If an election was held today he would surely receive my vote. Wars cost money and most Americans understand that fact. You need to look at the big picture. Fix worldwide security first, the economy will come back.


This is far too complex for him to understand.

Offline Erlkonig

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 564
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2003, 11:25:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WpnX
Weazel,
Most of America knows that he is doing his job right and his approval rating in the national polls show that.


You mean, in the way that his approval rating is currently sinking to pre-9/11 numbers, and his disapproval rating the highest it's ever been during his entire presidency?

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2003, 02:45:45 AM »
I think GWB is doing a fine job and I think the repuglicans suck worse than the dumbocrats, but if he tried to stop an election next year I would take up arms.  Pretty sure hundreds of millions of other 'murrcuns agree.

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2003, 03:24:09 AM »
Most retarded thread of the week.  Congrats Pongo!  :)


SOB
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2003, 03:26:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WpnX
Fix worldwide security first, the economy will come back.


That's a pretty good point.

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4294
      • Wait For It
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2003, 03:43:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup
That's a pretty good point.


Gee thanks guys.... you just tripped the "War for Oil" kneejerk answer alarm.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2003, 03:46:50 AM »
I don't see a problem with waging war to ensure future prosperity.  I thought that was the whole idea of war, at least the offensive type of war.

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2003, 03:51:20 AM »
Well, Funked, that sounds very much like the definition of colonial war to me.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2003, 03:56:38 AM »
I mean global prosperity more than local prosperity.
Of course you are a descendent of those who elected Chamberlain...

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Will GW submit to an election next year?
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2003, 04:04:25 AM »
Quote
I mean global prosperity more than local prosperity.


An argument over semantics. A war over resources is still a war over resources, no matter how it's dressed up or who prosecutes it.

Quote
Of course you are a descendent of those who elected Chamberlain...


Not necessarily. I've no idea how my great grandparents voted, if they voted at all. I doubt it would be conservative given where I'm from and where they worked. I'm pretty sure my grandparents weren't 18 when Chamberlain was voted in.

My other relatives were German, so perhaps they voted for Hitler in 1933. That must make me a nazi by your flawless logic.

Sieg Heil!
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.