Author Topic: small suggestions on graphics..  (Read 906 times)

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
small suggestions on graphics..
« on: February 13, 2003, 04:45:50 PM »
Personally, I would like to rquest that some of the moving parts on the plane models be visible.. one such instance is the leading edge slats on the 109s and Las.. it's a small thing, but it really has some impact on immersion.. It almost feels like EAW, where the planes aren't modelled with any visual aileron/elevator movement.. :o

 ...

 Also, it would be really cool to see better looking tracers.. the smoling trail in IL-2 seems a bit too dark and too thick, but the same trails seem too thin and clean in AH... it feels almost like a grey laser beam.. :D I wonder if there is any chance of seeing them used with the cool particle system..

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2003, 06:03:14 PM »
I'd like to see the tailhooks drop and retract on carrier birds. :D

Offline Ridge

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
      • http://www.combatfs.com/forums/index.php
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2003, 01:00:05 PM »
I'd second the tail hooks. Also, a fun feature would be a key command to fold wings on the appropriate birds. Would be exciting to get a wing of F4Us sitting on the CV waiting for an attack raid, or something...

Note: Dont mind the fact all the Corsairs are sunk into the deck. It is a bug in the game featured...
« Last Edit: February 14, 2003, 01:06:00 PM by Ridge »

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2003, 12:09:20 AM »
combat flight simulator 2?

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2003, 01:38:38 AM »
I would like to see Vapor trails on its wingtips from b-17 or other bombers when they reach 275 to 300 mph

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2003, 01:41:21 AM »
and i would like to see a new menu system to replace the clipboard which is very hard to see.

Offline Ridge

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
      • http://www.combatfs.com/forums/index.php
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2003, 11:00:46 AM »
Ya, CFS2...you play it?

If so, got some great files for ya....apparently the ship dps were several times the dimensions of the ships, and waaaayyy too weak. I have modified .dps...People have gotten the bomb bay doors open, too!

S!

Ridge

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2003, 11:25:55 AM »
nah, i've got cf3, which IMO sucks with all the gfx bugs

Offline poopster

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2003, 11:42:33 AM »
The main thing that is going to be possible with the new system is plane skins like this..


Planes skins and a sun with the intensity of IL-2. Our terrain kicks butt now, who knows what they'll be able to do with the new engine..

Sun flare would be a GREAT addition. Vapor trails elsewhere have an FPS problem. Be a great thing to have "if" it could be done without hitting framerates.

Gonna be fun. And no doubt pretty.

Offline ChuBBs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 350
      • http://www.81x.com/Chubbs/AcesHigh
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2003, 03:23:30 PM »
but like il2 i'd like to see the props bend when u do belly landings and such.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2003, 03:28:04 PM »
Whoo ... sprinting pile-it! (hehe)

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2003, 07:06:10 AM »
Hmmm, nice pic Arlo.   Were there any F4U-1s with carrier landing hooks?   I thought the Marines removed them since the type was just operating from land  bases.

Another small graphics change I'd like to see is the smoke column generated by burning field targets.   Its too short and fat.  Every column of smoke I've seen is taller and skinnier, and when you approach a destroyed base, the smoke palls should clearly be visible as the base comes into view.  Right now you get to see the whole base but only when you get closer does the generated smoke become visible.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2003, 08:37:19 AM »
Oh, hell yeah. :D

VF-17 fully qualified in them in 1943.

http://www.arrakis-ttm.com/vf-17/jrhistory.html

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2003, 02:42:34 PM »
Chubbs pic reminds me..

 better looking flames would be cool :)

 also.. maybe better hit sprites!

Offline hazed-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2467
      • http://combatarena.users.btopenworld.com
small suggestions on graphics..
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2003, 12:50:31 AM »
Id like to add:

Dust kicked up from movement on ground.
Oil hits actually spray out over the screen.
Bullet holes in canopy and instruments(with resulting loss of those instruments).
a 3d modeled pilot?? :)