Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
I still can't get past the part about proving that something doesn't exist.
There's a flaw in the logic there.
I think it's more like we know you had/have it. Prove you destroyed it.
We had a chance to eliminate Saddam 12 years ago. We didn't because he surrendered and agreed to our terms. What's changed in the last 12 years that makes you think we have motives now other than what we had then?
