Will Bush sacrify his best Ally?

[blitz]

When Bush goes to war with Iraq without being aloud by a new UN resolution Tony is politicaly dead.

Will Bush risk that? I bet


Regards Blitz



When will Blix take care of the WMDs of the the big four?

[Ripsnort]

Blitz, some answers for you:

Leftists: The United States is taking unilateral action against Iraq!
Answer: So far, it's a 90-member worldwide "unilateral" coalition.

Leftists: We are in a rush to war.
Answer: An 11-year rush?

Leftists: Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without invading Iraq.
Answer: Years of inspections have done wonders so far.

Leftists: We should let the inspectors finish their job.
Answer: We did. They didn't. We will.

Leftists: Why fight? The Iraqi military is weaker than in 1991.
Answer: But their biological weapons and chemical weapons are much more dangerous.

Leftists: There's no proof of weapons.
Answer: We know they have 'em, we know they hide 'em, and we have tape recordings and photographs. What more is needed? An Iraqi rocket in Martin Sheen's shorts?

Leftists: If we invade, Saddam Hussein might use those weapons of mass destruction against us.
Answer: I thought you said Iraq didn't have them!

Leftists: But terrorists might attack if we invade Iraq.
Answer: Oh…so if we don't attack Iraq, terrorists will never strike again?

Leftists: We shouldn't go to war without a UN resolution.
Answer: ANOTHER resolution? What about the last 16 resolutions? Shall we use them as wallpaper? Or shall we use the same resolutions Bill Clinton used in Bosnia?

Leftists: We don't have a real declaration for war.
Answer: It's called "Joint Congressional Resolution #114."

Leftists: If North Korea has nuclear weapons, why aren't we invading them first?
Answer: First things first.

North Korea has not invaded two neighboring countries within the past two decades. Iraq did.

North Korea does not pay $20,000 in blood money to the families of terrorist murderers. Iraq does.

North Korea has not used nerve gas and mustard gas against invaded countries as well as its own citizens. It's merely starving them. Iraq HAS used poison gases.

Iraq, not North Korea, welcomes and houses Arab terrorists who despise Israel and its only ally in the world, America. There are more reasons, but these will do.

Leftists: European leaders are against the war.
Answer: The Reichstag wasn't attacked. The Grande Palace wasn't attacked. The Kremlin wasn't attacked. And the Jerry Lewis Lifetime Achievement Museum wasn't attacked. America was attacked. And besides, except for the tantrums of France, Belgium and Germany, only three European nations aren't willing to defend freedom. The entire rest of Europe is with America.

Leftists: The French don't support the war.
Answer: Oh…did they surrender already?

Leftists: Germany objects to this war.
Answer: Germany objected to Reagan's "attitude" towards the Soviet Union. Of course, they objected to our presence in 1943 as well.

Leftists: Belgians are against the war.
Answer: I can live without Waffles and ice cream.

Leftists: Russia doesn't support the war.
Answer: They are still angry over Reagan's brilliant Cold War victory.

Leftists: Polls show Europeans are against this war.
Answer: Polls show Europeans believe their freedom was achieved by endlessly debating in marvelous dining halls, conveniently forgetting their right to be pompous blowhards was granted with American blood, not fabulous wine and brie…

Leftists: We should build a coalition with our friends.
Answer: With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Leftists: What happens if we can't build a United Nations coalition?
Answer: Who cares?

Leftists: But the UN is the world's most respected governing body.
Answer: Not as respected as the US military.

Leftists: America has always waited until enemies attacked.
Answer: Now that oceans can't hold back enemies, pre-emptive war is forever a necessity.

Leftists: War will cost billions!
Answer: So…how much is YOUR city worth?

Leftists: President Bush says he's willing to violating the 1976 executive order forbidding assassinations of foreign leaders.
Answer: As soon as the ink is dry on rescinding that idiotic order, will someone please pull the trigger? The line forms to the right…

Leftists: Many Senators don't support Bush
Answer: Are you speaking of the Senators from Bordeaux?

Leftists: Tom Daschle says George Bush has a "credibility gap"
Answer: When was the last time we came to Tom Daschle for the truth???

Leftists: These problems didn't happen under Clinton.
Answer: Actually, they happened. But Clinton ignored them. Now, Bush will clean up his mess.

Leftists: But Clinton didn't start a war.
Answer: Unless his girlfriend was testifying before congress…

Leftists: Bush 1st should have taken out Hussein in '91.
Answer: That 1991 UN resolution forbade a march on Baghdad. Remember?

Leftists: Millions of peace activists are demanding we stop the war.
Answer: Millions of Iraqi's are begging for us to start the war.

Leftists: Thousands of innocents will be killed or injured.
Answer: That's a lot less than Hussein is killing right now. (Of course, there's only one man that needs to be killed…)

Leftists: Young Americans will die in battle.
Answer: Would you prefer they die in skyscrapers?

Leftists: Protesters have genuine objections to war
Answer: Just like they did in Somalia? Bosnia?

Leftists: People are coming from all over the world to act as "human shields".
Answer: Quick, hurry, before the bombs start dropping…

Leftists: This is about American Imperialism.
Answer: So which country do we own? What nation sends us their tax dollars? If America was imperialist, we'd already own the entire world. Who could stand in our way?

Leftists: This is Blood for Oil
Answer: The only blood is the Iraqi people tortured, starved and killed while Hussein builds massive palaces to hide nuclear weapons…all financed with Iraqi oil.

Leftists: This is a racist war.
Answer: America happily endorses a multi-cultural attitude towards anyone who dares to take away our freedom.Regardless of race, color or creed, we hunt them down and kill them.
Leftists: A U.S.-led invasion of Iraq is a great recruiting tool for terrorists.
Answer: Have fun recruiting people into oppressive misery as they enjoy their first taste of freedom.

Leftists: An attack on Iraq could seriously undermine and destabilize Arab nations.
Answer: Destabilize the region? Is that possible? Do you think? The sooner we topple these tlineoppressive 14th century terrorist regimes the better.

Leftists: Are we prepared for a multi-billion dollar occupation?
Answer: Were we prepared to liberate Europe and Japan in 1945? South Korea in 1953? Grenada? El Salvador? Kuwait? The Eastern Bloc? Afghanistan? Nations always love Americans when we rescue them from tyranny. The price of freedom is never free.

Leftists: Polls show Americans are more concerned about the threat from al-Qaeda than from Iraq.
Answer: It's not a war against Al Qaeda. It's not a war against Iraq. It's a war against terrorism. Anywhere we find it. One nation at a time.

Leftists: American opinion is against the war.
Answer: No, it's not. A majority of Americans want to fight now, not later.

[Vermillion]

At this point the US has staked too much on the issue to pack up its bags and go home.  Won't happen, no matter how the French and the rest of the SC vote.

The speed of the war, the destruction, how long and how much it takes to rebuild Iraqi, AND most importantly do they find the weapons of mass destruction.  THIS will be what determines the long term political damage both in the world, and in home countries.

[gofaster]

Should've finished the job 10 years ago.

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by gofaster
Should've finished the job 10 years ago.

Talk to the Saudi's about that one for us. Thanks.

[Hortlund]

When Bush goes to war with Iraq without being aloud by a new UN resolution Tony is politicaly dead.

Will Bush risk that? I bet  


Regards Blitz


When will Blix take care of the WMDs of the the big four?

[/b]

I dont think I'll ever understand why you put a smiley in there.

The impression I get is that this is all some big game to you Blitz. Some clever debating game where the objective is to outwit someone...make them look silly...or something.

Everything you say indicates that this is just your little BB war where you are attempting to argue everything...

Saddam is a butchering thug? Sure but so is Saudi, and besides US supported him before

Saddam has WMDs? Sure but so has the US (one of the more peculiar arguments)

Saddam has used WMDs against his own people and his enemies? Yes, but at that time he was a US ally.

Saddam is in violation of UN resolutions? Sure but so is Israel.

Saddam is a threat to his neighbours? Sure but so is N Korea.

Saddam supports terrorists? Sure, but so does Saudi.

Saddam tortures his own people? Sure, but so does Saudi.

So the fact that
Saddam is a butchering thug,
that he has wmds
that he has used wmds
that he is violating UN resolutions
that he is a threat to everyone
that he supports terrorism
that he tortures his own people
...is just buried in long pointless ramblings from you and your ilk, hidden underneath pointless comparrissons (because there will always be someone worse) and then conveniently overlooked as you post yet another idiotic post spiced with a smiley or two.

Meanwhile, more Iraqis die at the hands of him, and he continues to booby trap his oil fields, dams, cities...

The blood is on the hands of the likes of you.

I have no respect for you whatsoever anymore. Congrats, now its you and straffo.

[Yeager]

Blitz.  I suggest we allow Blair an easy way out.  Just remove all UK military assests from the region.  Blair would be gone anyway.

My opinion, europe is out.  This should be a US military action.  If not then we should leave the region and let the nuclear weapons proliferate among the arabs and the jews.  Let europe deal with it.  Same with Korean pen.  Just tell everyone if we are attacked and even think your involved we destroy you.
Perhaps Germany will invade France again.

[straffo]

At least I'm proud to not be a christian torturer mister Judge.

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by straffo
At least I'm proud to not be a christian torturer mister Judge.

You couldn't be anyway...you would end up surrendering to your captive.

[straffo]

Is it an error Rip?

Or shall I use the "redneck" word ?

[Ripsnort]

Redneck and proud of it! I'll post pics of my big-ass redneck belt buckle if you wish
(And you know I'm just joking Straffo, I've stayed out of most of the France threads out of respect..)

[Animal]

ahhh, good old copy/paste.

[Saurdaukar]

Blair's political career is done anyway.  Bush wont be reelected either.  

But in 10 years, the conflict in Iraq will be seen as the right action at the right time.  Both men realize this.

[SLO]

send these to iraq........

[straffo]

I'm sorry Rip I shouldn't have posted that.

In fact as you guess my reaction come from the abomination posting after you.


(and no Animal it's not a compliment for you )