Well, the media has reportde accurately increases in spending on security. War in Iraq costs a lot. Tax cut also takes some cash.
And the economy has slown down a lot. So what I am saying isn't directly from some news site; it's just common sense; less money coming into the treasure chest, yet more money being spent. UNLESS he is cutting back on something; am not well enough versed in the US economy to say it.
But the fact is that you u were well in the black before, and are now well in the red. Not saying it is Bushs fault; it is the economy. Am just saying it seems as if he's spending MORE despite f this, instead of trying to cut costs. Since Saurdakar's confidence is on the verge of arrogance, I'd kindly ask him to help educate me; mayhap you can show me that Bush is spending less than previous admins (which he said spent way too much, and in his election speeches he pledged to spend less).
Saurdakar, I realize that the lines are drrawn up in the sand vs reps and dems, but I am neither. My questions aren't an attack on Bush but rather a real question based, as you said, on what I have read (and most of that naturally come from the media, which I find quite natural since they report on these things).
So you are in the red no doubt, and deficit spending according to the media going up. Can anyone point me to an authorative source proving what I've read wrong, or is what I read valid enough?
