« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Iraqi losses ?  (Read 2540 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2003, 08:26:04 AM »
Once again I step in and translate AronL's ramblings to the rest of us:

All is lost junior bosh devil al capone type gangster!!!  Amreeka has failed and our glorious leader Saddam Hussein is victorious yet again! Deth to Amreeka!


BTW did anyone else notice the smart bellybutton "our" characerization he used when reffering to our troops?
Logged

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2003, 08:27:48 AM »
Well Aron, you can ponder the imponderables like the future and wonder.

Or you can go to the Amnesty International website and read about how many Iraqis he kills on a continuing basis and take comfort that the lives lost in removing him will save many more from death by his order.

Maybe that can become your focus and help you through these difficult times.
Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2003, 08:33:03 AM »
Hey look AronL is on the radio.... He has a suprisingly feminine voice and goes by the name Andrea - wierd...

http://komo1000news.com/audio/kvi_aircheck_031003.mp3
Logged

Offline AronL

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2003, 08:36:10 AM »
LOL

Was that all you could think of?

Does not matter if im 3 or 50, your replies prooves that your are just a bunch kids that cant argue on a mature level.

You lost the discussion when you could not post an intelligent reply without having to resort to insults.:cool:
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2003, 08:41:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AronL


Was that all you could think of?



Seems you're picking your battles...I will repeat:

Originally posted by AronL
Saddam qualifies as a terrorist (terrorising his fellow iraqis) in my book, and most of his closest family so they are fair game in my book  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Originally posted by Ripsnort
You sure changed your tune fast:


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AronL said "There is no indication that Iraq sponsors terrorism or Al Quaida.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



That being said, this terrorist was hit by one of the missles fired at "Targets of opportunity" which was where the Iraq leadership command was rumored to be at.
Logged

Offline AronL

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #20 on: March 21, 2003, 08:50:26 AM »
No

Iraq is terrorising its own population, not the US or any other nation.

Al Quaida and Iraq has no prooven connection.
Logged

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2003, 09:02:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AronL

One life lost is one to many  Does not matter what country the person happened to be born in.

----------------------------

Saddam qualifies as a terrorist (terrorising his fellow iraqis) in my book, and most of his closest family so they are fair game in my book :cool:


What happened here?  Are you from California?  :confused:
« Last Edit: March 21, 2003, 09:05:54 AM by Saurdaukar »
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2003, 09:09:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AronL
No

Iraq is terrorising its own population, not the US or any other nation.

Al Quaida and Iraq has no prooven connection.


Again, you said  "There is no indication that Iraq sponsors terrorism or Al Quaida."

You used OR..

Either way, hope to see you on this board in a month from now when all sorts of interesting things are uncovered in Iraq.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/09/25/us.iraq.alqaeda/
Logged

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2003, 09:25:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Oedipus
 OH yeah. shhhh. Don't anyone say anthing about it or the US might actually have to attack a country that could offer some serious resistance.

Oed


Yeah, like the Falklands or something.
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2003, 09:32:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Oedipus
"But there are no terrorists in Bagdad  "

 You may be right.  But it's known that there are a quite a few in Karachi and Riyadh!   Why aren't the bombs falling there?

  OH yeah. shhhh. Don't anyone say anthing about it or the US might actually have to attack a country that could offer some serious resistance.

Oed


One of the weakest arguements, no surprise you'd use it.

NEXT!
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2003, 09:33:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AronL
You lost the discussion when you could not post an intelligent reply without having to resort to insults.:cool:



Do you actually expect serious responses to your idiotic naive childish rants.  There is a reason that 12 year olds dont run this nations foreign policy, and you are that reason...

Just shut up untill you grow up a bit and have a chance to learn a bit  about the world brefore you coment on it.

No worries though none of what I said means you arent mommies little special angel anymore...
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2003, 09:35:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
One of the weakest arguements, no surprise you'd use it.

NEXT!



Lets not forget that the USA has WMD....  Must disarm here first if we expect to do the same here.
Logged

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2003, 10:23:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
please name any other conflict, in history, where the money, technology and weapons were used to minimize CIVILIAN losses as what you see in this one .... hmm??

some will die, that is why they call it war ... fewer will die if/when they follow instructions provided by the advancing allied forces and/or stay the hell out of the way ...


You miss the main point.

Nobody would have to die if there wasn't that White house cowboy.
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2003, 10:27:29 AM »
Except all the civilians who would be killed by saddam hussein in the next few years...

Are people in my old country really that stupid?  

Hristo its like saying our 1995 offensive should not have happened because people would die - you ignore the neccesity of acting and consequences of not acting.

Plese dont give me BS about how you rememver the war and now think all war is bad. The French and Russian appeasers use this excise in referncese to WW2  and in the meantime started colonial and imperalstic wars in africa, vietnam, afghanistan and south america.
Logged

Offline Raubvogel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
Iraqi losses ?
« Reply #29 on: March 21, 2003, 10:30:43 AM »
AronL you sure spell like toejam for being a submareen enginere
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »