Author Topic: Bring Back The Pics!!! (Read 1787 times)

bowser · « **Reply #30 on:** March 29, 2003, 05:55:56 PM »

For those going on about the disk space, I suspect it's also about the bandwidth. When you open a picture, you are in fact downloading it to your PC and using up bandwidth where the picture is stored. Everbody who has an email address should also have web space. Takes two seconds to store it there and link to it.

bowser

SELECTOR · « **Reply #31 on:** March 29, 2003, 06:11:15 PM »

so HTC is going for quantity not quality:(

Ecke-109- · « **Reply #32 on:** March 29, 2003, 06:35:28 PM »

thanks mates:)

@Beetle

first i click on 'insert image'. then i copy the adress into the box.
And as long as i edit this reply,there are these square brackets around it.
But after submitting reply,there is only a link to see.

last try:

Ecke-109- · « **Reply #33 on:** March 29, 2003, 06:42:51 PM »

ok ok....

who the heck needs pix?!......it just a kind of illusion.

>Stamping foot on the ground,kicking the cat,slamming the door<

beet1e · « **Reply #34 on:** March 30, 2003, 02:26:50 AM »

ecke!

I tried it and got the same thing. Looks like a BBS address. Can you not load your picture to your webspace? I'll host it on mine for you for the time being. Right click on the image to display the URL. I'll leave it there as long as you like if you were wanting to post this pic in other threads.

Flossy · « **Reply #35 on:** March 30, 2003, 05:22:47 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SELECTOR
so HTC is going for quantity not quality:(

I don't think so. If anything, it allows for better quality pictures, as hosting them externally means they are not limited in size, as attachments were. Also, several pictures can be included in the same message without the need for a separate post for each attachment.

If anything, I think the quality of connections, etc, will improve....

Flossy · « **Reply #36 on:** March 30, 2003, 05:27:04 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
Sorry, Flossy but that only applies to websites that support remote image hosting.

OK, how about this site that XtrmeJ used for his screensot - http://link.freepichosting.com ? OK, it has a banner across the bottom, but if it does the job....

Ecke-109- · « **Reply #37 on:** March 30, 2003, 07:09:48 AM »

Thank you beetle and all,

now i got it.
Obviously,it is not possible to bring pix here, which i posted before on our abbeville kids forum.
I have to talk with our board admins.

tx again mates

nopoop · « **Reply #38 on:** March 30, 2003, 11:29:31 AM »

I use two websites for my stuff.

The imagestation allows small to medium pics, does not allow access to "original" jpgs and works well for posting up samples. Works ok for what I use it for. Good place to store transparent gifs.

It's free ( and very clunky to use ) Some samples:

http://www.imagestation.com/

The second is for my wallpapers. EXCELLENT site, allows access to "originals" of any size, and storage is huge. I've got 180 wallpapers in there so far..

If I remember correctly it was 30 bucks for a year. With a 30 day free trial. Easy interface and have had zero problems. Highly recommended.

http://www.digitalpics.us/signup.cfm

udet · « **Reply #39 on:** March 30, 2003, 12:23:42 PM »

yeah I totally agree it's a big waste of time to upload your pics to the web and the post them here. How about reducing the size from 100k to 50k for pics posted here?

SOB · « **Reply #40 on:** March 30, 2003, 06:46:18 PM »

I'm kind of disappointed that they axed all of the images that were already on the BBS (maybe that couldn't be helped), but I was pretty suprised they allowed for it in the first place. That is a lot of space and bandwidth.

SOB

Mini D · « **Reply #41 on:** March 30, 2003, 07:21:45 PM »

Well.. they didn't axe this one in time. From HiTech's wedding:

Sixpence · « **Reply #42 on:** May 15, 2003, 01:08:12 PM »

Sixpence · « **Reply #43 on:** May 15, 2003, 01:08:49 PM »

sorry, tryin to figure pic posting:D

Swoop · « **Reply #44 on:** May 15, 2003, 02:54:54 PM »

Free image host that supports external links:

http://www.villagephotos.com