Author Topic: Bush on anti-war protesters  (Read 1293 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2003, 04:11:03 PM »
ACLU Lawyer?

Oh my Cod!  A person who wants to uphold individual rights you mean!!!??

BURN HIM!

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2003, 04:27:28 PM »
MT,

I think you meant to say "The ACLU wants to selectively uphold individual rights."

Just though I would help you out.   Us old farts gotta stick together.

No need to thank me...it was my pleasure.

Regards, Shuckins

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2003, 06:50:25 PM »
Hehe.  ;)

Offline capt. apathy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4240
      • http://www.moviewavs.com/cgi-bin/moviewavs.cgi?Bandits=danger.wav
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2003, 06:52:27 PM »
if he cared what most Americans wanted he wouldn't be the pres.

Offline batdog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com/
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2003, 07:19:59 PM »
By the Wez

Bush's 'sacrifice' can't be matched

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"As we head for war with Iraq, Americans should reflect and be grateful for combat sacrifices
made by our veterans, such as Sen. Inouye (lost an arm), Sen. John McCain (six years as a POW),
Bob Kerrey (lost a leg) and Max Cleland (lost both legs and an arm).

However, we veterans are most impressed by the sacrifices of Vietnam-era veteran George W. Bush,
who lost his memory for nearly a whole year concerning where he was and what he was doing from
mid-1972 to mid-1973 when he was supposed to be serving in the Texas Air National Guard.

Loss of limbs pale in comparison with our president's unique personal sacrifice.
We are fortunate to have such a selfless and patriotic man leading us to war."

Chris Riser,
a veteran of Desert Storm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Uhhh..ookkkaaaayy. We had 2 pres in ww2. I dont recall ethier being Vets. Being a vet isnt a something required to lead a nation in times of strife. It requires balls... something that GB has.
Of course, I only see what he posts here and what he does in the MA.  I know virtually nothing about the man.  I think its important for people to realize that we don't really know squat about each other.... definately not enough to use words like "hate".

AKDejaVu

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2003, 07:23:00 PM »
I hate the lil donutwood.

But, he's the damn President. When he slips on that CIC hat and sez "Lets Go!", I ain't gonna screw the troops by bad mouthing the miserable lil bag of toejam.

I've already informed him of how charmed I am regarding the tax cuts, and in a sepaerate note, give him an 'attaboy' for taking a firm stand on terror and saddam.

I keep him informed, he keeps me humored... and next election, I'm voting for ABB (anybody but bush).
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2003, 07:33:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
bahaha I knew you were a Trekkie!!

Anyone else get the mental image of those goofs in X-files when Weazel posts? My bet is he looks like the one with unwashed long hair and glasses.


Weasle is the cigarette man.

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #22 on: February 18, 2003, 07:34:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
Sorry but your post is uncomplete (I corrected it a bit) :

WTG GeeDubya!

The guy just gets better and better,  Fu*k the germans,  Fu*k the french!  Fu*k the UN Fu*k the american!  .  Fu*k weazel!  My kinda Prez :)


You fight like a child! Stop mocking us!

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2003, 07:38:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
Any other Britishers see the irony of this statement?

Blair is a pathological focus group policy maker - it's the cornerstone of his Premiership.


I respect Blair.

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
FDR or Truman weren't deserters either Batdog
« Reply #24 on: February 18, 2003, 08:20:29 PM »
The Post-Standard (an affiliate of Syracuse.com) is reporting that Bush tried to halt the NYC anti-war rally.

Last week, the NY mayor's office told organizers of the rally they could not march on the UN, citing "security concerns."

Then, a three-judge federal panel upheld the mayor.

But the Bush administration had filed a brief with the judge panel, urging it to support Bloomberg's decision to halt the march.

That last line bears repeating; The Bush administration filed a brief in an attempt to stop the rally.

This was a blatant maneuver to discourage the growing protests against the White House and the rush towards war.  

It was a denial of 1st Amendment rights. This latest effort marks yet another assault on the Bill of Rights by this administration.

The 100,000 to 1,000,000 (numbers depend on who you talk to) people who rallied in NYC were not deterred, but this does not change the fact that Bush wanted to shut them down.

The question that begs to be asked is this; If "We The People" can't march, should our soldiers be allowed to?


Heißen Sie willkommen nach Amerika!
« Last Edit: February 18, 2003, 08:27:15 PM by weazel »

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #25 on: February 18, 2003, 08:28:08 PM »
Two scenarios.

1.)  Bush is trampelling on the rights of American citizens because he has secret plans to invade the rest of the world and become Emperor and kill everyone and nuke the whales and burn churches and make money and avenge his father and goose step and increase the deficet and murder babies.

OR:

2.)  He was concerned that a terrorist group might think that a protest would provide wonderful cover for an attack.

You decide.

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Yup thats probably it <roll eyes>
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2003, 08:55:08 PM »
Inaugural Demonstrations

Protesters Prominent on Parade Route; Some Arrests Made

Quote
"Despite rainy winter weather in the nation's capital, protesters also congregated prior to the parade at the U.S. Supreme Court on Capitol Hill, chanting, "No Justice, No Peace!"

Earlier, just at the moment Bush was taking his oath of office, police were clashing with protesters at an intersection just a few blocks from the parade route in downtown Washington.

With a helicopter hovering overhead, the Secret Service and busloads of police, some in riot gear, blocked off the intersection, though the vast majority of the protesters were congregating peacefully.

Law enforcement officials said the protesters were being surrounded and moved because they did not have a permit to gather on the street. The demonstrators began to disperse at around the time Bush finished delivering his inaugural address. So far police have made a total of nine arrests for disorderly conduct."


You probably think he should call out the National Guard in their riot gear?

The marchers faced the biggest show of police force ever for a presidential inauguration. For the first time in history an inauguration was declared a “national special security event,” which placed the Secret Service in overall charge of security.

At least 10,000 uniformed and plainclothes officers of 16 federal, state and local police agencies were present. The parade route was lined with steel barricades and uniformed police stood five to eight feet apart. To get close to the parade route, people had to pass through one of ten checkpoints where bags were searched while helicopters flew overhead and sharp-shooters watched from rooftops.

Police justified the buildup by claiming that the protesters would be violent. However, the only violence came from the police themselves. When a contingent of demonstrators who had left Dupont Circle heading for Freedom Plaza, where they had a permit to protest, they were blocked by a line of police in riot gear standing shoulder to shoulder. As the demonstrators approached and chanted “let us through” the police began swinging their clubs and arrested 15 people.

At another point during the parade the Secret Service had all the checkpoints closed but two. This meant that thousands of both protesters and supporters of Bush had to walk as many as ten additional blocks to enter the parade area. At the first of these two checkpoints the line stretched more than three blocks as people waited to enter.

These are the facts, chimpy doesn't believe in the right to assemble or protest....and it started on Inauguration  day.

The boy ain't right.



Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
He was concerned that a terrorist group might think that a protest would provide wonderful cover for an attack.

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #27 on: February 18, 2003, 09:13:34 PM »
Imagine if your local law enforcement functioned like the UN .

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #28 on: February 18, 2003, 09:33:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Two scenarios.

1.)  Bush is trampelling on the rights of American citizens because he has secret plans to invade the rest of the world and become Emperor and kill everyone and nuke the whales and burn churches and make money and avenge his father and goose step and increase the deficet and murder babies.

OR:

2.)  He was concerned that a terrorist group might think that a protest would provide wonderful cover for an attack.

You decide.


Attacking & threatening middle eastern countries just creates more unhappy people ready to become terrorists...

Heck, their primary target is US, Europe is the secondary.
Tells something.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Re: Bush on anti-war protesters
« Reply #29 on: February 18, 2003, 09:47:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
Mr President
(in case he is browsing these boards...you never know)

You americans are damn lucky to have a great President at these times.


Some of don't feel so lucky. Hell, most of us didn't even vote for him.
sand