Author Topic: What we need in the next version of AH  (Read 487 times)

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
What we need in the next version of AH
« on: February 12, 2003, 12:51:17 AM »
We need one of these on the "Unfriendly Seas" of AH.
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2003, 12:54:17 AM »
An E-Boat would indeed be a nice addition.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2003, 01:04:45 AM »
Would be cool. Plenty of firepower, 40 Knot top speed and even racks on the back for mines or depth charges should we get submarines in the future.
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2003, 01:32:10 AM »
imune to 50 cal fire..

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2003, 02:06:29 AM »
dont count on it i watched a guy kill/sink a cruiser a few times just by strafing it in a p38........

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2003, 08:01:02 AM »
Ya it would rock hard, be real nice to have a Boat like tis that could take 50cal fire, their are some vershions whith even more AA guns on them than shown in that pick, I ran a post on it a lont time ago, I will see if I cant dig it up.

Offline maxtor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 369
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2003, 09:38:24 AM »
bet those torpedos/depthcharges on deck would react unfavorably to 50 cal?

Offline Sakai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2003, 10:14:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by maxtor
bet those torpedos/depthcharges on deck would react unfavorably to 50 cal?


As would the staff sitting topside.  Didn't some Tuskeegee Airmen blow one up strafing it in P-40s?  That would kind of stop the "immune to MG bullets" claims wouldn't it?

Sakai
"The P-40B does all the work for you . . ."

Offline NOD2000

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 904
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2003, 12:34:06 PM »
The tuskeegee airmen flew P-51's only if I remeber correctly.

They were the "men with the red tails" as the 303rd bomber group called them

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2003, 01:06:34 PM »
Even destroyers weren't immune to .50 cal fire in WW2.  Doubt some little kraut skiff is gonna do any better.  :)

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2003, 01:27:12 PM »
mmf i think that there are more than enough non playercontrolled boats already

lets get some playercontrolled boats

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8804
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2003, 01:27:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NOD2000
The tuskeegee airmen flew P-51's only if I remeber correctly.

They were the "men with the red tails" as the 303rd bomber group called them


The Red-tailed Angels flew the P-40, P-47 and P-51. They had to settle for hand-me-down P-51Cs as white groups transitioned to the P-51D. That was SOP, with the Tuskeegee pilots being last in line for new equipment.

Oh yeah, the P-51C was a Dallas built P-51B, just as the P-51K was a Dallas built P-51D (with a different Aeroproducts prop).

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2003, 02:18:42 PM »
It would be a player controled boat.

   The German E boats(s boats) had armore on them in critical areas, unlike their American counter parts. So in this regard they would be able to asorbe much more damage.

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2003, 03:38:00 PM »
maybe you could "skip" 50 cals across the water to penetrate the unarmored area below the water line. Hell it worked and tanks right?

Offline Ridge

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
      • http://www.combatfs.com/forums/index.php
What we need in the next version of AH
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2003, 03:52:30 PM »
When bullets impact water they slow down dramatically. By the time it reached the ship, it would have the same effect as a salmon running into the ship...