Suggestion on Views..

[acepilot2]

I dont think there was auto-climb or auto-level, so isnt that more realsitic?




Anyways, I think you should be able to see behind you.  If I can see behind me in a car with a seatbelt on really tight, I think you can in a plane (but I would not know). However, I guess it is realistic that when pulling a high-g turn or something that then it limits your view, because in high g's you cant really move your body.

[Kweassa]

Hazed... with all due respect,

 that's sort of like the same logic when some people in IL-2 forums argue that "no-cockpit mode is a compromise for the visual limits on a plane, and is more realistic than the restricted cockpit view".

 ....
 
 I'm not saying that we should dumb down 6-view to IL-2 levels.

 I clearly and surely agree that IL-2's lack of 6-view where your 5, 6, 7 O'c is totally obscured, is an "overkill" to please the nutty 'realism fanatics' who confuse 'hard' with 'real'.

 However, as much, as I have stated earlier, getting a panoramic "wide-vision" 6-view in one touch, is nonsense. No excuse for such thing. What I'm saying is divide our current 6-view in half, and make people get only 1 at a time - the left galf and the right half.

[Batz]

if you get trackir in il2 you get the same dead 6 view as in ah.

[honda346]

trackIR is the only way to go... I'm serious, once you've used it with the enhanced mode you can hardly go back... I get into Aces and continually move my head around like I do in IL2-FB until I realize I have to go back to the old fashioned multiple hat/button combinations to look where I want to.  For any flight sim enthusiast you simply HAVE to get one.  Not saying the other views shouldn't be there for others that aren't into it as much but I for one will be making purchase decisions based on who supports the trackIR in the future.