Author Topic: MT for you  (Read 213 times)

Offline JBA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1797
MT for you
« on: February 14, 2003, 10:45:39 AM »
QUID PRO QUO - Lat. 'what for what' or 'something for something.' The concept of getting something of value in return for giving something of value. For a contract to be binding, it usually must involve the exchange of something of value.
"They effect the march of freedom with their flash drives.....and I use mine for porn. Viva La Revolution!". .ZetaNine  03/06/08
"I'm just a victim of my own liberalhoodedness"  Midnight Target

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Re: MT for you
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2003, 10:48:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by JBA
For a contract to be binding, it usually must involve the exchange of something of value.


Formally known as "consideration"...no consideration, no valid contract.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
MT for you
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2003, 11:28:12 AM »
Thanks, I knew that. Mainly from extensive training in avoiding Sexual Harrasment in the workplace.


Now explain how moving trade decisions to the Commerce Dept. is Quid Pro Quo?


Offline JBA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1797
MT for you
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2003, 01:17:30 PM »
Its an abuse of power (insert *crime) and demonstrates that Clinton was willing to place America in harms way for his own legacy.
 
How?  Quid Pro quo: He received the contributions from China and the tech company and in return made it possible for them to receive the technology,  by circumventing the congress to do it.
"They effect the march of freedom with their flash drives.....and I use mine for porn. Viva La Revolution!". .ZetaNine  03/06/08
"I'm just a victim of my own liberalhoodedness"  Midnight Target

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
MT for you
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2003, 03:22:18 PM »
He didn't circumvent the congress. State Department doesn't work for the congress. Both State and Commerce are part of the Administrative branch, and Clinton had control of both.

Putting Commerce in charge of Trade is just good policy. Hardly Q-P-Q.