Author Topic: Will GW submit to an election next year? (Read 1083 times)

Wotan · « **Reply #15 on:** January 27, 2003, 05:56:44 AM »

there were plenty of German Communists too

Dowding · « **Reply #16 on:** January 27, 2003, 06:05:59 AM »

Is a similar way to how there are friends of the BNP in the States at the moment.

Posted by Wotan some time ago:

Quote

I actually was present at an American Friends
of the BNP meeting outside Wash DC where Mr.
Irving participated in a teleconference prior to that "trial".

The BNP is a transparently fascist organisation that until very recently advocated the forced repatriation of all ethnic minorities to their country of origin.

Just watch where you throw those labels of political extremism - you never know where they might land.

Leslie · « **Reply #17 on:** January 27, 2003, 06:19:16 AM »

I'm with SOB on this one. Y'all musta run outta things to whine about playing Aces High. So now you gotta complain about the President.

Les

Dowding · « **Reply #18 on:** January 27, 2003, 04:25:11 PM »

in the hope Wotan replies.

I'm interested in how much of a 'Friend of the BNP' he is.

Wotan · « **Reply #19 on:** January 27, 2003, 05:42:54 PM »

Reply to what? you have said more about immigrants in your country thats more inline with the BNP then I have.

Something about them ruining your community etc........

Also punt the whole thread up

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16134

Read the first line in that post......

Read the thread, my posts are clearly just pulling your chain through out. Count the number of smiley faces.........

Well I replied...........Dunno what for ................... but here ya go.........

lord dolf vader · « **Reply #20 on:** January 27, 2003, 08:49:06 PM »

I would take up arms.

as would be your duty. tree of libery watering time.

rc51 · « **Reply #21 on:** January 27, 2003, 08:54:11 PM »

I claim no political party!
But I voted for Bush.
I am sobor now and rethinking my choice LOL.
Look I think Bush should go after al quedda and get the boogers who hit the world trade tower and pentegon.
Iraq and soodumb insain are but a small wart on the butt of the waorld right now.
You should worry N Korea.
There are much stronger than Iraq.
And much more of a threat!
Just my 2 cents worth

StSanta · « **Reply #22 on:** January 28, 2003, 08:08:37 AM »

Fix worldwide security first, the economy will come back.

Overly simplistic. Implies that the economic downturn is a direct result of the terrorist attacks. The economy was on a sharp decline before 9/11.

Historically, there have been many times when the economy has been bad - and it hasn't been caused by terrorism. Terrorism aggravated the situation, but it did not cause it. And the war on terrorism will be an indefinite one, so with that mindset we have many yers of squalor ahead of us.

Polls indicate that Americans are worried more about domestic issues. Voters memories are very short and tied to their purse. Bush stands strong as a 'war commander' but less so as a 'civilian administrator'. The American public will decide which is more important soon enough. Of course he could pull a Sharon (and I think he will) near the end of elections, get the focus back on terrorism and win the day. I expect to see some kind of military intervention in the weeks before the election.

Turdboy · « **Reply #23 on:** January 28, 2003, 10:34:39 AM »

Why would he need to start a war to win the election?

The Democrats don't have anyone who can beat him so why worry?

Pongo · « **Reply #24 on:** January 28, 2003, 10:35:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
in the USA the president does not "CALL" a election , but being from canada you would not understand, you people only have a "prime minister" who is a subject of the crown.

You are correct. I thought he had some flexibility like they have here...

SOB.
Really? I think it raised some interesting discussion. Its funny that you cant even concieve of it happening.

Thrawn · « **Reply #25 on:** January 28, 2003, 10:50:17 AM »

There's an economic down turn? Someone should tell Canada, we have the fastest growing economy of the G8.

Dead Man Flying · « **Reply #26 on:** January 28, 2003, 10:52:46 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
Really? I think it raised some interesting discussion. Its funny that you cant even concieve of it happening.

Americans can't conceive of it happening because it won't happen. Not in this lifetime and certainly not with this president. Popular support for Bush would disappear instantly with such a move, and he'd undermine the constitutional basis for his authority. He'd be arrested, impeached, convicted, and thrown in jail in a heart beat.

-- Todd/Leviathn

lord dolf vader · « **Reply #27 on:** January 28, 2003, 10:55:14 AM »

exactly

AKIron · « **Reply #28 on:** January 28, 2003, 11:06:45 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lord dolf vader
I would take up arms.

as would be your duty. tree of libery watering time.

Better get 'em now. By the time you need 'em they may not be available.

Pongo · « **Reply #29 on:** January 28, 2003, 11:20:08 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dead Man Flying
Americans can't conceive of it happening because it won't happen. Not in this lifetime and certainly not with this president. Popular support for Bush would disappear instantly with such a move, and he'd undermine the constitutional basis for his authority. He'd be arrested, impeached, convicted, and thrown in jail in a heart beat.

-- Todd/Leviathn

Was your constitution written to handle the concept of your country waging an unpopular war of aggression on the other side of the world to either secure the supply of oil for a generation or to restrict that country from having weapons that you yourselves have? How relevent is your constitution to the situtation that is emerging?