Author Topic: Where I'm coming from.  (Read 505 times)

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Where I'm coming from.
« on: March 21, 2003, 02:24:24 PM »
I'm for the right for anyone to burn any flag as long as it's within the law. For instance, I'm against someone burning a flag (or anything else foe that matter) near brush, trees, and or dried grass during a draught). not good to be a cause of a 100 million acre forest fire because of a political opinion.
When I see someone burn a flag, I see someone upset about a policy or two of the country's flag they're burning. I don't see them upset with everyone or everything about that particular country.
   Personally I am against flag burning. Don't confuse that with being against the right to burn the flag as I support the Rights to free speach very strongly. I won't burn my country's flag nor will I burn any other country's flag or symbol, ever. Never have, never will. That's one of the fastest nonviolent ways to get people on the fence to join the other side. It only strengthens the other side's resolve.
   Am I against this present invasion? Yes I am. Have I or will I go to the streets and protest? No. Protests via mob mentality turn into violence and chaos. Let's see, Im against the violence and chaos of war but I'm going to use violence and chaos to get my points across? Nope. I have some friends and people I know over there right now. I don't want to see them coming back in body bags. I don't want to see innocent Iraqi civillians killed/injured either.
   I am not against this war because of human rights, I am against my government going in without UN approval (official international support). To unilaterally invade another sovereign nation because of the potential of what they might do is opening a Pandoras box, we might not be able to close.
   As I see it, France, Germany, China, and Russia wanted more time for the UN inspectors to finish their inspections before deciding if it was right to invade. Had we found the smoking gun of chem, bio stockpiles, we'd have gotten the worldwide support and coalition memberships in our invasion. No smoking gun found yet. what were we afraid of by waiting another 3-6 months? That perhaps there would be no WMDs? Our allies only want proof that there are WMDs before they'd lend support. Not inuendos of their being WMDs via the proper documentation of the destruction of said WMDs.
   Keep in mind the Iraq military doesn't classify, handle, document their chemical weapons like we western nations do. We got into exposure trouble from detonating some chem munitions because we thought they were conventional. No warning signs or documentation. No seperate storage facility. They were store right next to conventional munitions in the bunkers. (I think the only difference was the color coding of the tips).
  Are you really surprised that Iraq wouldn't want to be 100% cooperative? After all since 91, it has been under a strangling econonomic blockage and embargo. A lot of their civillians have been killed do to starvation and lack of proper medical treatment.
   Is Saddam head of a brutal regime? Yup. would I be glad if his regime was replaced by a democratically elected leader by the Iraqi people? Would I like to see sovereign peoples everywhere enjoying peace, freedom, democracy, civil liberties with the rights to pursue hapiness? You bet. Our reasons are dubious for getting Saddam. We helped him, his WMD programs, supported his invasion of Iran, turned a blind eye when he massacred the Kurds (we still do that to Turkey). But because he isn't an ally of ours, we get our panties up in a bunch? We are the Doctor Frankenstein of too many regimes.
   There are and have been worse regimes that we have propped up and supported. When do we go after them and our fellow Americans that supported such regimes? If we do that we're going to be at war with the majority of the world. Either you hold the same standard to all countries or you hypocritically do not. It's ok to support a viscious, totalilitarian regime because they happen to be an ally, but not ok if they're not?
  Now that we're in this invasion, am I still against it? Yup. I do hope we reach our objectives as "cleanly" and with the least loss of life as possible (I've got too many friends and people I know over there right now). I'm sure no one likes innocent civillian casualties. those points we all have in common I'm sure.
  I've got to go to work now. You all want to flame away, go ahead. In my mind you'll be just like the flag burning idiots. Either make your case in a civilised manner or don't bother trying. we can have a civilized discussion, you know.
Regards,
SaburoS

PS. I consider myself extremely patriotic and will show my support for this country's welfare and people (yes, including every single member of this BBS no matter our disagreements) in my way. Please excuse any typos and fragmented thoughts as I just woke up.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2003, 02:26:17 PM »
Would you support this action if another UN SC resolution had been passed (in addition to 1441) authorizing it specifically?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2003, 02:28:50 PM »
I read "Me me me, I, I I...center of the universe revolves around me"

(shrugs)

Respect her (the flag) and find another inanimate object to take your "Gov't" frustrations out on. Thats called R-E-S-P-E-C-T, something we've lacked in this country for several decades now.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2003, 02:31:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
I read "Me me me, I, I I...center of the universe revolves around me"

(shrugs)

Respect her (the flag) and find another inanimate object to take your "Gov't" frustrations out on. Thats called R-E-S-P-E-C-T, something we've lacked in this country for several decades now.


Odd, I saw that too.

Offline BigGun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2003, 02:36:22 PM »
Unilaterally???

Wake up and get the facts straight. There is dozens of countries in a coalition.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2003, 02:36:45 PM »
flag burning causes global warming

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2003, 02:44:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
flag burning causes global warming


Dont forget the polution.



Go burn something else... handsomehunk protestors are pushing those who disagree with them even farther away... wonderful strategy, to be sure.

I wonder if they'll follow in France's footsteps?  You protesting college kids gonna start causing more trouble because your angry you dont get news coverage anymore?  Maybe you could bomb a few buildings for peace, get some air time.

Or maybe you should all go back to class and learn about why we are doing this.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2003, 02:45:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
flag burning causes global warming


LOL, sometimes you get me laughing pretty hard John. :)

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2003, 03:17:15 PM »
I totally agree with your exact opinion Sab.

The whole arguement is centered on Saddams possession of WMD and that he'll just dispense these weapons to terrorist groups.

Well lets move up the ladder one rung, Not!!! once have i ever heard that the peoples or govn'ts involved in giving Saddam these weapons of WMD be they chemical or biological are to be held accountable for their actions. Shouldn't these people be held accountable to explain why they gave this know dictator/terrorist these said weapons? If we hold Saddam accountable to the possibility he might give these WMD to terrorist doesn't that apply across the board to the people that supplied him or is this Animal Farm 2003.

You can go around and treat the syptoms of a disease all you want but unless you cure the cause it just a vicious circle.

But lets face facts when you look at the history of the Middle-east and the western oil companies it's all about control and exploitation. If Iraq wasn't on the world second largest oil reserve it would be just treated like Rwanda. Basing the war on the liberation of the Iraqy people hold little merit since Saddam was know to have been causing genocide, yet he was supplied with chemical and biological weapon after the fact.

America is taking the same approach to terroism as they do the in the war on drugs which is failing badly.

As for the UN, the UN doesn't work because the because the major players don't want it to unless it is in their favour, but what is the alternative?

Facts are there is no money in curing cancer or peace but you can make a toejamload of money in treating disease and selling arms.

Nuff said...

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2003, 03:27:28 PM »
Quote
I am not against this war because of human rights, I am against my government going in without UN approval (official international support).



Since when does ANY country in the world require the approval of the UN to wage war?

Quote
As I see it, France, Germany, China, and Russia wanted more time for the UN inspectors to finish their inspections before deciding if it was right to invade


The first Gulf War took place in 1991 (12 years ago) with UN resolutions requiring Saddam Hussien to disarm all Chemical/Biological/Nuclear weapons and facilities for manufacturing said weapons. How much more time do you think Saddam needed? 12 years of his delaying tactics is enough.

Also France's economic ties to Iraq have been well documented in other threads on this board. I think its safe to say it's France's economic interests they are trying to protect.

Quote
Had we found the smoking gun of chem, bio stockpiles, we'd have gotten the worldwide support and coalition memberships in our invasion. No smoking gun found yet.


Saddam has used chemical weapons in the past and was known to have stockpiles of these weapons. Not all of them have been accounted for. Iraq says they were destroyed but offers no real proof.  Until that proof is offered, we must assume they still exist.

Currently there are 45 nations in the coalition, only 3 of whom are supplying combat units.

This is more of a premptive strike against terrorism and a brutal regime. (Israel launched a preemptive strike in 1967 against the Arab countries about to wage war on her. In doing so Israel made her borders safer for her citizens)

 Saddam offers rewards to the families of suicide bombers and encourages terrorist strikes on the USA. I personally would rather see Saddam's regime deposed now than find out later the chemical weapon released in an American city came from Saddam.

Terrorism has been going on for decades now with very little opposition from the World in general. Terrorists strike innocent civilians in the name of whatever *cause* they are associated with.

I fully support President Bush's war on terrorism. It's about time someone did something to make the world a safer place for everyone. Terrorism needs to be stamped out now....not 6 months or 12 years from now.

When the World Trade Centers got destroyed Bush said....you are either with us or against us, there is no inbetween. You either support terrorism or you dont, there is no inbetween on this issue.

A final thought: Not a one of us who posts on these boards (whether in favor of the war or not) can do anything to change the events that are happening in Iraq.


Elfie
Armageddon Pile-it

HiTech give us Napalm
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13388
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2003, 04:00:15 PM »
Didn't bother reading your post Saburo but if it's your usual diatribe just go back to wherever it is you're coming from.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2003, 04:47:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
I read "Me me me, I, I I...center of the universe revolves around me"

(shrugs)

Respect her (the flag) and find another inanimate object to take your "Gov't" frustrations out on. Thats called R-E-S-P-E-C-T, something we've lacked in this country for several decades now.


Well for cryin out loud Rip... he was posting HIS position. I think that requires a few "I's" and "Me's", don't you?

So are you in favor of limiting free speech where the Flag is concerned?

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2003, 07:29:57 PM »
I am not a citizen of the United Nations. I am a citizen of the United States. The Un didn't prevent 9/11. The UN couldn't get themselves to dissarm iraq. The UN couldn't settle the other problems in the middle east. The UN is not the organization that will protect my country. The United States can and does cooperate with the UN when it will get the job done. The UN can't or won't get this one done so we'll take care of it.

Burn the UN flag all you want. Burn the US flag too. The flag doesn't feel any pain and that act does not influence our policy. It is just your tantrum of destruction since you cannot get your way. Pretty juvinlile.


PS Don't try to burn the flag in front of my home, or in front of me either for that matter.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2003, 07:50:06 PM »
I've seen the flag put to better use. Try http://www.whitehouse.com
:D

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Where I'm coming from.
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2003, 07:52:18 PM »
I didn't get  past his first sentence.

saburos is another one who is able to define himself only by who he opposes... and he will spend endless hours defending his "positions."

Boring.
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century