Author Topic: Figured we needed another gun thread!  (Read 1732 times)

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #30 on: March 31, 2003, 10:06:21 AM »
Gentlemen, gentlemen!  No aggression from me.

I agree, the film was not what I would consider to be a documentary. For that, Moore would have to have presented the subject matter in the first person. Some of it was, but most of it wasn't. I don't really see it as a matter over which one can be "open-minded" or otherwise, any more than I'm being "open-minded" about the cup of Yorkshire tea I'm going to make for myself in a few minutes. Every story has two sides (Aesop's Fables) but there can be no denying the grief on the face of that poor man whose son was shot through the face at Columbine. I don't need to read any walls-o-words to know that the scene was genuine. There can be no denying the fear of a guy who sleeps with a .44 Magnum under his pillow. And as for ”If more guns made for a safer society, then America would be the safest country in the world. It isn’t.” , I can find no flaw in that statement. My favourite part of the entire movie was the cartoon sequence, and I'd say it was pretty much on the mark. White, armed Suburbia indeed. OK, the movie stated that only white people (not blacks) could have guns. I am not prepared to accept that at face value. But was that ever true, in any state? I guess it would be academic if bullets cost $5,000 each! :p

Mr. Toad, I enjoyed the movie insofar as I enjoyed the "enlightenment", if I may use that word in this context for just a second. I saw some new material, many of the interviews were interesting, I enjoyed seeing Heston walking off into the sunset when Moore turned the screws a little harder...  poor guy has arthritis, doesn't he? But I DO NOT "enjoy" seeing people shot, young promising lives cut short, and grieving relatives of young children. I wonder what their take was on this movie.

OK, Mr. Toad - to keep the balance, I'll read those walls - but first I'm going to make that tea... ;)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #31 on: March 31, 2003, 10:16:28 AM »
Heston has Alzheimer's. Gee, no wonder Moore looked so smugly superior talking to him.

So, what did you make of the Canadian conundrum then? They've got as many guns as we do, much less homicide. Is it the guns then? Even Moore couldn't find a real answer and that's where his film wanders off into the empty space between his ears.

:D
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13430
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #32 on: March 31, 2003, 10:29:04 AM »
There have always been and will always be fools in this world. Adding "The Academy" to the list.

Thanks for the post Toad.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2003, 10:31:39 AM by AKIron »
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2003, 10:39:40 AM »
LA times proved the people booing were mic'd up stage hands. anyways its one thing to debunk alot of the creatively edited shots its another to actually try and answer the questions the guys raise's in the film. I do think our culture is fear based. We are better consumers when we are scared and it sure the hell seems likes alot of you are living in fear and hate.

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2003, 10:48:22 AM »
So... the only thing that's really important is that a movie says what you want it to say.  Everything else is just a bonus.

MiniD

Offline mauser

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2003, 11:26:28 AM »
I missed this post over the weekend - played a good 2-1/2 hour
three set doubles match yesterday and spent the rest of the evening/night relaxing with my wife.  

Thanks for posting the article Toad!  I posted a link in the "Michael
Moore Wins an Oscar" thread a short while ago, but wasn't sure
anyone saw it.  I'm surprised beet1e missed it there also.  There
was plenty of time to look it over.  It's disappointing to see how
people try to prove their point by using falsified information.
Come on beet1e, just take the time to read it.  "Wall-o-words?"
You should know better than that.

mauser

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2003, 11:28:33 AM »
I read that one too Mauser.  Thanks again for the link.

MiniD

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Gee look.
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2003, 11:44:45 AM »
I guess beetle didn't learn his lesson from his last run of look at me threads...


Hmm just another lame thread...

Laz, Toad, why do you bother with this guy? LOL everything that could be said was said in the other thread, jeez he had not even seen the whole film when he started this wank off fest...

Hell Why am I bothering?

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2003, 12:50:30 PM »
Mauser, I saw various threads about this movie, and that's why I decided to download it to see it. Do a search on Bowling and Columbine, and you'll find about 8 threads.

I've read the first two walls. :)

GTO -RA2 - that's it. Other people have been talking about this movie - why shouldn't I? I didn't even bang on about the theme. All I said was I had seen it, found it interesting (though not a documentary) and that some of the material had provided some new angles. How do you make a wank fest out of that? But if you have, I guess you could make a wank fest out of anything.

Quote
Originally posted by Mr. Toad
So, what did you make of the Canadian conundrum then? They've got as many guns as we do, much less homicide. Is it the guns then? Even Moore couldn't find a real answer and that's where his film wanders off into the empty space between his ears.
Well, if you recall the cartoon section, a key factor was the enslavement of blacks in the 19th century. Then when slavery ended, they got a bit pissed off. The black lady on the bus refused to move to the back when asked by the whites. And the whites got a bit panicky. Somewhere along the line the KKK gets a mention. The whites ended up in suburbia, and the blacks were left in the cities, where they were free to kill themselves.

And the point is... did Canada ever enslave blacks from Africa? I don't think so. Looking at the social problems that can be traced back to the 19th century, America created a social time bomb. Canada didn't.

LOL GTO!  you try to stay away, but you just can't. :p So far as the fest goes, you're no longer King of the Castle. Did you see that episode of Seinfeld?  ;)
« Last Edit: March 31, 2003, 01:02:12 PM by beet1e »

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2003, 04:43:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
.

but the American public bought it, and had visions of Armageddon[/u]. One guy even constructed a shelter in upstate NY from the roofs of 45 yellow school buses! So this was another angle that made me think, and took place long before Moore's movie, so don't blame him!




The american public did not buy it. Some crackpots did.
The media fuels the crackpots.
I know hundreds of folks here in my town and not 1 of them
stockpiled rations for y2k. And the african bees?

rofl....

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2003, 04:49:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
LA times proved the people booing were mic'd up stage hands. anyways its one thing to debunk alot of the creatively edited shots its another to actually try and answer the questions the guys raise's in the film. I do think our culture is fear based. We are better consumers when we are scared and it sure the hell seems likes alot of you are living in fear and hate.



Yo dood! with M Jackson the baby swinger in his sig!
Check out this :D

 http://www.madblast.com/view.cfm?type=FunFlash&display=1804

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2003, 07:47:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
Well, if you recall the cartoon section,  The whites ended up in suburbia, and the blacks were left in the cities, where they were free to kill themselves....

And the point is... did Canada ever enslave blacks from Africa? America created a social time bomb. Canada didn't.



Three questions then:

Have you decided then that all the blame belongs to the racial aspect and the number/availability of guns is no longer your main argument? :D

If so, are you saying that the difference is black on black homicide or black on both black & white homicide?

And, before you answer that......

Have you actually checked the stats by race in the US as compared to Canada?

:D
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline rc51

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #42 on: March 31, 2003, 11:14:52 PM »
Ilove my gun's


Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2003, 04:28:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr. Toad
Three questions then:

Have you decided then that all the blame belongs to the racial aspect and the number/availability of guns is no longer your main argument? :D

If so, are you saying that the difference is black on black homicide or black on both black & white homicide?

And, before you answer that......

Have you actually checked the stats by race in the US as compared to Canada?

:D
Mr. Toad, Mr. Toad! What's all this about an argument? This thread is about a movie which I found... interesting. We're not having an argument! Where did I argue? I'll read walls 3 and 4 if you'll reread my initial post, and you will see that I didn't say anything to start an argument. Of course, for someone like me, the very mention that I have seen that movie is enough for some people to think I'm starting one. ;)  But since you ask, and since your questions are reasonable, I'll try to comment.

  • No, I have not decided then that all the blame belongs to the racial aspect. Britain also is multi-racial. But we have fewer than 100 gun related deaths per annum, as compared with the many thousands that the US has. So it's not purely a social/racial issue.
  • Having answered No to the first question, the second question is null.
  • No I haven't "checked the stats" for homicide by race in Canada. Should I have done? I'll be glad to review yours if you have them, but not if they're written on the side of your movie theatre popcorn bucket. :)
In the US, however, the black on black homicides would seem to be a substantial proportion of the overall total. That is certainly borne out by the stats for Washington DC where, I believe, 60% of the population is black, and for New York - a city of some 10m blacks - more than any other city in the world (according to a 1980s Trivial Pursuit question). I don't know how many blacks there are in Canada, or whether any of their cities have black ghettos like South Central Los Angeles/The Watts district.

My parents were horrified when I told them in 1980 that I'd be living in Chicago. But whereas the (black) south side was like a war zone, the (white) NW suburbs where I lived were law abiding and peaceful. And I didn't need a gun. ;)

The relatively high US homicide rate stems from a combination of factors. As you have been at pains to point out, guns on their own are not the problem. But as I am at pains to point out, neither is a multi-racial society: Unlike America, we do not have thousands upon thousands of gun related homicides in Britain each year, despite the racial mix.

A can of petrol for the lawnmower, kept in a cool dry place out of sunlight, is safe. So is a box of matches. Out in the open, petrol spilt on the ground will quickly evaporate. And a lit match will, at worst, burn my fingers. Speaking figuratively, America has a lot of people spilling petrol, and a lot of people playing with matches.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2003, 04:32:58 AM by beet1e »

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Figured we needed another gun thread!
« Reply #44 on: April 01, 2003, 08:12:59 AM »
Let's not be disingenuous Beetle. Look at the title of your thread and consider the history of such threads. Your protestations that you wern't looking for an argument (in my usage, argument as in debate) seem pretty....... transparent.

So, perhaps we can cut to the chase.


Beetle:

"Well, if you recall the cartoon section, a key factor was the enslavement of blacks in the 19th century"

followed by:

"And the point is... did Canada ever enslave blacks from Africa? I don't think so. Looking at the social problems that can be traced back to the 19th century, America created a social time bomb. Canada didn't."

But now:

"No, I have not decided then that all the blame belongs to the racial aspect."

You agree it's not race now? :D

So, if it's not race as you seem to be saying NOW...... we're back to:


So, what did you make of the Canadian conundrum then? They've got as many guns as we do, much less homicide. Is it the guns then?



BTW, now that you've read the "debunking" what do you think of Moore's honesty? Did he take a "fair" attitude or did he attempt to create a propaganda piece?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!