Author Topic: report 03-27-03  (Read 2982 times)

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« on: March 28, 2003, 02:31:04 AM »
March 27, 2003, 1425hrs MSK (GMT +3), Moscow - There has been a sharp increase in activity on the southern front. As of 0700hrs the coalition forces are subjected to nearly constant attacks along the entire length of the front. The Iraqi command took the advantage of the raging sand storm to regroup its troops and to reinforce the defenses along the approaches to Karabela and An-Najaf with two large armored units (up to two armored brigades totaling up to 200 tanks). The Iraqi attack units were covertly moved near the positions of the US 3rd Infantry Division (Motorized) and the 101st Airborne Division. With sunrise and a marginal visibility improvement the Iraqis attacked these US forces in the flank to the west of Karabela.

Simultaneously, massive artillery barrages and counterattacks were launched against units of the US 3rd Infantry Division and the 101st Airborne Division conducting combat operations near An-Najaf. The situation [for the US troops] was complicated by the fact that the continuing sand storm forced them to group their units into battalion convoys in order to avoid losing troops and equipment in near zero-visibility conditions. These battalion convoys were concentrated along the roads leading to Karabela and An-Najaf and had only limited defenses. There was no single line of the front; aerial reconnaissance in these conditions was not possible and until the very last moment the coalition command was unaware of the Iraqi preparations.

During one of such attacks [the Iraqi forces] caught off-guard a unit of the US 3rd Infantry Division that was doing vehicle maintenance and repairs. In a short battle the US unit was destroyed and dispersed, leaving behind one armored personnel carrier, a repair vehicle and two Abrams tanks, one of which was fully operational.

At the present time visibility in the combat zone does not exceed 300 meters, which limits the effectiveness of the 101st Airborne Division and that of its 70 attack helicopters representing the main aerial reconnaissance and ground support force of the coalition. One of the coalition transport helicopters crashed yesterday during take-off. The reason for the crash was sand in the engine compressors.

The Iraqis were able to get in range for close combat without losses and now fierce battles are continuing in the areas of Karabela and An-Najaf. The main burden of supporting the coalition ground troops has been placed with the artillery and ground attack aircraft. Effectiveness of the latter is minimal due to the weather conditions. Strikes can be delivered only against old Iraqi targets with known coordinates, while actually supporting the ground troops engaged in combat is virtually impossible and attempts to do so lead to the most unfortunate consequences.

Intercepted radio communications show that at around 0615hrs this morning the lead of a flight of two A-10 ground attack planes detected a convoy of armored vehicles. Unable to see any markings identifying these vehicles as friendly and not being able to contact the convoy by radio the pilot directed artillery fire to the coordinates of the convoy.

Later it was discovered that this was a coalition convoy. Thick layers of dust covered up the identification markings - colored strips of cloth in the rear of the vehicles. Electronic jamming made radio contact impossible. First reports indicated that the US unit lost 50 troops killed and wounded. At least five armored vehicles have been destroyed, one of which was an Abrams tank.

During the past day the coalition losses in this area [ Karabela and An-Najaf ] were 18-22 killed and up to 40 wounded. Most of the fatalities were sustained due to unexpected attacks by the Iraqi Special Forces against the coalition rears and against communication sites. This is a sign of the increasing diversionary and partisan actions by the Iraqis.

During the same period of time the Iraqi forces sustained up to 100 killed, about the same number of wounded and up to 50 captured.

Since the beginning of the operation no more than 2000 Iraqi troops were captured by the coalition. The majority of the captured troops were members of regional defense [militia] units.

The Iraqis were able to move significant reinforcements to the area of An-Nasiriya making it now extremely difficult for the Americans to widen their staging areas on the left bank of the Euphrates. Moreover, the Americans [on the left bank of the Euphrates] may end up in a very difficult situation if the Iraqis manage to destroy the bridges and to separate [these US units] from the main coalition force. The US forces in this area consist of up to 4,000 Marines from the 1st Marine Division and supporting units of the 82nd Airborne Division. Currently, fighting has resumed in the An-Nasiriya suburbs.

During one of the Iraqi attacks yesterday against the US positions the Iraqis for the first time employed the "Grad" mobile multiple rocket launch systems [MLRS]. As the result an entire US unit was taken out of combat after sustaining up to 40 killed and wounded as well as losing up to 7 armored vehicles.

There are no other reports of any losses in this area [ An-Nasiriya] except for one US Marine drowning in one of the city's water canals and another Marine being killed by a sniper.

During the sand storm the coalition command lost contact with up to 4 coalition reconnaissance groups. Their whereabouts are being determined. It is still unknown what happened to more than 600 other coalition troops mainly from resupply, communications and reconnaissance units communication with which was lost during the past 24 hours.

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2003, 02:32:05 AM »
The situation around Basra remains unclear. The Iraqis control the city and its suburbs, as well as the area south of Basra and the part of the adjacent Fao peninsula, which the British have so far failed to take. The British forces are blockading Basra from the west and northwest. However, due to difficult marshy terrain crossed by numerous waterways the British have been unable to create a single line of front and to establish a complete blockade of the city. Currently main combat operations are being launched for control of a small village near Basra where the local airport is located. The British field commanders report that there has been no drop in the combat activity of the Iraqis. On the contrary, under the cover of the sand storm up to two battalions of the "surrendered" Iraqi 51st Infantry Division were moved to the Fao peninsula to support the local defending forces.

Rumors about an uprising by the Basra Shiite population turned out to be false. Moreover, the Shiite community leaders called on the local residents to fight the "children of the Satan" - the Americans and the British.

During the past 24 hours the British sustained no less than 3 killed and up to 10 wounded due to mortar and sniper fire.

It is difficult to estimate the Iraqi losses [in Basra] due to limited available information. However, some reports suggest that up to 30 Iraqi troops were killed during the past day by artillery and aircraft fire.

During an attack against a coalition checkpoint in Umm Qasr last night one British marine infantry soldier was heavily wounded. This once again points to the tentative nature of the British claims of control over the town.

Information coming from northern regions of Iraq indicates that most of the Kurdish leaders chose not to participate in the US war against Iraq. The primary reason for that is the mistrust of the Kurds toward the US. Yesterday one of the Russian intelligence sources obtained information about a secret agreement reached between the US and the Turkish government. In the agreement the US, behind the backs of the Kurds, promised Turkey not to support in any way a formation of a Kurdish state in this region. The US has also promised not to prevent Turkey from sending its troops [ to Northern Kurdistan] immediately following [the coalition] capture of northern Iraq.

In essence, this gives Turkey a card-blanche to use force for a "cleanup" in Kurdistan. At the same time the Kurdish troops will be moved to fight the Iraqis outside of Kurdistan, thus rendering them unable to support their own people.

Along the border with Kurdistan Turkey has already massed a 40,000-strong army expeditionary corps that is specializing in combat operations against the Kurds. This force remains at a 4-hour readiness to begin combat operations.

All of this indicates that the coalition command will be unable to create a strong "Northern Front" during the next 3-4 days and that the US Marines and paratroopers in this area will have to limit their operations to distracting the Iraqis and to launching reconnaissance missions.

During a meeting with the Germany's chancellor [ Gerhard ] Schroeder the heads of the German military and political intelligence reported that the US is doing everything possible to conceal information on the situation in the combat zone and that the US shows an extremely "unfriendly" attitude. Germany's own intelligence-gathering capabilities in this region are very limited. This is the result of Germany, being true to its obligations as an ally, not attempting to bolster its national intelligence operations in the region and not trying to separate its intelligence agencies from the intelligence structures of NATO and the US.

There has been a confirmation of yesterday's reports about the plans of the coalition command to increase its forces fighting in Iraq. The troops of the 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) are currently being airlifted to the region, while its equipment is traveling by sea around the Arabian Peninsula and the unloading is expected to begin as early as by the end of tomorrow. The Division numbers 30,000 soldiers and officers. By the end of April up to 120,000 more US troops, up to 500 tanks and up to 300 more helicopters will be moved to the region.

In addition to that, today the US President [George W] Bush asked the British Prime-Minister [Tony] Blair to increase the British military presence in Iraq by a minimum of 15,000-20,000 troops.

At the current level of combat operations and at the current level of Iraqi resistance the coalition may face a sharp shortage of troops and weapons within the next 5-7 days, which will allow the Iraqis to take the initiative. The White House took this conclusion of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff with great concern.

During the past seven days of the war the US Navy detained all ships in the Persian Gulf going to Iraq under the US "Oil for Food" program. Since yesterday all these ships are being unloaded in Kuwait. Unloaded food is being delivered by the US military to Iraq and is being distributed as "American humanitarian aid" and as a part of the "rebuilding Iraq" program. These US actions have already cause a serious scandal in the UN. The US explained its actions by its unilateral decision to freeze all Iraqi financial assets, including the Iraqi financial assets with the UN. These assets the US now considers its property and will exercise full control over them. Captains of the detained ships have already called these actions by the US a "piracy."

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2003, 02:32:44 AM »
March 27, 2003, 2321hrs MSK (GMT +3), Moscow (UPDATE) - Intercepted radio communications indicate that tomorrow we should expect a powerful attack by the coalition. During all day today the coalition troops were being reinforced and fully resupplied with fuel and ammunition. Additional units reserved for maintaining security along the Kuwaiti border were moved today to the front lines. The total number of additional [coalition] forces to enter Iraq numbers up to five battalions and around 800 combat vehicles.

By 1600hrs today the sand storm in Iraq has subsided allowing coalition to resume helicopter support of ground troops. At the same time the Iraqi positions were attacked by bombers and ground attack aircraft, which forced the Iraqis to cease their attacks and to resume defensive operations.

Available information suggests that the coalition command, despite of the extreme exhaustion of its troops, will attempt to use elements of the 3rd Mechanized Infantry Division to actively contain the Iraqi forces around Karabela and to reach the strategic Al-Falludja highway by moving from the west around the Razzaza lake, thus cutting off the way to Jordan. It is expected that by noon of March 29 the main coalition forces will reach this area.

During the night from March 29 to March 30 elements of the US 82nd Airborne Division aided by the Army Special Operations units may attempt to capture the Saddam Hussein Airport. Immediately following the capture of the airport the coalition plans to use it for the deployment of a brigade from the 101st Airborne Division, which will be responsible for holding the airport until the arrival of the main forces.

Commanders of the reinforced Marine brigade trying to take An-Nasiriya for the fourth day have received strict orders to suppress the Iraqi defenses and to take the town during the next day, after which to continue their advance toward Al-Kut and Al-Ammara. Similarly strict orders were received by the command of the brigade attacking An-Najaf. They will have to take this town, widen the staging area on the left bank of the Euphrates and push the Iraqis away from the town. By the morning of March 29 both these brigades are supposed join up southwest of Al-Kut, where they will be reinforced by the elements of the 101st Airborne Division and, after forming a southern attack line, they would blockade Baghdad from the south.

The British command has been ordered to completely take over the Fao peninsula, complete the blockade of Basra from the south and to completely take over the [Basra] airport area. After that the British are to advance toward Basra from the south along the Al-Arab river.

Based on this information to say that tomorrow we should expect heated combat would be an understatement.

(source: iraqwar.ru, 03-27-03, translated by Venik)

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
report 03-27-03
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2003, 02:34:45 AM »
LOL!  Like reading Clancy, only more fictitious.  

Seems like coalition forces had better work on their communications security what with all these intercepted radio transmissions.

-- Todd/Leviathn

Offline Lazerus1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
report 03-27-03
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2003, 02:37:08 AM »
hey -am-, give us a link

ahh...nevermind..March 27, 2003, 2321hrs MSK (GMT +3), Moscow (UPDATE)

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2003, 02:38:58 AM »
Venik?

Offline Lazerus1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2003, 02:45:41 AM »
THX

The information from 03-25-03 proves to be true

According to [Russian military] intelligence Pentagon made a decision to significantly reinforce the coalition. During the next two weeks up to 50,000 troops and no less than 500 tanks will arrive to the combat area from the US military bases in Germany and Albania. By the end of April 120,000 more troops and up to 1,200 additional tanks will be sent to support the war against Iraq.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
report 03-27-03
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2003, 03:05:42 AM »
2003-03-26 22:42:00

Have Poor Marks? Ask Cockroach to Do Away With Them

Pupils from the Russian city of Yekaterinburg invented a new wonderful method to get rid of poor marks written in their school diaries. They are ready to share the new experience with other pupils who often get poor marks and don’t want to disappoint their parents with the fact of bad progress at school.

The new method is as follows. You should catch 10-20 cockroaches, put them into a small box and starve the insects for 2-3 days. Then you should pour some sweet syrup on the hateful poor mark in your diary and draw the diary open wide closer to the box with cockroaches. Yekaterinburg pupils say that hungry insects will immediately devour the syrup together with the ink and the space under the poor mark on the paper will be clean once again. Isn’t it a wonderful idea? You should try and find out if it’s effective.

2003-03-21 16:33:00

Man Sues Firm Over Big Pumpkins (0)

Nikolay Salakhov, a resident of the town of Pavlov-Posad in the Moscow region, is going to sue a Moscow seed firm. Nikolay is going to file the lawsuit on the allegation of improper seeds, which made him suffer from a brain concussion.

In the year 2002 Nikolay Salakhov bought a small packet of pumpkin seeds in order to grow them on the terrace of his country house. As instructions said, pumpkins entwine props up to two meters high and then grow decorative vegetables the size of a pear.

Nikolay planted those seeds, the plants entwined props on the terrace, although vegetables turned out to be a common size of a pumpkin, weighing up to 15 kilos. One of those big pumpkins fell down on Nikolay’s head, when he slammed the door behind him one fine day. Andrey Tumanov, the chairman of the Moscow Union of Gardeners, said that almost a half of the seeds, which are available on the Russian market today, do not correspond to gardening norms. It often happens that seed firms sell either defective or overdue storage seeds.

2003-03-13 20:02:00

Saunas: Combination of Fire and Water (0)

A lot of people like going to saunas. A sauna used to be associated with cold beer and a company of friends. Now the situation has changed a bit: going to a sauna implies some sort of sexual activities and even perversion sometimes. Steam, beer and friends have been pushed into the background. Since people love mixing business with pleasure, let us try to find out, to which extent the sauna entertainment is good, and to which extent it is bad.

Going to saunas is good, because:

A warmer atmosphere of a sauna is best to make people feel erotic and sexy. Skin nerve endings get very sensitive to caresses, and a couple of visits to the steam room purifies human mind. You are not likely to suffer from any kind of remorse for all mean things that you might do there: the brain will allow your body to do whatever it wants to do. This freedom can hardly be achieved in other circumstances, only with the help of a lot of alcohol, maybe.

The problem of getting undressed in public is not a problem anymore. Everyone gets naked in a sauna and there is no shyness about it. Everyone feels very relaxed. Although, it is always possible to hide intimate body parts with a towel, which is not going to be a serious obstacle like a swimsuit, or a coat, for example.

Steam makes you feel sober. If you are unlucky to drink more alcohol than your body can cope with, a sauna will bring you back to life in some twenty minutes. There are a lot of various conveniences in modern saunas – gyms, jacuzzi, billiards and so on.

Going to saunas is bad, because:

If you feel like having sex in a steam room, it will be a great hardship for your body. The cardiovascular system might not stand such passion both inside and outside. On the other hand, dying while having sex is definitely beautiful.

There are a lot of sources of danger. If you do not drown in a pool, you might lean over a red-hot wall. No one will find it pleasant, even those, who find a certain satisfaction in a little bit of pain.

When everything is naked and accessible, the interest becomes somewhat dull. It is not ruled out that the your excitement about a dressed individual will fade away instantly, when an individual takes his/her clothes off. Wearing pants and jackets is absolutely out of question in a sauna: this might end in a heat stroke.

On the whole, it should be mentioned that having sex in a sauna is good to human health. It is important to do it correctly, because the combination of fire and water can be very dangerous at times. The majority of saunas have special instructions hanging on its walls

2003-03-13 17:30:00

Two-headed Calf Born in Russia’s Vologda Region(0)

Recently a two-headed calf was born at a farm in Russia’s Vologda region. Unfortunately, farmers failed to save its life

At the end of February milkmaids at the Zarya farm clutched their heads in horror: their favorite cow named Toma delivered an unusual animal: it was a calf with two necks and two heads. The farmers were unhappy to see that the two-headed calf died during difficult confinement. Fortunately, the cow itself survived.

Veterinary specialists of the Vologda region say that appearance of the mutant calf is closely connected with worsening ecological situation in the region. Vets say that soils in the area where the strange calf was born catastrophically lack selenium and iodine, this fact causes anomalies. For instance, a calf without a tail was born at a neighboring farm last year. This was the first time that a two-headed calf was born.

Instances of births of such calves are rare in the world as well.

In the spring of 2001 a cow delivered a two-headed calf in a village 70 kilometers to the south of Tirana (Albania). Legends in that place say that birth of such animals brings misfortune, that is why the owner of the strange calf was in despair. However, the woman cheered up when the US Vet Association offered her to sell the mutant for 25 USD.

In the spring of 2002 a two-headed calf was also born in a farm in Russia’s Ulyanovsk region. Last summer similar mutant was born in Honduras. When the calf came to the world, owner of the cow nearly fainted as he saw the calf had two heads. At first, the two heads bellowed simultaneously and then tried to drive the whole of the body. However, the calf died in half an hour.

Scientists explain that such phenomena appear as a result of mutations in the organism in the period of embryonic growth of tissues. Mutations can be caused by unfavorable environmental situation first of all, high concentration of toxic substances and radiation.

2003-03-07 22:00:00

Ukrainian Citizen Changes His Last Name to Bush (0)

Arnold Schwarznegger is the name of a man, who lives in the Dnepropetrovsk region of Ukraine. As it was informed by the Ukrainian Justice Ministry, a man named Putin appeared in the Lugansk region of the country, while the Lvov region has someone, who is named Klitschko (in honor of a famous boxer). A resident of the Ternopol region changed his last name to Bush.

At the same time, a resident of the Lvov region of Ukraine wished to change his last name to Kuchma – the name of the incumbent Ukrainian president. However, internal affairs bodies turned the request down. There were 25 956 Ukrainian citizens, who wished to change their names in the year 2002. This is the official information of the Justice Ministry of Ukraine. Most often people decide to do such thing on account of the fact that their original names sound either funny or they are very hard to pronounce. For example, people changed such names as Kozel (Goat), Mogila (Grave), Krysko (Ratty), Durakov (Dumbo) , Vyrvykhvost (can be translated as ‘pull out a tail’) and many others.

In addition to that, twelve people of the Caucasian nationality changed their last names to Ukrainian ones. This tendency is typical for other regions of the country as well. Ukrainian names are basically changed to German, Italian, Jewish and English ones. Ukrainians like to become Laurita, Tatiana-Sara, Liona, Sabrina, Samantha, Isabella, Radmila, Zigminda. Some people change their names in honor of their favorite soap operas. A resident was incredibly impressed with Harry Potter’s adventures, so now his name is Potter Harry Zakh. A Kiev female resident named Olga changed her name twice in 2002: at first she became Ollga and then Olilga. Two female residents of the Lugansk region changed their last names to Romanov. It is interesting that the women did not know each other at all. Sometimes, civil status employees talk people out of their intention to change their names. For example, they convinced a man not to become Sekretov Sekret Sekretovich.

Ukrainian Justice Minister Alexander Lavrinovich reminded that changing names is absolutely legal in Ukraine. Any Ukrainian citizen of 16 years of age and older, is entitled to go to the adequate civil status department and to submit his or her application on that.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Better reading than the Star and the Globe put together I say.

So ... like I said before ... when's a good time for the party? Is it ok if I bring some friends? I've got about eight interested so far. But they like fresh clams. And I promised them there would be dates .... female .... no mustaches. Moscow models. If we could we'd like to stage the protests in the afternoon for about an hour (no more). Some of us don't like to walk around with signs in the cold all that much and we figure we'd like to sleep in and deal with our hangovers from the night before.

Oh ... and only a couple of the guys are fond of Vodka. Any chance of having scotch, Tennesee whiskey or beer available there from the States or western Europe? Or do we have to bring that in? They don't mind if we bring that in, do they?

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2003, 03:16:46 AM »
Results of surveys done on war opinions over the past few weeks paint a troubling picture of American society.

The polls revealed, in three different ways, that people in this country are dangerously uninformed about the links between Iraq and terrorism.

In a CBS/New York Times survey, 45 percent agreed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein "was personally involved in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Only 40 percent disagreed.

A Pew Foundation poll in February showed 57 percent supporting the contention that "Saddam helped 9-11 attacks." And in a Knight-Ridder poll asking how many Sept. 11 hijackers were Iraqi citizens, only 17 percent of Americans got it right. These revelations simply boggle the mind. There is no excuse for so many Americans to be so poorly informed in today's information age.

There is no evidence whatsoever that Saddam had anything to do with Sept. 11. Not one hijacker was an Iraqi, and even the Bush administration has never supported the war by claiming Saddam aided the hijackers in any way.

"Imagine those 19 (Sept. 11) hijackers with other weapons and other plans - this time armed by Saddam Hussein," Bush said during his State of the Union address.

The poll numbers do more than just reveal a misinformed public. They shed new light on surveys that show about 70 percent of Americans supporting the war against Saddam.

It's no wonder so many people support military action. Many of them believe American soldiers are fighting to capture or kill one of the men responsible for 3,000 deaths at the World Trade Center.

It is incumbent on all Americans educate ourselves about issues involved with this war. Declaring war is the most extreme action a government can take, and governments take that step in the name of their people.

Education is abundantly available. In addition to daily newspapers, television news and weekly newsmagazines, the Internet has made alternative sources accessible for anyone who can get on a computer. Entering "Saddam," "Sept. 11" and "link" into Google's search engine yields 45,800 hits.

If you distrust mainstream American media, the BBC (news.bbc.co.uk), Christian Science Monitor (csmonitor.com) and even an English version of Arab news outlet al-Jazeera's Web site (english.aljazeera.net), which launched Tuesday, provide different views.

Those international news sources also offer important perspectives on how the United States is being viewed overseas. Being unaware of our country's place in the world is as inexcusable as being uninformed about domestic and foreign policy.

There is no excuse to walk through life ignorant.

And if half of all Americans are ignorant about the most talked about, momentous news story of the past several months, how little might they know about other national and local issues? That number might be truly frightening.

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2003, 03:19:28 AM »
NEAR BASRA (AFP) - British soldiers have been scavenging the debris of war for Iraqi army boots because the British army variety are disintegrating in the hot desert sun.

Guardsman Lee Williams, 18, of the Desert Rats' Royal Scots Dragoon Guards battle group, found a new pair of boots in an abandoned barracks which he said were "lighter and more comfortable" than the British footwear.

He added that he had been forced to swap his footwear because no replacements were available for his own disintegrating boots.

Equipment shortages have affected British forces since their arrival in the Gulf.

Other soldiers are wearing patched-up combat trousers, repaired in one instance by removing a pocket, and in another case by cutting up a colleague's spare shirt.

Army officers concede there have been problems with supplies, partly because of the relatively short time available between the announcement of British deployment and the soldiers' arrival in the Gulf.

Guardsman Williams, from Birmingham, accepted that his footwear problems would not prevent him fighting effectively, but said that he was disappointed that he was having to wear Iraqi boots.

"I was in a prisoner of war camp two days ago in which there was an abandoned barracks and I saw a room full of boots and clothing," he said.

"The English boots I had on were coming apart, they were the black ones, not desert boots, and the sole on them was coming off because of the heat.

"So I picked up a pair of the Iraqi boots for myself. There were lots of them, and they are more comfortable and lighter than the ones I was wearing.

"I'm not too keen about it for obvious reasons and I would not have believed it if you'd have said that I would be wearing Iraqi boots before I came out here."

Another Irish Guard, Guardsman David Richardson, 22, from Manchester, has cut up his own trousers in an attempt to repair holes in the crotch and backside.

"I've only got one pair of desert combats and they were issued second-hand with tears in them which have got worse since I got here," he said. "I've had to cut my pocket out to make patches to cover up the holes. It's embarrassing.

"The Iraqi army seems to be better clothed than we are. We are supposed to look like professional soldiers, but we don't. I look like a tramp."

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
report 03-27-03
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2003, 03:21:25 AM »
Either I'm suddenly living under a totalitarian state, where every ounce of news is prepared in a uniform way so that there are no discrepancies, something completely unheard of, and we are suffering the huge number of casualties alluded to in that piece of 'journalism' (I call it that out of convention, rather than accuracy) despite how the very small number of casualties have had their relatives interviewed by the press...

...or that is a nominee for the short story of the year award.

Quote
In addition to that, today the US President [George W] Bush asked the British Prime-Minister [Tony] Blair to increase the British military presence in Iraq by a minimum of 15,000-20,000 troops.


And this is the kicker... this is the part of the report which really illustrates it for what it really is.

The British contingent already provides 1/3 of the Coalitions MBTs, in the form of Challenger II tanks. We provide a very large proportion of troops, equivalent to a third of our professional army. THERE ISN'T EVEN 10,000 TROOPS TO GIVE, NEVERMIND 20,000.

I fully expect the next report to suggest that conscription has begun in British cities.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
report 03-27-03
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2003, 03:24:00 AM »
Glad we are finally on the same side of something dowding.. :D

Offline --am--

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
report 03-27-03
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2003, 03:29:02 AM »
Most terrible now, that the myth about invincibility of the American army has disappeared. It is quite possible, that war will enter of Iran. That China will grasp Taiwan, and Japan attacks Northern Korea. Welcome on WWIII !

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
report 03-27-03
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2003, 03:30:32 AM »
Japan attack north korea...  LOL