I appologise for insensitive remarks concerning some US soldiers, especially considering a risk they may soon face for no good reason - a still indeterminate but possibly much greater risk than what our armchair war proponents claim. I mean, if iraqi military is so weak and unwilling to fight for Hussein and all the population hates him and wants democracy, they surely would have got rid of him without our help - what with full-auto rifles legally sold and widely available there to everyone.
My show of respect towards US combat troops - however bad worded and misplaced - was never ment to imply any disrespect towards rear-echelon personnel. I may admire combat troops more that any other people but rear-echelon guys are still closer to action and more vital to the success of the war than a bunch of loud-mouth civilians willing to liberate everyone and anyone and dish out preemptive strikes while sitting on their fat asses.
Risks and responcibilities are different, but once a soldier, one submits him/herself to the authority of the commander and can be sent anywhere or ordered to die if needed.
And if a little boasting is involved to get a date or impending risk is used to justify a dumb argument (like that a $6 million-a-year athlete is less deserving of an extra million bucks than a billionaire team owner) - what the heck...
I scored a few chicks myself on "brave trooper going to face danger" sympathy, even before getting shot at on 8 roubles per month and three meals of cabbage a day. I am certainly not going to hold that against anyone else. Let the boys pose all they want and come home safe.
I would certainly feel ashamed if my son (or daughter, if any) applies to the non-combat branch of service if a combat-related berth is available (health permitting), but it would be the shame of my failure as a parent, not low opinion of those who fill the vital support roles.
miko